Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There seems to be some difference of opinion on how to properly
terminate Tayoe detectors (and other similar circuits) at audio frequencies. See the following published examples: (1)G0BBL et al (QRP2001): load resistors are 220 ohms (2)Hans Summers: load resistors are 1k (3)9A2HL (on Hans Summers' website): Approx. 0 ohms, detector goes directly to op-amp pins (4)AC5OG (recent QEX series, Part 1): Approx. 0 ohms, detector goes directly to op-amp pins (5)AC5OG (recent QEX series, Part 4): 60 megohms (doubly balanced circuit). In addition references 1-3 use a series 47 ohm resistor at the input of the detector, which seems unnecssary to me - the 50 ohm antenna should perform the function of the filter resistor, shouldn't it ? I did some Spice modelling and found that my detector was well matched to the 50 ohm RF source for audio load resistances of a few hundred ohms (470 ohms worked well), and the conversion loss was a bit more than 3 dB when matched. With somewhat lower resistances the match was not as good but the conversion loss was reduced - 220 ohms may be close to optimum for both reasonable input match to 50 ohms and conversion loss. With higher (and much lower) resistances both conversion loss and input match degraded. The integrator capacitors were 0.1uF in this model. Note that I am defining conversion loss as the relationship between the total power delivered to the 4 load resistances and the forward power at the input. With high load resistances the voltage at each load is indeed closer to the input voltage than for lower load resistances, but most of the power incident at the mixer is reflected back to the antenna. Therefore the conversion loss (defined in terms of power, which is what matters for noise figure) goes up. I would be interested in the comments of those of you with some experience with these detectors. Also, can I assume (for the purpose of computing noise figure of the audio preamps) that the source impedance seen by the audio amps is simply equal to the load resistance that gives the best match at the mixer input ? Steve, VE3SMA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
max power transfer theorem | Antenna | |||
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
Tayloe Mixer Resistance Questions | Homebrew |