On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:38:09 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 04:59:46 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
I would really believe this is a gag if you hadn't already shown that
you have the mentality of a neocon.

??
Example?

I went on a quest.

Sheesh. OK, you're showing the same mentality by your blockheadedness
about the electricity.

I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

So, sorry if I got the wrong guy, but upon reviewing the thread,
if it ain't a gag that you're really dragging out, in which case,
either congratulations or you should be ashamed of yourself, but
if not, then you're one of the most stubborn, blockheaded people
I've ever encountered, republican _or_ democrat!

Does this clear things up a bit?

Thanks,
Rich

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:43:22 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer wrote:

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:38:09 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 04:59:46 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
I would really believe this is a gag if you hadn't already shown that
you have the mentality of a neocon.

??
Example?

I went on a quest.

Sheesh. OK, you're showing the same mentality by your blockheadedness
about the electricity.

I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

So, sorry if I got the wrong guy, but upon reviewing the thread,
if it ain't a gag that you're really dragging out, in which case,
either congratulations or you should be ashamed of yourself, but
if not, then you're one of the most stubborn, blockheaded people
I've ever encountered, republican _or_ democrat!

Does this clear things up a bit?


Maybe I can explain. Paul is basically a moron when it comes to
electronics - real slow on the uptake, engineering math challenged,
Jerry's kid. He probably OP'd this thread without thinking of the
work required to move those f*cking electrons - the more you move in
a given time, the more power you consume. Goes back to mechanics and
horsepower. OTOH, he *is* a f*cking troll, basically, so you might
just ignore him. I sometimes look at the responses to him because
you never know when someone's gonna blast him (like you're getting
close to doing) and sometimes (not this time) it's good for a
chuckle. 'specially after a few good Long Islands

--
Best Regards,
Mike

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:37:27 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:

On 14 Nov 2004 12:35:00 -0800, (Mike Silva)
wrote:

Paul Burridge wrote in message . ..

I use no current and they effectively supply no voltage. Why do I get
billed for electricity usage when I clearly can't have used any?

Because if you don't they'll turn off their non-voltage and
non-current and you won't like the difference (even though there isn't
any).

You're probably right. Sigh... I still think I'm a dumbass sucker,
though. But at least no one seems to agree with me on that.

They do on the dumbass part.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:43:22 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
wrote:

I went on a quest.

Sheesh. OK, you're showing the same mentality by your blockheadedness
about the electricity.

Er, you seriously didn't realise I was trolling?? How *stoopid* do you
think I am? No, don't answer that. ;-)

I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

So, sorry if I got the wrong guy, but upon reviewing the thread,
if it ain't a gag that you're really dragging out, in which case,
either congratulations

Thanks.

or you should be ashamed of yourself, but
if not, then you're one of the most stubborn, blockheaded people
I've ever encountered, republican _or_ democrat!

Does this clear things up a bit?

Not really. I'm neither republican nor democrat. I'm a Britlander so
those terms are inapplicable. My politics are actually quite
middle-of-the-road and moderate, actually. Not that we should be
discussing such things here, anyway.
HTH.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:43:22 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
wrote:


I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

---
"Neocon" as a ****raction for "neoconservative", or what?
---

So, sorry if I got the wrong guy, but upon reviewing the thread,
if it ain't a gag that you're really dragging out, in which case,
either congratulations or you should be ashamed of yourself, but
if not, then you're one of the most stubborn, blockheaded people
I've ever encountered, republican _or_ democrat!

---
Bwahahahahaha!!! IKYABWAI if I ever heard one!! Thanks for the larf!
---

Does this clear things up a bit?

---
A bunch!

--
John Fields

Paul Burridge wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 19:37:28 -0500, **THE-RFI-EMI-GUY**
wrote:

Paul; You could drive ground rods into opposite corners of your property
and extract some of the power from the earth and run your house for
nothing at all! In fact If you dig a deep enough trench in the middle,
you could isolate the ground and get a bigger return current!

Well, I don't see how that could work, but I had considered digging a
trench around my boundary and thereby cutting off the return path for
the other users' behind my house and demanding payment from the power
co. to re-instate it. But then it's obvious the return current's only
going to go deeper underground or around my property. It seems there's
nothing I can do to make any dough out of this. :-(

Not sure, but somehwere it has to be stated that electric company MUST
provide an escape route for electrons they supllied to customers,
otherwise they will blow up your house in an eyeblink (assume you try
to steal their electrons). That's the only reason for the bill.

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:53:32 -0500, Active8 wrote:

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:43:22 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer wrote:

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:38:09 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 04:59:46 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
I would really believe this is a gag if you hadn't already shown that
you have the mentality of a neocon.

??
Example?

I went on a quest.

Sheesh. OK, you're showing the same mentality by your blockheadedness
about the electricity.

I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

So, sorry if I got the wrong guy, but upon reviewing the thread,
if it ain't a gag that you're really dragging out, in which case,
either congratulations or you should be ashamed of yourself, but
if not, then you're one of the most stubborn, blockheaded people
I've ever encountered, republican _or_ democrat!

Does this clear things up a bit?


Maybe I can explain. Paul is basically a moron when it comes to
electronics - real slow on the uptake, engineering math challenged,
Jerry's kid. He probably OP'd this thread without thinking of the
work required to move those f*cking electrons - the more you move in
a given time, the more power you consume. Goes back to mechanics and
horsepower. OTOH, he *is* a f*cking troll, basically, so you might
just ignore him. I sometimes look at the responses to him because
you never know when someone's gonna blast him (like you're getting
close to doing) and sometimes (not this time) it's good for a
chuckle. 'specially after a few good Long Islands

Well, I admit I got kinda confused when I went to google groups
and each time I spotted him chiming in on the election frenzy,
he was on the opposite side from the last time. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:59:35 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:43:22 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
wrote:

I went on a quest.

Sheesh. OK, you're showing the same mentality by your blockheadedness
about the electricity.

Er, you seriously didn't realise I was trolling?? How *stoopid* do you
think I am? No, don't answer that. ;-)

I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

So, sorry if I got the wrong guy, but upon reviewing the thread,
if it ain't a gag that you're really dragging out, in which case,
either congratulations

Thanks.

or you should be ashamed of yourself, but
if not, then you're one of the most stubborn, blockheaded people
I've ever encountered, republican _or_ democrat!

Does this clear things up a bit?

Not really. I'm neither republican nor democrat. I'm a Britlander so
those terms are inapplicable. My politics are actually quite
middle-of-the-road and moderate, actually. Not that we should be
discussing such things here, anyway.
HTH.

ID. ;-) This also explains my confusion when, while going through
google groups on author: Burridge I found way less political stuff
from you than I had had the impression that I had seen. Like, one
percent of what I had thought. :-)

So, sorry if I broke your game. )-;

Cheers!
Rich

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:30:13 -0600, John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:43:22 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
wrote:


I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

---
"Neocon" as a ****raction for "neoconservative", or what?

No, a contraction.

Thanks,
Rich

Rich The Philosophizer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:30:13 -0600, John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:43:22 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
wrote:


I came up with "neocon" because of election hangover, and probably
confused names because of the frenzy.

---
"Neocon" as a ****raction for "neoconservative", or what?

No, a contraction.

I think he meant the ****raction, just as in "Good evening, ****stable,
I was not speeding at all."

Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.