Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I graduated from college back in the 1994, and even then we were admonished to
avoid magnetics whenever possible. Of course, these days I know better, but as a result my academic coverage of IF transformers was non-existant. I'm now trying to make up for that transgression. :-) I've done a fair amount of reading and have a good understanding on how IF transformers work, how they should be modeled, how to build them, etc. (Most of the books that address this in detail are from the 1970s or older, it seems...) I still have a few questions, though, that I'm hoping a few of the older reads could help me out on. They a 1) The really big 450kHz IF transformers you see in tube sets... why did they wind the coils in the form of "pancakes" rather than "the usual way" (single-layer coils)? Is it just a consequence of needing lots of turns (to get enough magnetizing inductance) but, for the coupling coefficient desired, finding that you'd end up with, e.g,. a foot-long tranformer if you only used a single layer? 2) I can readily see why you'd want a center-tapped primary, or a primary with, say, a tap 10% "up" as a small feedback winding, but why do you get such things as an IF transformer with 103 and 50 turns on the primary (on either side of the tap) and then 27 turns on the secondary? (E.g., http://www.mouser.com/catalog/specsheets/XC-600014.pdf ). None of my books address this, and the only thing that looks close on the web is this article: http://hem.passagen.se/communication/ifcan.html . Is his conclusion, "by tapping the transformer the Q value increases" the main reason? 3) Sticking a parallel capacitor on the primary to resonate out the magnetizing inductance makes sense to me. I'm a little less clear on parallel capacitors on both the primary and secondary -- a double-tuned arrangement. Hagen's "Radio Frequency Electronics" assigns leakage inductance to the secondary and then converts the resonating capacitor in parallel with your load resistance back into a series circuit and, voila!, you now have a series RLC circuit so clearly bandpass behavior... but this approach implies that you could just use a *series* resonating capacitor on the secondary instead. Is that correct? (I am aware that there are a handful of commonly used transformer equivalent circuit models, you can transform magnetizing or leakage inductances and losses from primary to secondary or vice versa at will, etc.) 4) Anyone have pointers to good books or articles that ideally discuss some actual design examples of the more complicated cases (weird primary turns ratios, double-tuned circuits, etc.)? -- The ones I've found so far as the simpler single-tuned case, just center-tapped, etc. Thanks a lot... I appreciate the help here! ---Joel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Guy's Questions Raises More Questions | Shortwave | |||
FA: RCA Transformers | Swap | |||
Questions about I.F. Transformers | Homebrew | |||
FS: Transformers | Swap | |||
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna |