Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings.
A short while ago, I posted a request for links to simple triggered sweeps for older recurrent timebase oscilloscopes. I spent a fair amount of time looking in old magazines and circuit handbooks, but didn't find what I thought I was looking for. So I decided to cobble-up a homebrew of my own. This circuit probably has been done before, but it met my criterion of being really simple. I used already on-hand parts, so the design is far from optimum. It works fine on an Eico 460 up to about 1MHz. No attempt was made to make a calibrated sweep. You could use a 5v rail and an HC4538 to make a nice high speed triggered sweep. Have a look at: http://novatech-instr.com/Fun/trig.pdf Thank you to all of you who sent me emails and posted comments on these boards. Steve. Seattle,WA. -- Steven D. Swift, , http://www.novatech-instr.com NOVATECH INSTRUMENTS, INC. P.O. Box 55997 206.301.8986, fax 206.363.4367 Seattle, Washington 98155 USA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven Swift wrote:
Greetings. A short while ago, I posted a request for links to simple triggered sweeps for older recurrent timebase oscilloscopes. I spent a fair amount of time looking in old magazines and circuit handbooks, but didn't find what I thought I was looking for. So I decided to cobble-up a homebrew of my own. This circuit probably has been done before, but it met my criterion of being really simple. I used already on-hand parts, so the design is far from optimum. It works fine on an Eico 460 up to about 1MHz. No attempt was made to make a calibrated sweep. You could use a 5v rail and an HC4538 to make a nice high speed triggered sweep. Have a look at: http://novatech-instr.com/Fun/trig.pdf Thank you to all of you who sent me emails and posted comments on these boards. Steve. Seattle,WA. I think you could use an LM361 comparator in place of the front opamp. It produces high going and low going digital outputs that you can enable separately, so you can choose whether you want to sync on positive going or negative going edges, without changing the switching threshold. It will also clock the flip flop a lot faster than an opamp will. http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM161.pdf |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish writes:
I think you could use an LM361 comparator in place of the front opamp. It produces high going and low going digital outputs that you can enable separately, so you can choose whether you want to sync on positive going or negative going edges, without changing the switching threshold. It will also clock the flip flop a lot faster than an opamp will. http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM161.pdf Yup, good call! I actually have a 361 based circuit I built a long time ago. It works to about 50MHz. It is overkill for this purpose, but would be the right choice, along with an HC4538, if someone wanted to modify this and go to higher frequencies. You actually have to move some pins around on the 4538 to make it non-retriggerable. On the 361 board, I use long-tailed pair miller integrators to get near perfect sweeps. But that was a complete homebrew scope I designed in 1978 or so. Thanks. Steve -- Steven D. Swift, , http://www.novatech-instr.com NOVATECH INSTRUMENTS, INC. P.O. Box 55997 206.301.8986, fax 206.363.4367 Seattle, Washington 98155 USA |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven Swift wrote:
Greetings. A short while ago, I posted a request for links to simple triggered sweeps for older recurrent timebase oscilloscopes. I spent a fair amount of time looking in old magazines and circuit handbooks, but didn't find what I thought I was looking for. So I decided to cobble-up a homebrew of my own. This circuit probably has been done before, but it met my criterion of being really simple. I used already on-hand parts, so the design is far from optimum. It works fine on an Eico 460 up to about 1MHz. No attempt was made to make a calibrated sweep. You could use a 5v rail and an HC4538 to make a nice high speed triggered sweep. Have a look at: http://novatech-instr.com/Fun/trig.pdf Thank you to all of you who sent me emails and posted comments on these boards. Steve. Seattle,WA. It would seem to me relatively easy to replace the horizontal sweep oscillator with a 555 chip ! and trigger it with a sample of the vertical Amp. signal ! Yukio YANO |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Nov 2005 06:58:27 GMT, (Michael Black)
wrote: ) writes: On 22 Nov 2005 21:41:19 GMT, (Steven Swift) wrote: Pretty good. Did a similar thing using 3 555s. One was used as a threshold detector, one for the Onshot (with a FET constant current source) and one for the retrigger holdoff oneshot. Worked to well to beyond the 5mhz scope it was used with. Allison And as I pointed out in the previous thread, that wave thirty years ago of adding triggered sweep to older scopes did all use 555s for the ramp generator. I cleared off the scanner, and http://www.cam.org/~blackm00/ramp.jpg is the scan out of Howard Berlin's "The 555 Timer Applications Sourcebook with Experiments" from 1976. The actual circuit was originally in Electronics magazine for October 11, 1973, which I likely do have (at least the part with the circuit) somewhere but can't be bothered looking. And as I said, this basic circuit did seem to be the basis of all those "add triggered sweep to your oscilliscope" articles from thirty years ago. As I recall, they were all basically like this one. Michael VE2BVW It was 1972 when I first did the 555 thing. The basic circuit was greatly improved over the one shown in the URL. But the idea was the same. The 555 is an interesting chip and does real well for things like threshold detection and any form of timing or timing related functions. Allison |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted a schematic and theory of operation of an improved version of my
attempt at this. It triggers nicely to about 1MHz with the parts as shown. http://www.novatech-instr.com/Fun/trig.pdf Thanks for all the feedback. Steve. -- Steven D. Swift, , http://www.novatech-instr.com NOVATECH INSTRUMENTS, INC. P.O. Box 55997 206.301.8986, fax 206.363.4367 Seattle, Washington 98155 USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Building a 'simple' Attic Loop Antenna = Not So Simple ! | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Converting sweep tube amp to 4cx250 amp | CB | |||
XR2206 sweep generator problem | Homebrew | |||
Simple practical designing with antenna modeling programs | Antenna |