Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Three Cheers for PC Fuller! wrote:
Amazing how many wino shops there are in that location! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4748292.stm -- huLLy Tel: 07976 123278 ICQ 136-987-925 |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Reay wrote:
"Dot" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/qz3nq Select your chosen location, take aim with the mouse and fire. ROFL... just gotta love it! I can't help thinking a size 10 boot would be more appropriate ;-) Would that be incitement to violence? |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
An apparently bored-to-death Plod's Conscience wrote:
Radio Hams are in a unique privileged position in that they can construct and operate their own equipment! No-one else has this privilege. Users, such as broadcasters, the po lice and armed farces, CBers and mobile phone users have to purchase ready-made gear. They *can* construct it, but I don't know even one that does. The technical excitement motivates Radio Hams to compete with each other to determine who has designed and manufactured the best-quality station. This competitiveness is found in DXing, competitions and fox-hunts. Same applies to many CB operators. However, beware! A Ham Radio licence is such a desirable thing to have that there are large numbers of people who wish to be thought of as Radio Hams when, in fact, they are nothing of the kind! Usually such people are a variation of the CB Radio hobbyist; they buy their radios off the shelf and send them back to be repaired Wow. You actually REPAIR the modern processor-SMD-memory-menu-submenu-miniature-components crap we have now? they are not interested in technical discussion and sneer at those who are; they have no idea how their radios work inside and have no wish to find out; 20 years ago, yes. Nowadays, all those people don't bother about placing an antenna, they just use MSN messenger. What's left on CB today are people that love radio. they are free with rather silly personal insults; You should listen to some of our Dutch 2-meter repeaters. And you should listen to yourself when you talk about CB operators. * lots of crap cut out * One infallible way to disambiguate the CB Radio Hobbyist from the _REAL_ Radio Ham is to solicit their view of the difference between CB Radio and Ham Radio. A Radio Ham will perceive Ham Radio to be a technical pursuit and will perceive CB Radio to be a social communications facility no different in essence to a land-line telephone or a GSM mobile in the hands of a 6-year-old. Your views are obscured by ignorance. I know many CB operators who are appealed more by technology than all those HAM's who, after passing their exam, never touched a soldering iron in their life anymore. * Lots of insults cut out * Fortunately, we have a different view on CB here in Holland. One channel on CB is even an official VRZA home frequency, where official HAMs and CB operators come together to talk about their hobby. The result: they attend our meetings and start to study for the 'real' HAM status. Don't repell them, attract them. Hans (PD0AC), Almere, the Netherlands |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dot" wrote in message ... On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:59:42 +0000 (UTC), "2K1LO" wrote: It's Friday afternoon.... Beanies been let out for the weekend ![]() I'm already on the case... http://tinyurl.com/qz3nq Select your chosen location, take aim with the mouse and fire. ROFL... just gotta love it! Anyone know the location of GB4FUN? it's not showing on APRS at the moment. -- 73de2K1LO -- -------------------------------------------- APRS ROCKS!! - www.g1lvn.org.uk/aprs.htm -------------------------------------------- |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That anyone is subjected to a malicious, misleading
and perjurous complaint to the plods is a reflection on the complainer and not on the victim. Brian Reay subjected me to a scurrilous, distressing and grossly offensive campaign of harassment over a two-year period when he regularly accused me of sheep-shaggingand of drinking methylated spirit. He said that my wife was a sheep next to me in the bed. It is difficult to understand the relevance of such a campaign to the pursuit that is Ham Radio, but he found it within his psyche to so behave. That he conducted that campaign when he was under training as a teacher in a girls' school in Dartford is very, very worrying now that the matter of Ian Huntley has been brought once again into our consciences. That he is a sexual pervert who is obsessed with sheep shagging is in no doubt. That he is a danger to children because of that obsession is also in no doubt. That he should not be employed in _ANY_ capacity in any school because he repeatedly published his obsession in an international news group to which children have access is also in no doubt. When "the worm turned" and I finally made a stand against his grossly offensive tirade, Brian Reay made his false complaint to the plods. That he attempted to hide the true nature of what had passed is a further reason why he is unsuitable to be employed in any capacity in any school. Brian Reay wrote: "Dot" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/qz3nq Select your chosen location, take aim with the mouse and fire. ROFL... just gotta love it! I can't help thinking a size 10 boot would be more appropriate ;-) -- 73 Brian www.g8osn.org.uk |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() JIMBO wrote: ..........or The Chuckle Brothers. (CB) Certifiably Bonkers (CB) Poos |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That anyone is subjected to a malicious, misleading
and perjurous complaint to the plods is a reflection on the complainer and not on the victim. Brian Reay subjected me to a scurrilous, distressing and grossly offensive campaign of harassment over a two-year period when he regularly accused me of sheep-shaggingand of drinking methylated spirit. He said that my wife was a sheep next to me in the bed. It is difficult to understand the relevance of such a campaign to the pursuit that is Ham Radio, but he found it within his psyche to so behave. That he conducted that campaign when he was under training as a teacher in a girls' school in Dartford is very, very worrying now that the matter of Ian Huntley has been brought once again into our consciences. That he is a sexual pervert who is obsessed with sheep shagging is in no doubt. That he is a danger to children because of that obsession is also in no doubt. That he should not be employed in _ANY_ capacity in any school because he repeatedly published his obsession in an international news group to which children have access is also in no doubt. When "the worm turned" and I finally made a stand against his grossly offensive tirade, Brian Reay made his false complaint to the plods. That he attempted to hide the true nature of what had passed is a further reason why he is unsuitable to be employed in any capacity in any school. Brian Reay wrote: "JIMBO" wrote in message ... "Plod's Conscience" wrote in message ups.com... When reading this, be on the guard against the Cry Baby (CB), the Cackling Bully (CB) and the Complete Buffoon (CB)! ..........or The Chuckle Brothers. (CB) Or, of course, the Chippenham Bootee ! -- 73 Brian www.g8osn.org.uk |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gareth Alun Evans (G4SDW) wrote: That he conducted that campaign when he was under training as a teacher in a girls' school in Dartford is very, very worrying now that the matter of Ian Huntley has been brought once again into our consciences. Ian Huntley? But surely it was YOU who wrote this, Gareth? http://groups.google.com/group/uk.ra...e?dmode=source 73 Mike G4KFK |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gareth Alun Evans (G4SDW) wrote: It is difficult to understand the relevance of such a campaign to the pursuit that is Ham Radio, but he found it within his psyche to so behave. Says the nutcase who subjected us to a barrage of ****-poor poetry and rabid retarded rhetoric when his pathetic perjurous performance failed to impress a court of law! |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike G4KFK wrote:
Gareth Alun Evans (G4SDW) wrote: That he conducted that campaign when he was under training as a teacher in a girls' school in Dartford is very, very worrying now that the matter of Ian Huntley has been brought once again into our consciences. Ian Huntley? But surely it was YOU who wrote this, Gareth? http://groups.google.com/group/uk.ra...e?dmode=source 73 Mike G4KFK He forgets most things, don't you, Gareth baby... -- huLLy Tel: 07976 123278 ICQ 136-987-925 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |