Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HI,
Often I can see coils where some turns are shorted in order to modify there value. I wonder whether these shorted turns would not be seen as a short cicuit and could decrease the quality of that coil. How can I have an idea of the lost of quality without complex equipment ? I plan to build this kind of coil for a shortened antenna... regards |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tomylavitesse" wrote in message ... HI, Often I can see coils where some turns are shorted in order to modify there value. I wonder whether these shorted turns would not be seen as a short cicuit and could decrease the quality of that coil. How can I have an idea of the lost of quality without complex equipment ? I plan to build this kind of coil for a shortened antenna... regards Good question! I've always wondered about that too. In a former life as a marine electronics technician, the old marine "AM" transmitter antenna tuners uses shorted turns a lot. It always sort of went against the grain, I thought, but in practice, it seemed to work ok. What was I missing here? Old Chief Lynn, W7LTQ and some commercials with endorsements |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
coffelt2 wrote: Good question! I've always wondered about that too. In a former life as a marine electronics technician, the old marine "AM" transmitter antenna tuners uses shorted turns a lot. It always sort of went against the grain, I thought, but in practice, it seemed to work ok. What was I missing here? Old Chief Lynn, W7LTQ and some commercials with endorsements My understanding is that the presence of the shorted turns in the coil does lower the Q of the coil somewhat. If the loaded Q of the system/application is already low enough, the reduction in coil Q doesn't result in an unacceptable increase in losses. The alternative, in some cases, is to leave the unused turns open at one end. This isn't always possible, and when it is possible it can have an unfortunate side effect. Autotransformer action can cause the open end of the turns to develop a high voltage relative to the rest of the system, and there can be arcing to nearby points of lower potential. Could make a mess of the inside of your transmatch :-( -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
coffelt2 wrote:
"Tomylavitesse" wrote in message ... HI, Often I can see coils where some turns are shorted in order to modify there value. I wonder whether these shorted turns would not be seen as a short cicuit and could decrease the quality of that coil. How can I have an idea of the lost of quality without complex equipment ? I plan to build this kind of coil for a shortened antenna... regards Good question! I've always wondered about that too. In a former life as a marine electronics technician, the old marine "AM" transmitter antenna tuners uses shorted turns a lot. It always sort of went against the grain, I thought, but in practice, it seemed to work ok. What was I missing here? Old Chief Lynn, W7LTQ and some commercials with endorsements In many military antenna tuners, the variable inductor inside the tuner was open on one end. The coil was rotated such that the length of the coil winding was changed, or the position of the tap was changed to effect the tuning. There were also some tuners that spooled one end of the coil onto a grounded metal drum. The mechanism changed the effective length of the coil, but did not introduce any shorted turns. -- David masondg44 at comcast dot net |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tomylavitesse wrote:
HI, Often I can see coils where some turns are shorted in order to modify there value. I wonder whether these shorted turns would not be seen as a short cicuit and could decrease the quality of that coil. How can I have an idea of the lost of quality without complex equipment ? I plan to build this kind of coil for a shortened antenna... regards If the shorted turns are connected to one end of the coil then the total shorted turns would appear as the final turn of the coil. In amateur transmitters the band switch often shorts turns from the cold end of the tank coil as one switches to higher frequency bands. The shorted turns simply are not in the circuit I guess. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2009-09-24, Tomylavitesse wrote:
HI, Often I can see coils where some turns are shorted in order to modify there value. I wonder whether these shorted turns would not be seen as a short cicuit and could decrease the quality of that coil. How can I have an idea of the lost of quality without complex equipment ? I plan to build this kind of coil for a shortened antenna... The circuit to shorten turns in such environments has to be very low loss. Otherwise you will have lots of power lost in this short circiuted parts of the coil. And in PA / antenna environments you always have power. This is why switches are always "heavy duty" in PA and antenna switching units. If you do so, the current in this shortened turns is a complex current. And as you know, complex currents do not consume power. Only the real parts of current do. This is totally different from the situation e.g. in a power transformator. If you would shorten turns there, you would have power loss, because the resistant of the turns in power transformators has a much higher real part compared with rf coils in PA / antenna units. OK? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rtfm wrote:
On 2009-09-24, Tomylavitesse wrote: HI, Often I can see coils where some turns are shorted in order to modify there value. I wonder whether these shorted turns would not be seen as a short cicuit and could decrease the quality of that coil. How can I have an idea of the lost of quality without complex equipment ? I plan to build this kind of coil for a shortened antenna... The circuit to shorten turns in such environments has to be very low loss. Otherwise you will have lots of power lost in this short circiuted parts of the coil. And in PA / antenna environments you always have power. This is why switches are always "heavy duty" in PA and antenna switching units. If you do so, the current in this shortened turns is a complex current. And as you know, complex currents do not consume power. Only the real parts of current do. This is totally different from the situation e.g. in a power transformator. If you would shorten turns there, you would have power loss, because the resistant of the turns in power transformators has a much higher real part compared with rf coils in PA / antenna units. OK? This seemed like an insightful response - but not one with universal appeal. Let me try embroidering on this theme a little more.... The leakage path for current in an insulated wire is strikingly different from the leakage path in a magnetic conductor - usually called a core or stamping. The leakage resistance can easily be 1000 megohms compared to the conductor's resistance of (say) 1 ohm. A ratio of a billion to one. The leakage path for cores and stampings is lucky to be a thousand times more "resistive" than the path through the core - if it's an iron stamping, an iron dust core, or a ferrite core. A ratio of a thousand to one. For air cored coils, the leakage path is lower still, so that the magnetic path does not couple all turns together at the best of times. If an end turn or two is shorted, the reactive current in the shorted turn pinches off most of the magnetic coupling from the remaining coil altogether, so the effect is not as dramatic as we might expect. Waddaya think of that? Brian W |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "brian whatcott" wrote in message ... rtfm wrote: On 2009-09-24, Tomylavitesse wrote: HI, Often I can see coils where some turns are shorted in order to modify there value. I wonder whether these shorted turns would not be seen as a short cicuit and could decrease the quality of that coil. How can I have an idea of the lost of quality without complex equipment ? I plan to build this kind of coil for a shortened antenna... The circuit to shorten turns in such environments has to be very low loss. Otherwise you will have lots of power lost in this short circiuted parts of the coil. And in PA / antenna environments you always have power. This is why switches are always "heavy duty" in PA and antenna switching units. If you do so, the current in this shortened turns is a complex current. And as you know, complex currents do not consume power. Only the real parts of current do. This is totally different from the situation e.g. in a power transformator. If you would shorten turns there, you would have power loss, because the resistant of the turns in power transformators has a much higher real part compared with rf coils in PA / antenna units. OK? This seemed like an insightful response - but not one with universal appeal. Let me try embroidering on this theme a little more.... The leakage path for current in an insulated wire is strikingly different from the leakage path in a magnetic conductor - usually called a core or stamping. The leakage resistance can easily be 1000 megohms compared to the conductor's resistance of (say) 1 ohm. A ratio of a billion to one. The leakage path for cores and stampings is lucky to be a thousand times more "resistive" than the path through the core - if it's an iron stamping, an iron dust core, or a ferrite core. A ratio of a thousand to one. For air cored coils, the leakage path is lower still, so that the magnetic path does not couple all turns together at the best of times. If an end turn or two is shorted, the reactive current in the shorted turn pinches off most of the magnetic coupling from the remaining coil altogether, so the effect is not as dramatic as we might expect. Waddaya think of that? Brian W Wooo hoooooo, now we're cookin' Old Chief Lynn |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2009-09-27, brian whatcott wrote:
... The leakage path for current in an insulated wire is strikingly different from the leakage path in a magnetic conductor - usually called a core or stamping. The leakage resistance can easily be 1000 megohms compared to the conductor's resistance of (say) 1 ohm. A ratio of a billion to one. The leakage path for cores and stampings is lucky to be a thousand times more "resistive" than the path through the core - if it's an iron stamping, an iron dust core, or a ferrite core. A ratio of a thousand to one. For air cored coils, the leakage path is lower still, so that the magnetic path does not couple all turns together at the best of times. If an end turn or two is shorted, the reactive current in the shorted turn pinches off most of the magnetic coupling from the remaining coil altogether, so the effect is not as dramatic as we might expect. Waddaya think of that? Thanks for this posting. You are totally right. I tried to explain thinks a little more easier. And if you try to reduce complexity in an explanation, you have to simplyfy. Looks like I simplyfied too much. My fault. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Thanks everybody. I just found your answers, so I will work with them. I've also found some other info on my old handbook ARRL. Thanks again Raph |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|