Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not trying to be difficult Michael. The reason I have trouble
seeing how this is a money making venture is the low price of cell phones and pagers. When a Cell phone lists for $99, how much time can a technician really spend fixing it? In the repair business, the maximum repair price you can charge a customer has to be less than 40% of the cost of new, or they will always walk away. If they walk away, and give you their phones for free, then perhaps you could make a little bit fixing it and selling it, but really, now, tracphone sells refurbished nokia 5185i's for $39. There is not much margine in that. Who pays for the time necessary for the technician to open the phone, diagnose the problem, unsolder the offending module, test the phone, reassemble, and pack? You would have to pay your technicians less than $10 per hour! -Chuck Michael A. Terrell wrote: Chuck Harris wrote: I know a guy that repairs pagers, but you cannot convince me that it is a profitable business.... The way he moaned about the cost of my fixing his RF signal generator gives me a clue. -Chuck Believe what you want, but the place has around 100 employees, and was looking at buying the old L3-Com/Microdyne complex to expand into its 120,000+ square feet of buildings and acres of land for parking. They are bigger than Microdyne was when it closed the complex and moved to Pennsylvania. If there is no money in repairing pager and cell phones, why do they want to buy property which is priced at 1.6 million dollars? Here is the listing for the complex: http://www.foxfirerealty.com/showlis...tid=17779&id=2 |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not trying to be difficult Michael. The reason I have trouble
seeing how this is a money making venture is the low price of cell phones and pagers. When a Cell phone lists for $99, how much time can a technician really spend fixing it? In the repair business, the maximum repair price you can charge a customer has to be less than 40% of the cost of new, or they will always walk away. If they walk away, and give you their phones for free, then perhaps you could make a little bit fixing it and selling it, but really, now, tracphone sells refurbished nokia 5185i's for $39. There is not much margine in that. Who pays for the time necessary for the technician to open the phone, diagnose the problem, unsolder the offending module, test the phone, reassemble, and pack? You would have to pay your technicians less than $10 per hour! -Chuck Michael A. Terrell wrote: Chuck Harris wrote: I know a guy that repairs pagers, but you cannot convince me that it is a profitable business.... The way he moaned about the cost of my fixing his RF signal generator gives me a clue. -Chuck Believe what you want, but the place has around 100 employees, and was looking at buying the old L3-Com/Microdyne complex to expand into its 120,000+ square feet of buildings and acres of land for parking. They are bigger than Microdyne was when it closed the complex and moved to Pennsylvania. If there is no money in repairing pager and cell phones, why do they want to buy property which is priced at 1.6 million dollars? Here is the listing for the complex: http://www.foxfirerealty.com/showlis...tid=17779&id=2 |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Harris wrote:
I'm not trying to be difficult Michael. The reason I have trouble seeing how this is a money making venture is the low price of cell phones and pagers. When a Cell phone lists for $99, how much time can a technician really spend fixing it? In the repair business, the maximum repair price you can charge a customer has to be less than 40% of the cost of new, or they will always walk away. If they walk away, and give you their phones for free, then perhaps you could make a little bit fixing it and selling it, but really, now, tracphone sells refurbished nokia 5185i's for $39. There is not much margine in that. Who pays for the time necessary for the technician to open the phone, diagnose the problem, unsolder the offending module, test the phone, reassemble, and pack? You would have to pay your technicians less than $10 per hour! -Chuck It is run like a factory, not one up repairs. That makes a huge difference. The techs don't disassemble the units. the production people do a quick test, clean up the cases, and send the boards to be repaired. A lot of repairs are new crystals, or reprogramming the synthesizer, or replacing a bad LCD display which is done before a tech sees it. Also, they do large runs of the same unit, then do a different model. Also, some only need a few pieces of the case replaced, and the password cracked so it can be reprogrammed in the field. They have service contracts where someone ships a 1000 pagers or 100 cell phones and they repair what they can in a fixed time. They either return the bad units, or replace them with their own stock of repaired units, depending on the contract. they also repair a lot of older models and sell them overseas. -- Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Harris wrote:
I'm not trying to be difficult Michael. The reason I have trouble seeing how this is a money making venture is the low price of cell phones and pagers. When a Cell phone lists for $99, how much time can a technician really spend fixing it? In the repair business, the maximum repair price you can charge a customer has to be less than 40% of the cost of new, or they will always walk away. If they walk away, and give you their phones for free, then perhaps you could make a little bit fixing it and selling it, but really, now, tracphone sells refurbished nokia 5185i's for $39. There is not much margine in that. Who pays for the time necessary for the technician to open the phone, diagnose the problem, unsolder the offending module, test the phone, reassemble, and pack? You would have to pay your technicians less than $10 per hour! -Chuck It is run like a factory, not one up repairs. That makes a huge difference. The techs don't disassemble the units. the production people do a quick test, clean up the cases, and send the boards to be repaired. A lot of repairs are new crystals, or reprogramming the synthesizer, or replacing a bad LCD display which is done before a tech sees it. Also, they do large runs of the same unit, then do a different model. Also, some only need a few pieces of the case replaced, and the password cracked so it can be reprogrammed in the field. They have service contracts where someone ships a 1000 pagers or 100 cell phones and they repair what they can in a fixed time. They either return the bad units, or replace them with their own stock of repaired units, depending on the contract. they also repair a lot of older models and sell them overseas. -- Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Harris" wrote in message ... Ed Price wrote: Designing and building a product to provide many years of use, and then capable of being repaired without access to unique components and/or exotic service equipment, is a concept so rare as to be thought a scam. Ed wb6wsn Imagine your cell phone if it was designed to be repaired, and used only common components. It would be the size of a briefcase. Do you think cell phones would be popular if they had to be briefcase sized? What about spectrum analyzers that needed to be contained in several 6 foot high rack cabinets? Is the world better or worse now that a 100MHz oscilloscope can be made the size of a paper back book? -Chuck, WA3UQV We were talking about repair and service equipment, not consumer items. A consumer item is expected to have a short life-cycle, and repairability is often not a concern. I never saw "multi-six-foot-rack analyzers"; the oldest & biggest I can recall were Singer FIM analyzers, which were about 24" wide by 30" tall and deep, and took four guys to move them (and the plug-in RF heads were a one-man lift!). OTOH, everything inside was reachable and easily repairable. If that 100 MHz scope can be built to have a reasonable cost to lifetime ratio, then it could be considered a consumer item, and a non-repairable investment. But to me, if I have to pay $10k or more for a piece of test equipment, it had better last quite a few years and allow me to do re-calibration and even moderately severe repair. Ed |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Harris" wrote in message ... Ed Price wrote: Designing and building a product to provide many years of use, and then capable of being repaired without access to unique components and/or exotic service equipment, is a concept so rare as to be thought a scam. Ed wb6wsn Imagine your cell phone if it was designed to be repaired, and used only common components. It would be the size of a briefcase. Do you think cell phones would be popular if they had to be briefcase sized? What about spectrum analyzers that needed to be contained in several 6 foot high rack cabinets? Is the world better or worse now that a 100MHz oscilloscope can be made the size of a paper back book? -Chuck, WA3UQV We were talking about repair and service equipment, not consumer items. A consumer item is expected to have a short life-cycle, and repairability is often not a concern. I never saw "multi-six-foot-rack analyzers"; the oldest & biggest I can recall were Singer FIM analyzers, which were about 24" wide by 30" tall and deep, and took four guys to move them (and the plug-in RF heads were a one-man lift!). OTOH, everything inside was reachable and easily repairable. If that 100 MHz scope can be built to have a reasonable cost to lifetime ratio, then it could be considered a consumer item, and a non-repairable investment. But to me, if I have to pay $10k or more for a piece of test equipment, it had better last quite a few years and allow me to do re-calibration and even moderately severe repair. Ed |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "gw" wrote in message om... "Ed Price" wrote in message news:nO_tb.9428$cX1.8536@fed1read02... "gw" wrote in message om... Roy Lewallen wrote in message ... Thanks to Ed for the good advice. I've got an HP 140T. As far as I know, the only difference between it and the 141T is that the CRT in mine is a conventional one with long-persistence phosphor rather than a storage tube. It uses the same plug-in units as the 141T. I find it to be very usable, and don't really miss storage capability at all. I think the tube is a lot more trouble-free than a storage type unit. So I recommend that you don't turn down a 140T if you come across one -- and you might even have a better chance of getting a unit with a working display than with a 141T. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Ed Price wrote: [Lots of good advice] well it is amazing i think how some of these units retain their resale value even though the companies that made them do not service them or back them......man who was the brainiac that thought about how to implement this scam? Designing and building a product to provide many years of use, and then capable of being repaired without access to unique components and/or exotic service equipment, is a concept so rare as to be thought a scam. Ed wb6wsn well ed what are your thoughts on a hp 8590? bueno o no bueno? A very good analyzer series, but generally still priced out of the hobbyist market. Reasonably portable, and ruggedly built. Performance is generally a bit lower than the 856x series, but still very respectable. Much more useful than a hobbyist-affordable 141 analyzer, and easier and more versatile than an older 8569 analyzer. Unless your needs are exotic, the 859x series will be a good industrial choice. Ed wb6wsn |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "gw" wrote in message om... "Ed Price" wrote in message news:nO_tb.9428$cX1.8536@fed1read02... "gw" wrote in message om... Roy Lewallen wrote in message ... Thanks to Ed for the good advice. I've got an HP 140T. As far as I know, the only difference between it and the 141T is that the CRT in mine is a conventional one with long-persistence phosphor rather than a storage tube. It uses the same plug-in units as the 141T. I find it to be very usable, and don't really miss storage capability at all. I think the tube is a lot more trouble-free than a storage type unit. So I recommend that you don't turn down a 140T if you come across one -- and you might even have a better chance of getting a unit with a working display than with a 141T. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Ed Price wrote: [Lots of good advice] well it is amazing i think how some of these units retain their resale value even though the companies that made them do not service them or back them......man who was the brainiac that thought about how to implement this scam? Designing and building a product to provide many years of use, and then capable of being repaired without access to unique components and/or exotic service equipment, is a concept so rare as to be thought a scam. Ed wb6wsn well ed what are your thoughts on a hp 8590? bueno o no bueno? A very good analyzer series, but generally still priced out of the hobbyist market. Reasonably portable, and ruggedly built. Performance is generally a bit lower than the 856x series, but still very respectable. Much more useful than a hobbyist-affordable 141 analyzer, and easier and more versatile than an older 8569 analyzer. Unless your needs are exotic, the 859x series will be a good industrial choice. Ed wb6wsn |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Burridge" wrote in message ... On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:30:40 -0800, "Ed Price" wrote: Designing and building a product to provide many years of use, and then capable of being repaired without access to unique components and/or exotic service equipment, is a concept so rare as to be thought a scam. Can anyone recommend a decent commercial vector network analyser and spectrum analyser that one can repair oneself if necessary and hopefully keep them up and running for ever? -- "I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it." - Winston Churchill For the spectrum analyzer part, the best a hobbyist can usually afford is an HP-141, with a few plug-ins (IIRC, they offered a total of 6, collect the whole set!). And you will need the HP manuals (some of which are available free from the US Army LOGSA site). And you will need some other basic and decent lab gear (scope, counter, DMM, sig gens) to do the job right. Sorry, but I can't comment on any Network Analyzers. Ed wb6wsn |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Burridge" wrote in message ... On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:30:40 -0800, "Ed Price" wrote: Designing and building a product to provide many years of use, and then capable of being repaired without access to unique components and/or exotic service equipment, is a concept so rare as to be thought a scam. Can anyone recommend a decent commercial vector network analyser and spectrum analyser that one can repair oneself if necessary and hopefully keep them up and running for ever? -- "I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it." - Winston Churchill For the spectrum analyzer part, the best a hobbyist can usually afford is an HP-141, with a few plug-ins (IIRC, they offered a total of 6, collect the whole set!). And you will need the HP manuals (some of which are available free from the US Army LOGSA site). And you will need some other basic and decent lab gear (scope, counter, DMM, sig gens) to do the job right. Sorry, but I can't comment on any Network Analyzers. Ed wb6wsn |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tektronix 7403N 'scope manual | Boatanchors | |||
Wanted: Old Tektronix Equipment | Boatanchors | |||
Tektronix oscilloscope | Antenna | |||
Tektronix SUCKS!!!!! | Boatanchors | |||
Tektronix DOESN'T suck - | Boatanchors |