Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, this is related to the noise cancelling device described at
http://www.geocities.com/g4lna/noisdes.html I'm trying to figure out if I can substitute type 61 or type 43 ferrites for the transformers, because I have these ferrite ring cores but I do not have the iron powder toroids. Also, using type 43 ferrites would allow me to use fewer turns. (That 160m/180m transformer requires about 50 turns!) From my experience with high-power RF transformers, I know that iron powder toroids are less vulnerable to core saturation and excess heating. The phase shifter and the amplifier in the noise cancelling device do NOT work with high power levels like a transmitter, tuner, or SWR/wattmeter would. So if core saturation and excess heating are not an issue, is there any particular reason I MUST use iron powder instead of ferrites? Jason Hsu, AG4DG |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
Iron powder vs. ferrite cores for low-power inductors | Homebrew | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Purchasing Ferrite Cores for Balums | Antenna |