"Polymath" wrote in message
...
What is Ham Radio?


Yawn

Not only is he very boring he isnt even original....This is a copy of
someone elses posts.

Ah well...he probably has issues and cant cope with real life and struggles
with cyberlife as he's hiding.
We dont even know if he's a radio ham.....I hope not

Cheers
Paul
MW0DCT

Tom Donaly wrote:

Spike wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:


Another day, another wretched, little troll from another
mediocre mind so filled with the desire to be recognized it has to
argue phantasms so people will notice. As has commonly been said,
it's more to be pitied than scorned.


Quite. But there's no need to repost the whole bloody thing.

from
Aero Spike

Ah, a fine example of childish, British pique. How superior of you.
I'll tell you what, m'boy. From now on, I'll send all my posts to
you before I post them so you can rewrite them to your satisfaction.
Ha, ha! I've never read a more stereotypical post.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Technically speaking, your post was at best impolite. There are plenty
of people who have killfiled the OP, and your thoughtless action
resulted in their KFs being bypassed. There are also plenty of people
on dialup, who may have already downloaded the OP's rubbish, and don't
want to pay again to download yet another copy. And, by the way, I
suggest you put further posts where the sun doesn't shine.


from
Aero Spike

In consideration of the rather immature Childish Broadcast (CB)
quoted below, any reasonable man would conjecture that
"KA6RUH" is some form of Yankland CB licence.

Ham Radio has traditions of international friendliness which
seem to be lost on you.


"Tom Donaly" wrote in message
m...

Another day, another wretched, little troll from another
mediocre mind so filled with the desire to be recognized it has to
argue phantasms so people will notice. As has commonly been said,
it's more to be pitied than scorned.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

The person with whom you are in discourse below, AKA "RVMJ",
AKA "Mrs.Nugatory" is well-renowned for having the pedantic
mind associated with a 13-year-old.

"Tom Donaly" wrote in message
m...
Spike wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:
Another day, another wretched, little troll from another
mediocre mind so filled with the desire to be recognized it has to
argue phantasms so people will notice. As has commonly been said,
it's more to be pitied than scorned.
Quite. But there's no need to repost the whole bloody thing.
from
Aero Spike
Ah, a fine example of childish, British pique. How superior of you.
I'll tell you what, m'boy. From now on, I'll send all my posts to
you before I post them so you can rewrite them to your satisfaction.
Ha, ha! I've never read a more stereotypical post.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

FFS, killfile the ****- its only because of you idiots taking his bait I can
see his posts.

Mark

With good reason - because it isn't a troll.

If your mental psyche presumes it to be, is that because
"EI9GQ" is some form of Ireland CB issue?

"Eamon Skelton" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:25:01 +0100, Polymath wrote:
What is Ham Radio?...........
Barely a twitch on the Troll-O-Meter.
Yawn!
Ed. EI9GQ.

Can't figure why an individual needs to qualify a group as diverse as
amateur radio operators in such a manner as this. Trying to describe
amateurs is like trying to determine what color of blue the sky is.
However, if only more ham were curious about how their gear worked or
liked to experiment or had the patience (most important) to design
their own gear. Sadly, many couldn't work their way through a block
diagram of their simplest gear and don't have the desire to study and
learn. I guess most hams have heard by now that the code requirements
will be eliminated from the US licensing requirements. My hope is that
there will be an influx of technically inclined/curious people who
prior to the proposed change were not interested in CW and now will
consider becoming amateurs. Homebrew is not the endall for being a
"good" ham and is not for some any more than participating in public
service should be. It is just interesting if not exciting to see what
clever circuits that some guys (many non amateur) design. I consider
myself a very average homebrewer, perhaps a "bit" behind the technology
of today as I still build some tube gear. But over the last year the
most satisfying contacts I have made have been with amateurs that had
complete scratch state of the art homebrew stations. It was interesting
pitting my 70's and 80's technology against their state of the art
though.

Don K5UOS

I am not discussing operators, I am discussing Radio Hams.

Ham Radio is a technical pursuit. It is CB Radio that is
concerned only with operating.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Can't figure why an individual needs to qualify a group as diverse as
amateur radio operators in such a manner as this.

Mark wrote:

FFS, killfile the ****- its only because of you idiots taking his bait I can
see his posts.

Mark


That's in effect what I said, but I got b*ll*cked by some foreigner..

from
Aero Spike

Spike wrote:

: Mark wrote:
:
: FFS, killfile the ****- its only because of you idiots taking his bait I can
: see his posts.
:
: Mark
:
:
: That's in effect what I said, but I got b*ll*cked by some foreigner..


en Francais oder auf Englisch ?