On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:47:27 +0000, Gerry Bilt wrote:


Morons-'R'-U, I guess, especially as the remark wasn't addressed to
you.

as previously predicted.
the displayed attitude towards
properly qualified a-licensees is a disgrace
and only goes to predict what kind of behaviour
will in time show up on 40m once someone says that their
callsign is g3 or g4 or even g0.

hopefully the g2's will be treated with utmost respect
regardless of the topic of conversation.

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
The only exception to the attributes of the KW2000
which I'd modify is the 200kHz wide bands.


Can't you cope with modern technology?

The KW wasn't even good for its day.

Is this why you keep getting sacked?

GW

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
The only exception to the attributes of the KW2000
which I'd modify is the 200kHz wide bands.


Can't you cope with modern technology?

The KW wasn't even good for its day.

Is this why you keep getting sacked?

GW

"The Sperminator" [email protected] wrote in message
...

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...

DSP for the audio and mixing stages, perhaps
with a low IF of ooo 50kHz to resolve the ringing
problems that arise in narrow baseband filters
for CW.


Airy, giving advice on DSP...

BWWWWWWWWWWhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahaha

Or any advice.

A KW2000 with that works on the "RF bands"

73s de

GW

"The Sperminator" [email protected] wrote in message
...

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...

DSP for the audio and mixing stages, perhaps
with a low IF of ooo 50kHz to resolve the ringing
problems that arise in narrow baseband filters
for CW.


Airy, giving advice on DSP...

BWWWWWWWWWWhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahaha

Or any advice.

A KW2000 with that works on the "RF bands"

73s de

GW

"Graham W" wrote in message
...

snip

You, Airy, could sweep the floor.

Any suggestions where to stick the broom?

J.

"Graham W" wrote in message
...

snip

You, Airy, could sweep the floor.

Any suggestions where to stick the broom?

J.

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
So you agree that there are problems?

The problems are with you, not the kit
Marco



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 18/03/2004

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
So you agree that there are problems?

The problems are with you, not the kit
Marco



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 18/03/2004

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design
for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices
and experienced constructors alike?

I suggest that none of the CB-style gadgets of today's
CB-style rigs are necessary and that a reproducible design
having only the facilities of, say, the KW2000, would provide the
basis of any station.

Keeping it simple will increase the chance of success.

I suggest the following....
DDS VFO
VFO display based upon graphic LCD to simulate
the use of a tuning knob-plus-dial.
Tuning knob plus flywheel using optical sensors,
giving the "Feel" associated with traditional rigs.

DSP for the audio and mixing stages, perhaps
with a low IF of ooo 50kHz to resolve the ringing
problems that arise in narrow baseband filters
for CW.

ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA
for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or
running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams.

Any of the established CB types in this NG are welcome to join
this discussion, I only ask that your contributions be
meaningful and not the inane sneering 'n; jeering for which
you are famous.

Bring back the G2DAF rx/tx I say.

johnny g3liv.