Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airy R.Bean wrote:
There is no national magazine for Radio Hams in Britland, unless you mean Practical Wireless. No other magazine is widely available to all who wish to purchase it. The muppet demonstrates his silly attitude when challenged once more. You know which magazine he means old Bean - except it's the official organ of an organisation you despise so much. Such pathetic and childish behaviour for a man in his 50s! David. |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Edmonds" wrote in message ... Airy R.Bean wrote: As I've said before, apart from the DSP, I and other radio amateurs have radios here that match your criteria, so why should we bother? Funny you should mention DSP, David, Airys theory on this subject is legendary. Google DSP and Airy, within this forum and the results will keep you amused for hours! Regards tox |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:00:12 -0000, "Nimrod" wrote:
"Spike" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:04:58 -0000, "Airy R.Bean" wrote: I don't follow URL's from Usenet - it is a bad debating style to send your correspondents off to do reading. if you have something of value to say, then please say it yourself. groan But if it's someone else's work, it is only correct to point to it. After all, you might have a different interpretation of it....sheesh! Standard practice for Gareth, has been so for years. Way back to the TMC days. If he avoids research he can pretend it wasn't his fault when it goes belly up. Yes....When he was a student at his avant-garde university in the turbulent sixties, I'll bet he never said to his lecturers "it is a bad debating style to send your students off to do reading, if you have something of value to say". -- from Aero Spike |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here in New York -- we say Foo Get Bout It
This is 2005 not 1927 -- Caveat Lector |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Airy R.Bean" wrote in message ... Whatever you say about your K2, it is a proprietary design, and thus no different from the YaesKenIcom products, and therefore is off-the-shelf The essence of Ham Radio is that we produce and maintain our own designs and are not beholden to any commercial operation that has its sights set on the shekels. I'm not interested in a comparison with commercial gear. The idea is to design a transceiver that is easily reproducible by beginners, and which is future-proofed by having the interface between stages well-specified so that you could, for example, substitute your own mixing stages. Please list all projects you have designed and completed, radio or otherwise. Have they even been published? Surely a man of you 'expertise' could put them on the internet. |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Caveat Lector" wrote in message news:HBCEd.50513$8e5.34594@fed1read07... Here in New York -- we say Foo Get Bout It This is 2005 not 1927 Not in bits of Chippenham. |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Spike" wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:00:12 -0000, "Nimrod" wrote: "Spike" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:04:58 -0000, "Airy R.Bean" wrote: I don't follow URL's from Usenet - it is a bad debating style to send your correspondents off to do reading. if you have something of value to say, then please say it yourself. groan But if it's someone else's work, it is only correct to point to it. After all, you might have a different interpretation of it....sheesh! Standard practice for Gareth, has been so for years. Way back to the TMC days. If he avoids research he can pretend it wasn't his fault when it goes belly up. Yes....When he was a student at his avant-garde university in the turbulent sixties, I'll bet he never said to his lecturers "it is a bad debating style to send your students off to do reading, if you have something of value to say". Maybe he never graduated? That could explain lots of things. Especially his degree envy. |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:04:59 -0000, "Airy R. Bean"
wrote: .....is that we club together and conceive of a design for an HF transceiver that could form the basis of the station of any budding Radio Ham. Excellent idea. Let's make it a high-quality job, though; uncompromising on sensitivity/selectivity/noise etc. And use ubiquitous, easily-available components that will be around for the foreseeable future to come to permit serviceability over the long term! -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep 6 replies - obviously the other 4 users of this newsgroup have
killfiled you Bean (or are on Hoilday with Slim). |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Therein lies a problem; I had considered the use of 270MHz
SAW filters as used in GSM phones as RX roofing filters, but with the deign of GSM phones moving en masse to direct conversion, that's not possible. One area in which we can assure some degree of future proofing is to define the interfaces between the sections so that any section could be replaced by circuitry of your own making and/or of your own repair. "Paul Burridge" wrote in message ... On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:04:59 -0000, "Airy R. Bean" wrote: .....is that we club together and conceive of a design for an HF transceiver that could form the basis of the station of any budding Radio Ham. Excellent idea. Let's make it a high-quality job, though; uncompromising on sensitivity/selectivity/noise etc. And use ubiquitous, easily-available components that will be around for the foreseeable future to come to permit serviceability over the long term! -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
MAKE 5000.00 PER WEEK | Antenna | |||
fa= Hams Like Cameras also>>VIVITAR V335 35mm CAMERA BODY | Equipment | |||
fa= Hams Like Cameras also>>VIVITAR V335 35mm CAMERA BODY | Equipment |