"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don't worry, it's just another example of the Doobalin illiterati returning
to the fold after a far too brief absence...

--
73s de Walter R.

Walter Raleigh wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don't worry, it's just another example of the Doobalin illiterati returning
to the fold after a far too brief absence...

sorry but some where in there info stopped being tranfered? who
returning? if you would be so kind

--
73s de Walter R.

"zhpPK "

wrote in message ...
"an old friend" wrote:

you suose you could enlighten us what you get out posting a reporting
this drivel!


who is ''US'' that you talk about ?


are you some sort of SHOP STEWARD or WHAT ?

Bearing in mind the mis-spellings et al., perhaps Paul, before you resume
cyber-stalking G8OSN, you could enlighten us as to what right you have above
the previous poster, to speak on behalf of all the participants here? A weak
argument, based on a weak initial post methinks...

Just being fair...

--
73s de Walter R.

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

sorry but some where in there info stopped being tranfered? who
returning? if you would be so kind

Paul Kearney EI7GM aka Rumpelstilskin, google for more, a search by
"pkearn", a segment of his mail address used most frequently is most
effective.
Be warned, boredom may set in rather quickly....

--
73s de Walter R.

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:38:23 -0800, Polymath wrote:



A CB Radio hobbyist, on the other hand, sees no difference between a Ham
Radio licence and a CB Radio licence. To him, they are
sisters-under-the-skin.

I'm not a cb'er, never was and never will be and ham radio still looks
like cb to me! Why is that?

Wrongly, the CB Radio Hobbyist then tries to
classify himself as the equal of the Radio Ham when, in fact, he is
nothing of the kind. A sure sign of a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds, or
has ever held, a licence issued under the gangrenous degeneration that is
the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

There are many ex/current cb'ers who are G/M0 class and proud of it.

-----ooooo-----

One group of people who claim to be of the standard of Radio Hams but who
are in reality nothing more than an apology for the failure of a CBer are
those class B licensees who falsely proclaimed that they were against the
use of a Morse Test to control access to the HF bands, until, that is, a
test was introduced at their intellectual level, the intellectual level of
6-year-olds.

Rubbish. Some of us have passed electronics course/exams at BSC honours
level and yet we are not interested in the slightest with morse.

6 year-olds simply lack the mathematical tool kit to enable them to handle
even the simplest algebraic manipulation for Ohm's Law and thus,

And how good are you with tensors old chap.

the
disgraceful Class Ber's in the aforementioned category are not Radio Hams
by any stretch of the imagination!

You mistakenly ascribe too much to the ability to *jerk* a morse key old
boy.







Remember - A sure sign of a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds, or has ever
held, a licence issued under the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB
Fools' Licence scheme!

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 10:31:51 +0000, gadge wrote:

I'm not a cb'er, never was and never will be and ham radio still looks
like cb to me! Why is that?

Delighted to hear it. "Ham" radio looks like CB because of the
number of CB-ers now infesting it.

Rubbish. Some of us have passed electronics course/exams at BSC honours
level....

Nothing to do with radio, amateur or otherwise.

--

73 de Jock.

Aircraft stay in the sky in much the same way
that bricks don't.

"Walter Raleigh" wrote:

who is ''US'' that you talk about ?


are you some sort of SHOP STEWARD or WHAT ?

Bearing in mind the mis-spellings et al., perhaps Paul, before you resume
whaton earth are you on about ?

the other bloke used the term US **not me**

open your eyes please !!


______________ _____, you could enlighten us as to what right you have above
i sincerely hope for your sake that no such crime exists.

i also sincerely hope that you look in the mirror.


the previous poster, to speak on behalf of all the participants here? A weak
argument, based on a weak initial post methinks...

Just being fair...
fair ?
FAIR !

bwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

youre the one who publishes my name on here and yet REFUSES to do the same
with YOUR OWN NAME !

you also pub;lish a comment about automatics and 'jackeen ethnic
cleansing' and refuse to clarify if this is some threat !

"an_old_friend" wrote:


Walter Raleigh wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don't worry, it's just another example of the Doobalin illiterati returning
to the fold after a far too brief absence...

sorry but some where in there info stopped being tranfered? who
returning? if you would be so kind

ha ha ha..


yes wallyrally... start speaking with intelligence...
(not mention a spellchecker + decent keyboard)

zarPK wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote:


Walter Raleigh wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don't worry, it's just another example of the Doobalin illiterati returning
to the fold after a far too brief absence...

sorry but some where in there info stopped being tranfered? who
returning? if you would be so kind

ha ha ha..


yes wallyrally... start speaking with intelligence...
(not mention a spellchecker + decent keyboard)

ah yes there I have it proof enough for me the poster name not be taken
seriously

"an old friend" wrote:

ah yes there I have it proof enough for me the poster name not be taken
seriously

yes... wallyrally has been hiding in the shadows for over a year.

he/she/it refuses to identify himself when challenged to do so but
will publish the name and callsign of other(s) multiple times.

one wonders if he/she/it has some unfortunate status that is
best kept out of the way. a srarus that will explain his/her/its
attitude towards those who have the courage not to hide when
posting on this newsgroup.

he/she/it has criticised the spelling and grammar of other(s) but
conveniently ignores the historical catalogue of spelling mistakes
that he/she/it has made in the past !!