Polymath wrote:
No reply from Brian Reay, who thus may be taken
as a liar and a bull****ter (if he wasn't so taken
already).

All mouth and trousers.

We don't all have empty lives like you that enable us to sit and spout
**** on the internet all day.

Seeing Brian is a 'teacher', at least he has a career and not a job.

Stupid Boy!

Have you missed taking all of your lithium today perchance?

WR.

Polymath wrote:

snip


I will not ask you again, but if you do not retract and
apologise then I will seek redress from you by
means that are legal and decent, concepts that seem
to be quite alien to you.

I bet you've really got Brian running scared now Mr Gareth Evans.

Bwahahahahahaaaa!!!

Who cares what a real ham is or isn't? Why does this argument even
matter? Why can't we all just be friends and have fun?

The Eternal Squire

"Polymath" wrote in message
ups.com...
If that is your admission that it is your intention
to stir things up, then your behaviour is shameful.

Is it not enough for you that you subjected me and my family
to a two-year period of grossly offensive remarks
about sheep-shagging, and then, when you were outed
by the suggestion that such behaviour meant that you
were unsuited to being a school teacher
that you made malicious, misleading and therefore
perjurous complaints to the plods that caused a great
deal of further distress to me and my family?

Is it not enough for you that one plod is now facing a
criminal prosecution for assault and that a further 54
complaints are outstanding against other plods as the
direct result of you inciting them with your lies?

Was this shameful behaviour insufficient for you that
you must now continue with your infantile jibes, with
your stated deliberate intention as quoted below?

There remains no doubt that because of your publicly-expressed
obsession with sheep-shagging that you are a danger to children
and that under no circumstances should you be employed as a
teacher of mathematics in Strood, Kent, or, indeed, in any other place.

For the last and final time, I invite you to publicly and
unconditionally retract and apologise for your scurrilous
remarks about sheep-shagging and your other remarks about
drinking methylated spirit. I urge you to do this whilst
you still have a free choice in the matter.

I will not ask you again, but if you do not retract and
apologise then I will seek redress from you by
means that are legal and decent, concepts that seem
to be quite alien to you.

I know what you mean... you get your boss and top coucilors after you and
before you know it you loose your job ...........

Polymath wrote:
ISBN 0-7506-9946-9

"RF Circuit Deign"
By
Chris Bowick

Pub. Newnes.

I've just got a new copy from Ottakar's; it is
still in print (just) £21-99pp for 176 pages packed
full of concise info about RF circuits, LC filters
(especially the bits about use of an L-network to
match ant to TX) together with a good analysis of
the Smiff (That's _TWO_ "f"'s) Chart and how to use it.

This was recommended to me by my current employers (apparently
the book is held in high regard in Japan). I only
wish that I had come across it before.

So the person who appears to know everything about amateur radio,
electronics and life in general, didn't know about such a good book?

If your employers had to recommend it, do you have a lack of knowledge
somewhere?

Do they know the manner in which you post and contribute to this
newsgroup? Do they also know your track record with the Well-****e
Constabulary? Your stance on Lillibet Windsor and Royalty? People in
general? Partakers of the same hobby as you - 'ham'(sic!) radio - which
supposedly encourages working together and collaboration - despite you
detesting certain classes of the hobby instead of encouraging them to
further themselves? I expect, especially if your employers are Japanese,
they encourage working together and the value of fellow man?

Also, if your employers are Japanese, surely you must have some stance
on working for those you detest - murders, warmongers and out and out
torturers in the past?

Double standards Gareth deary.....tut tut....

WR.

wrote:

Who cares what a real ham is or isn't? Why does this argument even
matter? Why can't we all just be friends and have fun?

In the real world - yes.

In Gareth's head - never!

"Conrad Poos" wrote in message
. uk...
Bleedin' hell.....talk about typing in Beanies launch code!



Yep - he's gone Ballistic.

Don't worry he'll be back soon to recommend a book on Basic Rocket Science!


PS Anyone got his Keplerian Elements - if the sky is clear you might even
see him as he goes overhead.

Brian Reay wrote:

I have to agree Frank, the fundamental reason why a wire has inductance is a
very basic fact, I believe taught at KS3 science.

Let's hope that any 'colloquialisms' or 'idiomatic expressions' are
suitably flagged, as some people appear to believe that such
statements count as fundamental science and carry on into a form of
adulthood still using them but without any further thought.

Makes you wonder about degrees from the UoE, does it not?

I believe it was claimed to be 'avant-garde' at the time - possibly
the sort of environment where lecturers sent off the students to
research things for themselves, after giving a few pointers, rather
than just writing it all on the board.

Some can cope with this, and some can't.....rather in the manner of
those who must wait for the outcome of an inquiry to tell them what
officially happened, rather than working out the various scenaria for
themselves.

from
Aero Spike

"Spike" wrote in message
...

Welcome back Spike.

Brian Reay wrote:

I have to agree Frank, the fundamental reason why a wire has inductance is
a
very basic fact, I believe taught at KS3 science.

Let's hope that any 'colloquialisms' or 'idiomatic expressions' are
suitably flagged, as some people appear to believe that such
statements count as fundamental science and carry on into a form of
adulthood still using them but without any further thought.

Don't worry, kind hearted employers can always recommend a good book ;-)

Makes you wonder about degrees from the UoE, does it not?

I believe it was claimed to be 'avant-garde' at the time - possibly
the sort of environment where lecturers sent off the students to
research things for themselves,

And someone swapped the signs on the bar and the library as an initiative
test?

--
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

"Brian Reay" wrote:

: "Spike" wrote in message
: ...
:
: Welcome back Spike.
:

ahhhh isnt that nice.