Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
Old May 6th 04, 06:56 PM
Highland Ham
 
Posts: n/a
Default

THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?

==================================
Mind in-&output capacitances ,which add-on when parallelling.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH



  #52   Report Post  
Old May 6th 04, 07:05 PM
Tim Wescott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Highland Ham wrote:
THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?


==================================
Mind in-&output capacitances ,which add-on when parallelling.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH




Not to mention that "critical layout".

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
  #53   Report Post  
Old May 6th 04, 07:05 PM
Tim Wescott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Highland Ham wrote:
THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?


==================================
Mind in-&output capacitances ,which add-on when parallelling.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH




Not to mention that "critical layout".

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
  #54   Report Post  
Old May 6th 04, 10:34 PM
Paul Burridge
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 6 May 2004 17:56:06 +0100, "Highland Ham"
wrote:

THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?

==================================
Mind in-&output capacitances ,which add-on when parallelling.


Indeed, but there must be some current-pumping circuit that might
assist here?
--

The BBC: licenced at public expense to spread lies.
  #55   Report Post  
Old May 6th 04, 10:34 PM
Paul Burridge
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 6 May 2004 17:56:06 +0100, "Highland Ham"
wrote:

THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?

==================================
Mind in-&output capacitances ,which add-on when parallelling.


Indeed, but there must be some current-pumping circuit that might
assist here?
--

The BBC: licenced at public expense to spread lies.


  #56   Report Post  
Old May 6th 04, 11:15 PM
R J Carpenter
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Walter Harley" wrote in message
...

Modern commercial radio transmitters (including FM band, 88-108MHz) by,
e.g., Harris use MOSFETs. So clearly it is possible to get up to 25kW.
I believe they also use them in 100kW AM band transmitters. A bit of
meandering on Harris' web page will tell you more.


I rather doubt that there are any tube-type 50 kW AM broadcast band
transmitters sold these days. The 50 kW solid state Harris unit seems to be
extremely widely used. Such transmitters use lots of hot-swappable
modules - and can operate quite well with a few modules removed. At least
some of these high-power AM rigs are essentially huge D-to-A converters.
Look in the IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting for some ideas.

The 88-108 MHz units are conventional amplifiers, made of a number of
modules and combiners.

The trick in the near future is adding IBOC digital to these rigs without
non-linearities and unacceptable mixing products. Although "digital", the RF
is of course analog in nature. I gather that solid state rigs accommodating
IBOC were at the NAB show a couple of weeks ago.

When WTOP was running IBOC tests on 1500 kHz I don't know whether they were
using their main solid state 50 kW Harris rig or the tube Continental 50 kW
backup.


  #57   Report Post  
Old May 6th 04, 11:15 PM
R J Carpenter
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Walter Harley" wrote in message
...

Modern commercial radio transmitters (including FM band, 88-108MHz) by,
e.g., Harris use MOSFETs. So clearly it is possible to get up to 25kW.
I believe they also use them in 100kW AM band transmitters. A bit of
meandering on Harris' web page will tell you more.


I rather doubt that there are any tube-type 50 kW AM broadcast band
transmitters sold these days. The 50 kW solid state Harris unit seems to be
extremely widely used. Such transmitters use lots of hot-swappable
modules - and can operate quite well with a few modules removed. At least
some of these high-power AM rigs are essentially huge D-to-A converters.
Look in the IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting for some ideas.

The 88-108 MHz units are conventional amplifiers, made of a number of
modules and combiners.

The trick in the near future is adding IBOC digital to these rigs without
non-linearities and unacceptable mixing products. Although "digital", the RF
is of course analog in nature. I gather that solid state rigs accommodating
IBOC were at the NAB show a couple of weeks ago.

When WTOP was running IBOC tests on 1500 kHz I don't know whether they were
using their main solid state 50 kW Harris rig or the tube Continental 50 kW
backup.


  #58   Report Post  
Old May 7th 04, 02:49 AM
Tam/WB2TT
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Walter Harley" wrote in message
...
"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 05 May 2004 20:13:01 -0400, Ken Scharf
wrote:

Mosfets in the MRF5xx series (511, 521 for example) have been used
up to the 10 meter band with good results. A pair of them can give
at least 50w pep output. Depending on the input/output circuitry
used and the transistor they require 12-28v power supply. Layout
is somewhat critical.


THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?


Modern commercial radio transmitters (including FM band, 88-108MHz) by,
e.g., Harris use MOSFETs. So clearly it is possible to get up to 25kW. I
believe they also use them in 100kW AM band transmitters. A bit of
meandering on Harris' web page will tell you more.


Their AM transmitter combines the outputs of 60 some modules to get the
instantanous PEP they need. All modules are fed the same square wave signal,
and modules run class E (I think). They don't say what the sampling rate is,
but I would guess ~20 KHz. There is a WLW related web site that has more
info than the Harris site. If I run across it again, I will post it.

Tam


  #59   Report Post  
Old May 7th 04, 02:49 AM
Tam/WB2TT
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Walter Harley" wrote in message
...
"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 05 May 2004 20:13:01 -0400, Ken Scharf
wrote:

Mosfets in the MRF5xx series (511, 521 for example) have been used
up to the 10 meter band with good results. A pair of them can give
at least 50w pep output. Depending on the input/output circuitry
used and the transistor they require 12-28v power supply. Layout
is somewhat critical.


THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?


Modern commercial radio transmitters (including FM band, 88-108MHz) by,
e.g., Harris use MOSFETs. So clearly it is possible to get up to 25kW. I
believe they also use them in 100kW AM band transmitters. A bit of
meandering on Harris' web page will tell you more.


Their AM transmitter combines the outputs of 60 some modules to get the
instantanous PEP they need. All modules are fed the same square wave signal,
and modules run class E (I think). They don't say what the sampling rate is,
but I would guess ~20 KHz. There is a WLW related web site that has more
info than the Harris site. If I run across it again, I will post it.

Tam


  #60   Report Post  
Old May 7th 04, 08:47 AM
Paul Keinanen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 6 May 2004 21:13:57 GMT, "Walter Harley"
wrote:

THanks, very interesting. I wonder if anyone's tried paralleling up
half a dozen of 'em for more power?


Directly parallelling the semiconductors have several drawbacks. First
of all, the capacitances are in parallel thus limiting the frequency
response. Also load sharing between the semiconductors can be hard to
achieve.

Modern commercial radio transmitters (including FM band, 88-108MHz) by,
e.g., Harris use MOSFETs. So clearly it is possible to get up to 25kW. I
believe they also use them in 100kW AM band transmitters. A bit of
meandering on Harris' web page will tell you more.


They are complete amplifier modules with well specified output
impedances that are combined. If e.g. Wilkinson dividers/combiners are
used, these have a limited bandwidth, but this is usually not a big
issue in broadcasting, in which the frequency remains the same and if
changes are needed, the relative frequency range is limited.

However, Wilkinson dividers and combiners would not be suitable for
1.8-50 MHz amateur linear amplifier due to the huge relative frequency
range.

Paul OH3LWR

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: JRL-2000F 1KW SOLID STATE HF LINEAR AMPLIFIER Asa Cannell Equipment 0 August 22nd 04 07:41 PM
RF amps: tuned load in Class A? Don Pearce Homebrew 141 September 15th 03 06:02 AM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 03:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017