Dan/W4NTI wrote:

Sorry Wendy... must of been a typo, right? WWV is on 15 Mhz.


Unless the receiver is really out of alignment! ;-)

--
?

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

Sorry Wendy... must of been a typo, right? WWV is on 15 Mhz.



Unless the receiver is really out of alignment! ;-)


well, the IF image on many 'lesser' general coverage rigs with 455 kc IF
would fall within a pointer width of 14000 so the OP may have been
correct with his statement.



-Bill

Bill ) writes:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

Sorry Wendy... must of been a typo, right? WWV is on 15 Mhz.



Unless the receiver is really out of alignment! ;-)


well, the IF image on many 'lesser' general coverage rigs with 455 kc IF
would fall within a pointer width of 14000 so the OP may have been
correct with his statement.



-Bill

And of course, the receivers that had such bad image rejection tended to
have lousy dial calibration too.

Michael VE2BVW

Michael Black wrote:

Bill ) writes:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

Sorry Wendy... must of been a typo, right? WWV is on 15 Mhz.



Unless the receiver is really out of alignment! ;-)


well, the IF image on many 'lesser' general coverage rigs with 455 kc IF
would fall within a pointer width of 14000 so the OP may have been
correct with his statement.



-Bill

And of course, the receivers that had such bad image rejection tended to
have lousy dial calibration too.

As in "WWV comes in from 14.35 to 15.60, roughly."

I had one of those.

--
(About Cobalt): They're not servers. They're Fisher-Price toys with
delusions of grandeur. One of these days, I'm expecting someone to enter
my office with a pull-along version of the Qube. playing a silly little
tune as it rolls through the door... -- Chris King, in the Monastery