Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24 2011, 7:26*pm, Lemon Tree wrote:
I have written a short book on regenerative receiver that I have available hehttp://www.vendio.com/stores/newproducts and hehttp://www.webstore.com/Regenerative...k,name,1372041... I also have some negative resistance circuits and other things hehttp://code.google.com/p/lemontree/downloads/list Why not build some superhets instead? They work better. Regens have crappy audio, making them undesireable for SWLing or listening to the few hams worth listening to who are on AM... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" wrote in message ample.net... On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, wrote: On Dec 24 2011, 7:26 pm, Lemon Tree wrote: I have written a short book on regenerative receiver that I have available hehttp://www.vendio.com/stores/newproducts and hehttp://www.webstore.com/Regenerative...k,name,1372041... I also have some negative resistance circuits and other things hehttp://code.google.com/p/lemontree/downloads/list Why not build some superhets instead? They work better. Regens have crappy audio, making them undesireable for SWLing or listening to the few hams worth listening to who are on AM... Because they are simple, and it's good to get something to work early on. But I certainly had meant to ask why should anyone buy his book. Charles Kitchin over the past 20 years or so has done quite a bit with regen and superregen receivers. He had long articles on both in Communications Quarterly, looking back to the beginning (when most people have adapted more recent work, so it's like a broken telephone). By going back to the beginning, he was able to introduce some new concepts in superregen, which would never come up based on most of the descriptions of the receiver. Circa 1915, whenever Armstrong cameup with the regen, those things were pretty simple, for the simple reason that tubes were expensive, and bulky. In the transistor age, you can buy quite a few transistors for the price of a tube in the old days. Make the regen solid, like a VFO (which it really is). Add a buffer ahead of it, so the antenna doesn't affect operation as much. Use a separate detector, something so lost in it all that we talk about "regenerative detector" but the actual detection is secondary to the regeneration. Add a voltage regulator, nobody would do that in the old days, now it's hardly worth not doing. That's some of the work Charles Kitchin has done with regens in recent years, some very basic receivers for the beginner (including one that used a crystal as the frequency determining element), some more complicated than others. Or go take his work and go back to the thirties, and build a supergainer out of Frank C. Jones' Radio Handbook. A compromise/hybrid, it's a regen with a converter ahead of it, or looked at another way, a superheterodyne with a regen detector. Takes out some of the issues of the regen, it isolates the detector from the antenna, the regen stage doesn't have to cover a wide range (and if the converter is tuneable, the regen stage stays on one frequency). You can even put a crystal filter between the mixer and the regen stage. So a regen still has potential. A simple receiver to accomplish building something (41 years ago, I rushed down to the parts store with a list of parts out of a magazine, and that project, and the one after, never worked, in retrospect I can see lots of reasons why. But I kept at it, and then I did get some things going, ironically out of scrap parts, having learned enough to actually know what I was doing). But it can also be a method of experimentation. Not to create Something Important, but by trying new things, one can learn. Michael VE2BVW Ah, yes, the one tube (01A) regen on the broadcast band, late at night North of Seattle Washington, listening to Snake Oil Salesmen from Del Rio, Texas, With transmitters in Warez, Mexico........XERF, ISTR. A thrill that must be experienced to be believed. And the Grand Old Oprey or the Barn Dance!! KGO and KSL came in like gangbusters!! Old Chief Lynn, W7LTQ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You could do all that or you could just add a LO and mixer and then
the radio only has to work at one frequency. Simple. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" wrote in message ample.net... By going back to the beginning, he was able to introduce some new concepts in superregen, which would never come up based on most of the descriptions of the receiver. Another good area to start off with is crystal sets, from an era when they had to be sensitive and serious receivers as they were all there was. For SSB, CW and improved AM reception you add a 1 transistor VFO/BFO, which amongst other things brings up the sensitivity. There's a video demo of this he http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihLbcaOvhiA I would use this as your baseline for comparison with regenerative and direct conversion. The 'amplified crystal set' approach doesn't have the frequency pulling problems that regen sets can have. Peter |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately Mr Kitchin does not seem to understand the basic theory
of how regenerative radio receivers work. People who have built his circuits often have irresolvable problems trying to get them to work. In my book I indicate exactly what the problems are and how they are solved. There are also a bunch of circuits that are of general interest to anyone building any type of radio. All in all for the price you get a lot more than you would get in a copy of QST for example. The book is now he http://www.webstore.com/Regenerative...uction_details |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seeking advice on regenerative receiver | Boatanchors | |||
Regenerative Tube Receiver schematic | Homebrew | |||
Regenerative Tube Receiver | Homebrew | |||
Regenerative Tube Receiver | Homebrew | |||
Regenerative Receiver with Tubes | Homebrew |