Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 28th 05, 10:51 PM
John Fields
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:27:04 -0800, Tim Wescott
wrote:


Furthermore, all of the
literature that I've read on AT cut crystals reports that they vibrate
in the bulk of the crystal, in shear mode -- see figure 7 he
http://literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5965-7662E.pdf.

Perhaps you're thinking of SAW devices?


---
No, I was thinking they vibrated in thickness compression. Thanks for
the correction.

--
John Fields
  #2   Report Post  
Old February 28th 05, 11:09 PM
Larry Brasfield
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tim Wescott" wrote
in message ...
....
In an AT cut crystal the overtone modes are close, but not exactly on, the odd harmonics of the fundamental. Furthermore, all of
the literature that I've read on AT cut crystals reports that they vibrate in the bulk of the crystal, in shear mode -- see figure
7 he http://literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5965-7662E.pdf.


One effect to watch out for with use of unspecified
overtone modes is that the behavior of the resonator
is not ideal; the presence or size of nearby spurs and
the Q depend on how uniform the thickness is that
determines frequency and the placement and size of
contact metal. The wavelength is typically much less
than the dimension along the non-shearing axis, so
having a single mode of resonance near the nominal
frequency or its overtones is not guaranteed, except
by careful construction and verification. So, clearly,
a guarantee about the behavior near the fundamental
resonance cannot be extended to the overtone modes.

If I was trying to build a stable and pure oscillator
operating at a crystal overtone, I would buy the
crystal specified for the overtone I would be using.

--
--Larry Brasfield
email:
Above views may belong only to me.


  #3   Report Post  
Old February 28th 05, 11:26 PM
Tim Wescott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry Brasfield wrote:

"Tim Wescott" wrote
in message ...
...

In an AT cut crystal the overtone modes are close, but not exactly on, the odd harmonics of the fundamental. Furthermore, all of
the literature that I've read on AT cut crystals reports that they vibrate in the bulk of the crystal, in shear mode -- see figure
7 he http://literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5965-7662E.pdf.



One effect to watch out for with use of unspecified
overtone modes is that the behavior of the resonator
is not ideal; the presence or size of nearby spurs and
the Q depend on how uniform the thickness is that
determines frequency and the placement and size of
contact metal. The wavelength is typically much less
than the dimension along the non-shearing axis, so
having a single mode of resonance near the nominal
frequency or its overtones is not guaranteed, except
by careful construction and verification. So, clearly,
a guarantee about the behavior near the fundamental
resonance cannot be extended to the overtone modes.

If I was trying to build a stable and pure oscillator
operating at a crystal overtone, I would buy the
crystal specified for the overtone I would be using.

I pointed that out in a previous post. But hey -- wouldn't it be fun to
have an oscillator that yodels?

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 1st 05, 04:07 PM
Ken Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Tim Wescott wrote:
[....]
I pointed that out in a previous post. But hey -- wouldn't it be fun to
have an oscillator that yodels?


No, it isn't fun. Trust me :

--
--
forging knowledge

  #5   Report Post  
Old March 1st 05, 04:34 PM
Ken Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Tim Wescott wrote:
[...]
In an AT cut crystal the overtone modes are close, but not exactly on,
the odd harmonics of the fundamental. Furthermore, all of the
literature that I've read on AT cut crystals reports that they vibrate
in the bulk of the crystal, in shear mode -- see figure 7 he
http://literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5965-7662E.pdf.


Yes

In the ideal AT cut crystal "c mode" shear is the only activity. In the SC
cut, the "b" and "a" modes appear. The extra complexity of the mode
selection circuit is part of the reason that SC based OCXOs cost so much.

--
--
forging knowledge



  #6   Report Post  
Old March 1st 05, 03:33 AM
RST Engineering
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is total and absolute bullpuckey.

Jim


---
You can use a fundamental mode crystal as an overtone oscillator, but
even if you can get it to oscillate, it won't be generating an
overtone at 100MHz, since overtone modes of oscillation aren't
harmonically related to the fundamental.



  #7   Report Post  
Old March 1st 05, 04:04 AM
Joerg
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello Jim,

That is total and absolute bullpuckey.



Huh? See the 2nd paragraph (mode):

http://www.euroquartz.co.uk/tech-xtal.htm

Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
  #8   Report Post  
Old March 1st 05, 05:31 AM
Terry Given
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RST Engineering wrote:
That is total and absolute bullpuckey.

Jim



---
You can use a fundamental mode crystal as an overtone oscillator, but
even if you can get it to oscillate, it won't be generating an
overtone at 100MHz, since overtone modes of oscillation aren't
harmonically related to the fundamental.


sorry dude, 50 years of IEEE UFFC papers suggest *you* are wrong. I was
surprised when I learned this too.

Cheers
Terry
  #9   Report Post  
Old March 1st 05, 05:12 PM
RST Engineering \(jw\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry, dude, 50 years of designing with crystals, right from when I ground
my first surplus WWII rock on a piece of glass with toothpaste as the
abrasive says that what the original poster asked is correct.

Will the harmonic be precise? No. Will it be "close", which is what the
original poster asked? You bet. Depending on the oscillator circuit, can
it be "pulled" on frequency? Perhaps.

But to say that the crystal doesn't resonate anywhere near the harmonic is,
as I said, bullpuckey.

Jim



"Terry Given" wrote in message
...
RST Engineering wrote:
That is total and absolute bullpuckey.

Jim


sorry dude, 50 years of IEEE UFFC papers suggest *you* are wrong. I was
surprised when I learned this too.

Cheers
Terry



  #10   Report Post  
Old March 1st 05, 05:57 PM
John Fields
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:12:48 -0800, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
wrote:

Sorry, dude, 50 years of designing with crystals, right from when I ground
my first surplus WWII rock on a piece of glass with toothpaste as the
abrasive says that what the original poster asked is correct.

Will the harmonic be precise? No. Will it be "close", which is what the
original poster asked? You bet. Depending on the oscillator circuit, can
it be "pulled" on frequency? Perhaps.

But to say that the crystal doesn't resonate anywhere near the harmonic is,
as I said, bullpuckey.


---
Sorry, dude, no matter how much time you've got in, if you go back
and read my post, you'll find that I wrote:

"You can use a fundamental mode crystal as an overtone oscillator, but
even if you can get it to oscillate, it won't be generating an
overtone at 100MHz, since overtone modes of oscillation aren't
harmonically related to the fundamental."


and that you replied with:


"That is total and absolute bullpuckey."


Notice that I didn't say "near", I said "at".

If you can find fault with anything I wrote in that post, I'd
appreciate specific criticism instead of that broad brush you painted
with.

--
John Fields


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Make your own T2FD Kees Shortwave 75 July 2nd 04 08:54 AM
We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. Expeditionradio Policy 43 February 8th 04 09:47 PM
BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO Expeditionradio Policy 3 January 27th 04 11:50 PM
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade Gene Gardner Homebrew 0 January 13th 04 06:28 PM
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE http://CBC.am/ Shortwave 0 July 16th 03 09:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017