Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something I've wondered for awhile now is this: Since you get the same VSWR
with a load both higher than or lower than your "expected" load (we'll call this Z0, and the actual load Zl), either Zl/Z0 or Z0/Zl respectively, is one siutation more likely to kill an amp than the other? When ZlZ0, you tend to (ignoring phase effects here) end up with a higher voltage sitting on the finals than when Zl=Z0... but less current than the matched case. With ZlZ0, it's typically lower voltage but higher current. Based on what I know from, e.g., power supply design, there's usually more of a margain from overvoltage than there is from overcurrent, in that you can often find parts that inherently withstand a 2:1 or better overvoltage margain with just a bit of extra cost, whereas overcurrent will tend to overheat the power devices and getting rid of, e.g., 2-4x as much heat (vs. matched case) can require significantly greater heatsinking which often isn't cheap. In the extreme case, I'd expect that far more amps will blow when shorted than when open-circuited. But I don't really have much experience in this area... so... could anyone comment on what you tend to see in real designs? Perhaps also compare and contrast tube-based amp with solid-state ones? Thanks you, ---Joel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
killing cars with high RF? | Homebrew | |||
killing cars with high RF? | CB | |||
killing cars with high RF? | General | |||
killing cars with high RF? | Antenna | |||
Caculating VSWR from rho and rho from VSWR | Antenna |