Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have recently upgraded my deaf HW7 receiver.
Started with the SA612, fed by the very stable , original HW7 vfo, feeding industry standard NE5532 audio chain . Performance was very good for its simplicity, but, the local station, totally blocked my receiver. So, I opted for an AD831 , and found that judging from my ears, not much difference in noise and sensitivity, but, never experienced any blocking , at all, at any time. And, unlike the SA612, BCI , was absent, even with simple antenna input circuit. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23/04/2020 09:56, 9H1FQ wrote:
I have recently upgraded my deaf HW7 receiver. Started with the SA612, fed by the very stable , original HW7 vfo, feeding industry standard NE5532 audio chain . Performance was very good for its simplicity, but, the local station, totally blocked my receiver. So, I opted for an AD831 , and found that judging from my ears, not much difference in noise and sensitivity, but, never experienced any blocking , at all, at any time. And, unlike the SA612, BCI , was absent, even with simple antenna input circuit. I think the SA612 is easy to better. Even an SL6440 can beat it. -- Brian Gregory (in England). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only snag with the AD831 is that is unsuitable for portable work, as it consumes just over 100 mA
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SA612/NE612 - optimal input signal level | Homebrew | |||
Alternatives to ILG? | Shortwave | |||
NE/SA602 VS NE/SA612 | Homebrew | |||
NE/SA602 VS NE/SA612 | Homebrew | |||
Alternatives | General |