On several occasions now, I have endeavoured to promote
technical discussion in this NG, but in every case, it is M3OSN
who dives in and claims that each attempt is a vehicle for abuse,
but actually originates abuse in the first instance as he does so,
and then, when he is faced by opposing viewpoints, instead of
engaging in adult debate, he runs away shouting insults as he goes.

Why does someone who claims to represent the interests of
newcomers and claims, falsely it would now appear, to be in favour
of open revelation of facts behave in such a negative and
destructive manner?

"gareth" wrote in message
...
On several occasions now, I have endeavoured to promote
technical discussion in this NG, but in every case, it is M3OSN
who dives in and claims that each attempt is a vehicle for abuse,
but actually originates abuse in the first instance as he does so,
and then, when he is faced by opposing viewpoints, instead of
engaging in adult debate, he runs away shouting insults as he goes.


Perhaps if you abstained totally from endeavouring to promote technical
discussion in this NG, you wouldn't
get the attacking abuse and remarks aimed at you?
Its a simple enough remedy, but perhaps not simple enough for you to
understand.
Savvy?

On 14/05/2014 21:59, Generic wrote:
...
On several occasions now, I have endeavoured to promote
technical discussion in this NG, but in every case, it is M3OSN
who dives in and claims that each attempt is a vehicle for abuse,
but actually originates abuse in the first instance as he does so,
and then, when he is faced by opposing viewpoints, instead of
engaging in adult debate, he runs away shouting insults as he goes.


Perhaps if you abstained totally from endeavouring to promote technical
discussion in this NG, you wouldn't
get the attacking abuse and remarks aimed at you?
Its a simple enough remedy, but perhaps not simple enough for you to
understand.
Savvy?


You've missed the point, he wants a row. That is why it is best not to
respond to him.

I suspect he has little to no human contact during the day, other than
those he rows with on the internet. That is why he is always trying to
start or maintain a row.

On Wed, 14 May 2014 23:20:12 +0100, Brian Reay wrote:

On 14/05/2014 21:59, Generic wrote:
...
On several occasions now, I have endeavoured to promote
technical discussion in this NG, but in every case, it is M3OSN
who dives in and claims that each attempt is a vehicle for abuse,
but actually originates abuse in the first instance as he does so,
and then, when he is faced by opposing viewpoints, instead of
engaging in adult debate, he runs away shouting insults as he goes.


Perhaps if you abstained totally from endeavouring to promote technical
discussion in this NG, you wouldn't
get the attacking abuse and remarks aimed at you?
Its a simple enough remedy, but perhaps not simple enough for you to
understand.
Savvy?


You've missed the point, he wants a row. That is why it is best not to
respond to him.

I suspect he has little to no human contact during the day, other than
those he rows with on the internet. That is why he is always trying to
start or maintain a row.

So why do you persist in goading him?

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

You've missed the point, he wants a row. That is why it is best not to
respond to him.

I suspect he has little to no human contact during the day, other than
those he rows with on the internet. That is why he is always trying to
start or maintain a row.

You stupid boy.

En el artículo , Generic
escribió:

Perhaps if you abstained totally from endeavouring to promote technical
discussion in this NG, you wouldn't
get the attacking abuse and remarks aimed at you?

Evans flounced off a few weeks ago (claiming he had been advised by the
police to refrain from posting - yeah right) and this group immediately
took a turn for the better. It was becoming quite pleasant and civilised
until he returned and wrecked it again.

He's an inveterate attention-seeker who can't bear the thought of the
group getting along well without him.

--
(\_/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

"Mike Tomlinson" wrote in message
...

Evans flounced off a few weeks ago (claiming he had been advised by the
police to refrain from posting - yeah right) and this group immediately
took a turn for the better. It was becoming quite pleasant and civilised
until he returned and wrecked it again.

No unpleasantness has come from me. But you, as quoted above, are
an entirely different matter





He's an inveterate attention-seeker who can't bear the thought of the
group getting along well without him.

39 43 46 48 50 51

Now, there you are again, Tomlinson. As I'm in contact with PS Reynolds
this week, perhpas you could identify for me the "plod" (as you put it)
that
you say is building a file on me?

"gareth" wrote in message
...
On several occasions now, I have endeavoured to promote
technical discussion in this NG, but in every case, it is M3OSN
who dives in and claims that each attempt is a vehicle for abuse,
but actually originates abuse in the first instance as he does so,
and then, when he is faced by opposing viewpoints, instead of
engaging in adult debate, he runs away shouting insults as he goes.

Why does someone who claims to represent the interests of
newcomers and claims, falsely it would now appear, to be in favour
of open revelation of facts behave in such a negative and
destructive manner?


True to form, M3OSN has used this very thread, the thread that
criticises his abusive tendency, to originate abusive remarks.

Can the leopard change his spots? Is the Pope an atheist? etc etc etc

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Mike Tomlinson" wrote in message
...

Evans flounced off a few weeks ago (claiming he had been advised by the
police to refrain from posting - yeah right) and this group immediately
took a turn for the better. It was becoming quite pleasant and civilised
until he returned and wrecked it again.

No unpleasantness has come from me. But you, as quoted above, are
an entirely different matter

Remember, Tomlinson, that it was the nasty snide emotional states that
you present to this NG that raised the question as to whether you were
a suitable role model to be involved with young people.

"gareth" wrote in message
...
On several occasions now, I have endeavoured to promote
technical discussion in this NG, but in every case, it is M3OSN
who dives in and claims that each attempt is a vehicle for abuse,
but actually originates abuse in the first instance as he does so,
and then, when he is faced by opposing viewpoints, instead of
engaging in adult debate, he runs away shouting insults as he goes.

Why does someone who claims to represent the interests of
newcomers and claims, falsely it would now appear, to be in favour
of open revelation of facts behave in such a negative and
destructive manner?


And, from his childish behaviour of today, continue to behave so
destructively?