"Airy R.Bean" wrote in message
...
Whatever you say about your K2, it is a proprietary design,
and thus no different from the YaesKenIcom products, and
therefore is off-the-shelf

The essence of Ham Radio is that we produce and maintain
our own designs and are not beholden to any commercial
operation that has its sights set on the shekels.

I'm not interested in a comparison with commercial gear. The
idea is to design a transceiver that is easily reproducible by
beginners, and which is future-proofed by having the
interface between stages well-specified so that you could,
for example, substitute your own mixing stages.

Please list all projects you have designed and completed, radio or
otherwise.

Have they even been published? Surely a man of you 'expertise' could put
them on the internet.

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:04:58 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:

I don't follow URL's from Usenet - it is a bad debating style
to send your correspondents off to do reading. if you have
something of value to say, then please say it yourself.

groan

But if it's someone else's work, it is only correct to point to it.
After all, you might have a different interpretation of it....sheesh!
--
from
Aero Spike

"Spike" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:04:58 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:

I don't follow URL's from Usenet - it is a bad debating style
to send your correspondents off to do reading. if you have
something of value to say, then please say it yourself.

groan

But if it's someone else's work, it is only correct to point to it.
After all, you might have a different interpretation of it....sheesh!

Standard practice for Gareth, has been so for years. Way back to the TMC
days. If he avoids research he can pretend it wasn't his fault when it goes
belly up.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:00:12 -0000, "Nimrod" wrote:


"Spike" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:04:58 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:

I don't follow URL's from Usenet - it is a bad debating style
to send your correspondents off to do reading. if you have
something of value to say, then please say it yourself.

groan

But if it's someone else's work, it is only correct to point to it.
After all, you might have a different interpretation of it....sheesh!

Standard practice for Gareth, has been so for years. Way back to the TMC
days. If he avoids research he can pretend it wasn't his fault when it goes
belly up.


Yes....When he was a student at his avant-garde university in the
turbulent sixties, I'll bet he never said to his lecturers "it is a
bad debating style to send your students off to do reading, if you
have something of value to say".
--
from
Aero Spike

Here in New York -- we say Foo Get Bout It

This is 2005 not 1927


--
Caveat Lector

Greteings, one and all!


Airy R.Bean wrote:

I'm not proposing anything like that. I don't know
anything about the K2.

Thereby showing the massive extent of his ignorance. Anyone propounding
to know anything about developments in amateur (not 'HAM') radio during
the past decade who doesn't know anything about the K2 is of course not
worth the space he takes up: and most certainly not the air that he
breaths.

To paraphrase poor Airy - the Ignorant Prat reveals his true nature
every time he opens his mouth.

Regards,

Mr Wibble

"Airy R.Bean" wrote in message
...
I'm not proposing anything like that. I don't know
anything about the K2.


Something else you know nothing about. That list keeps growing Gareth. Have
you thought of studying at all?

You have plenty of time on your hands. (Your posting times suggest you are
not working at the moment.)

Airy R. Bean wrote:

-- the usual crap --

DON'T FEED THE TROLL!

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Mr.Westcott once again demonstrates his infantile personality.

Grow up, Mr.Westcott!

"Tim Wescott" wrote in message
...
Airy R. Bean wrote:

-- the usual crap --

DON'T FEED THE TROLL!

Suggest you look at:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/....amateur/about

There you will se that there are less than 100 users of this NG of
which only 10 are regular posters (of which you are one). The other
nine all hate you, so I'd say your chances are slim to none (and Slim's
on holiday).