Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a link to a website for making a high power Z match? I
have made the 100 watt version with the toroid core and broadcast caps which really works great. I thought maybe there might be a design out there using heavier toroids for more wattage (500-1000 watts). Thanks for any info, Rob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob wrote:
Does anyone have a link to a website for making a high power Z match? I have made the 100 watt version with the toroid core and broadcast caps which really works great. I thought maybe there might be a design out there using heavier toroids for more wattage (500-1000 watts). Thanks for any info, Rob http://www4.tpgi.com.au/users/ldbutl...CoilZMatch.htm larry kd5foy |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rob wrote: Does anyone have a link to a website for making a high power Z match? I have made the 100 watt version with the toroid core and broadcast caps which really works great. I thought maybe there might be a design out there using heavier toroids for more wattage (500-1000 watts). Thanks for any info, Rob Assuming a constant Q or quality factor, the power handling of a toroid is proportional to its surface area. Thus, to handle 10x more power, you need 10x more surface area. A double thickness T400 toroid, 4 inches thick and 1.3 inches in diameter, should handle 600 watts, assuming the T157 worked well at 100 watts. A stack of two T520 toroids should handle a kilowatt. In practice, the optimum Q moves lower in frequency as the toroids get larger, which isn't necessarily a problem, since hams tend to need more power on the lower HF bands. Zack Lau W1VT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
Clemens match modelling | Antenna | |||
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |