Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any idaes on how to lower the nf in a uhf preamp?
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
" wrote: Does anyone have any idaes on how to lower the nf in a uhf preamp? 1. Lower then temprature of the device, by dumping it in Liquid Nitrogen. 2. Use a device with a lower Noise Figure, as the active element. Daaa..... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
3a. Tune (match) the input for lowest in-system noise figure.
This is in general not a match for maximum power transfer. 3b. Be sure the active device(s) is/are biased for optimum noise figu collector/drain voltage and standing current. 4. Be sure there are not any unnecessary noise contributions from components other than the active devices in the amplifier. If you want to consider the system as a whole, 4. Lower the loss between the antenna and the preamp (eliminate feedline, for example). 5. Be sure that the preamp has enough gain that it sensibly sets the system noise figure. (Be sure that its gain gets the signal seen at the next stage high enough that the next stage contributes insignificant noise to the system.) .... etc. But beware of trading other things for noise figu beware of poor intermod or desense performance, for example. Cheers, "Me" aka Tom "You" wrote: In article .com, " wrote: Does anyone have any idaes on how to lower the nf in a uhf preamp? 1. Lower then temprature of the device, by dumping it in Liquid Nitrogen. 2. Use a device with a lower Noise Figure, as the active element. Daaa..... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a point of reference, a typical NE3508M04
(http://www.cel.com/pdf/datasheets/ne3508m04.pdf) can give you a device noise figure under 0.4dB, operated at room temperature, at any frequency across the entire "UHF" frequency range (300MHz to 3GHz)--better than that at the lower end of the frequency range. Cheers, Tom |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the website, my problem was i had a factory cellular preamp
from surplus equipment, it had a ceramic filter on the input set 824-850 mhz. When i removed the filter the noise figure was terrible but the bandwith very wide, im trying to get it to operate in the 33cm band with decent noise figure. The only thing i can figure is that by removing the banpass filter i raised the NF? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"K7ITM" wrote: As a point of reference, a typical NE3508M04 (http://www.cel.com/pdf/datasheets/ne3508m04.pdf) can give you a device noise figure under 0.4dB, operated at room temperature, at any frequency across the entire "UHF" frequency range (300MHz to 3GHz)--better than that at the lower end of the frequency range. Cheers, Tom Nothing like a Ruby Maser dumped in Liquid Nitrogen and pumped at -12 DBm to bring in those extremely small signals........ all it takes is cold...... |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Im guessing at the noise figure, im running a low level 1mv fr0m a
cushman service monitor to the preamp input. Im using a uniden 898t scanner as a receiver because it has a digital S meter. When i turn on the preamp jumps up 3-4 bars but the modulation tone stays the same volume level. By this im guessing the noise level has increased, the preamp had a ceramic filter with the 50ohm input going directly into it and its output thur cap to the 1st amp, the seller on ebay said just remove the filter and move the input to the filters output trace, thats what i done but results are poor even thou this is a commercial preamp pulled from analog cell site. It looks to be a very well made preamp so it should work if i figure out the input match? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The device in the preamp may not have the greatest noise figure to
start with. Most preamps used in those type installations are usually more concerned with signal handling ability, so as not to produce intermod, rather than the last ounce of signal to noise performance. It is difficult to have a device that will give you maximum signal to noise performance along with excellent intermod performance. Often a preamp is used ahead of power dividers to feed several receivers and it is there to make up for the losses in the power dividers and not necessarily there for the sole purpose of improving signal to noise performance. When comparing how it is performing you need to actually measure sinadd or quieting of the receiver to tell if it is giving you any improvement. Just looking at stronger noise levels on the receiver and guessing how much the signal is above the noise can be very misleading. 73 Gary K4FMX On 13 Apr 2006 14:49:28 -0700, " wrote: Im guessing at the noise figure, im running a low level 1mv fr0m a cushman service monitor to the preamp input. Im using a uniden 898t scanner as a receiver because it has a digital S meter. When i turn on the preamp jumps up 3-4 bars but the modulation tone stays the same volume level. By this im guessing the noise level has increased, the preamp had a ceramic filter with the 50ohm input going directly into it and its output thur cap to the 1st amp, the seller on ebay said just remove the filter and move the input to the filters output trace, thats what i done but results are poor even thou this is a commercial preamp pulled from analog cell site. It looks to be a very well made preamp so it should work if i figure out the input match? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If your modulation is FM, the receiver audio is going to remain the
same. And yes, the S meter will jump due to excess noise output of the preamplifier. The Excess gain will reduce the dynamic range of your receiver system and cause intermodulation (IM). 1. Connect a SINAD meter to your receiver . 2. Connect the Cushman directly to the receiver, adjust for +/- 3.0 KHz deviation with 1000 Hz tone. 3. Adjust Cushman generator for 12 dB SINAD 4. Note the generator output in dBm 5. Install preamplifier between Cushman and receiver 6. Adjust generator again for 12 dB SINAD 7. Note the generator output in dBm (should be more negative value than step 4) 8. The difference in dBm from steps 4 and 7 relate to the improvment (if any) in noise figure between the receiver alone and the receiver with the preamplifier. 9. Install a variable attenuator between output of preamplifier and input of receiver. Set to 0 dB attenuation. 10. Adjust generator for 12 dB SINAD 11. Adjust variable attenuator from step 9 until the 12 dB SINAD degrades slighly (numerically 12 dB). 12. Readjust attenuator 1 dB per step until 12 dB SINAD is restored. 13. You have optimized your receiver and preamplifier for best intermodulation (IM) performance. 14. Install preamplifier close to antenna with a feedline, replace variable attenuator with fixed value equal to the value from step 12 minu the measured loss of the feedline between preamplifier and receiver. 15. If Cushman doesn't display dBM, use microvolts, fewer microvolts for 12 dB SINAD is the goal! 16. The above assumed an unmodified, properly operating preamplifier. Your preamplifier must have some sort of preselector filter between the antenna and it's input. Removing the stock filter exposes the preamplifier to overload from out of band signals, may affect the impedance (stability) of the preamplifier. Try operating it in its stock configuration and frequency prior to modifieing it. Then replace the stock filter with a properly tuned filter for the frequency you desire. Yes, you might have to retune the preamp if the frequency change is too far. Use the SINAD method and a low level signal to tweak the preamplifier sensitivity. Make sure your generator and cables are 50 ohms. A 10 dB 50 ohm pad between generator output and the system, may improve your results if the generator does not provide a 50 ohm source. wrote: Im guessing at the noise figure, im running a low level 1mv fr0m a cushman service monitor to the preamp input. Im using a uniden 898t scanner as a receiver because it has a digital S meter. When i turn on the preamp jumps up 3-4 bars but the modulation tone stays the same volume level. By this im guessing the noise level has increased, the preamp had a ceramic filter with the 50ohm input going directly into it and its output thur cap to the 1st amp, the seller on ebay said just remove the filter and move the input to the filters output trace, thats what i done but results are poor even thou this is a commercial preamp pulled from analog cell site. It looks to be a very well made preamp so it should work if i figure out the input match? -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "The RFI-EMI-GUY"© "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." "Follow The Money" ;-P |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PreAmp Noise Figure of the GRE preamps. | Scanner | |||
Noise Figure Measurements | Homebrew | |||
Icom 746pro Testimonial | Shortwave | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |