Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Kolstad wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message news ![]() Wouldn't it be easier to use a frequency counter? If one is not available, but a general coverage HF receiver or transceiver with a digital readout is available, you could zero beat the oscillator, note the reading on the display, cause the oscillator to shift to your other frequency, zero beat that signal, note the display reading and subtract to find the difference in frequency. I'm told that 'zero beating' typically has accuracy not much better than some tens of Hz due to the limited lower frequency response of the human ear... has anyone tried zero beating a signal from above and below and taking the average to get what might be a more accurate frequency estimate? If you have the right kind of AGC you can listen to the noise getting stronger/softer and go for the slowest variation -- this will get you as fine a zero beat as you have patience for. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crystal VCO | Homebrew | |||
Pulling crystal | Homebrew | |||
Crystal Set Query | Shortwave | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew |