Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone have a favorite low power (as in tens of milliwatts) receiver IC that
you can still get ahold of? I'm looking to see what could potentially replace some Philips UAA2080's, which are no longer available new from Philips. They were a really great part, giving you an oscillator, frequency mulitplier, RF pre-amp, I/Q mixers and a bit of demodulation (they were intended for use in pagers but gave you the raw I/Q output so could be pushed into service for other applications too) -- all of this for less than 10mW! Looking around at parts, it seems that even plain old mixers now often run 50mW or more. Ostensibly this seems due to their usage at higher frequencies (low GHz range), which I can understand, but it's a feature don't require. I'm after low power parts for dealing with more pedestrian frequencies (low to mid-hundreds of MHz) and small bandwidths (single digit kHz). Thanks, ---Joel KOlstad |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Kolstad wrote:
Anyone have a favorite low power (as in tens of milliwatts) receiver IC that you can still get ahold of? I'm looking to see what could potentially replace some Philips UAA2080's, which are no longer available new from Philips. They were a really great part, giving you an oscillator, frequency mulitplier, RF pre-amp, I/Q mixers and a bit of demodulation (they were intended for use in pagers but gave you the raw I/Q output so could be pushed into service for other applications too) -- all of this for less than 10mW! Looking around at parts, it seems that even plain old mixers now often run 50mW or more. Ostensibly this seems due to their usage at higher frequencies (low GHz range), which I can understand, but it's a feature don't require. I'm after low power parts for dealing with more pedestrian frequencies (low to mid-hundreds of MHz) and small bandwidths (single digit kHz). Thanks, ---Joel KOlstad Hey, if you find one let me know! Have you considered looking at one of the obsolete-components suppliers? It sounds stupid, but it seems like a lot of good RF parts for VHF are going by the wayside as everyone gets on the GHz bandwagon. Maybe we could hire Jim Thompson and start a company... -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Kolstad wrote:
Anyone have a favorite low power (as in tens of milliwatts) receiver IC that you can still get ahold of? I'm looking to see what could potentially replace some Philips UAA2080's, which are no longer available new from Philips. They were a really great part, giving you an oscillator, frequency mulitplier, RF pre-amp, I/Q mixers and a bit of demodulation (they were intended for use in pagers but gave you the raw I/Q output so could be pushed into service for other applications too) -- all of this for less than 10mW! Looking around at parts, it seems that even plain old mixers now often run 50mW or more. Ostensibly this seems due to their usage at higher frequencies (low GHz range), which I can understand, but it's a feature don't require. I'm after low power parts for dealing with more pedestrian frequencies (low to mid-hundreds of MHz) and small bandwidths (single digit kHz). Thanks, ---Joel KOlstad Most manufacturers seem to be obsessed with "high intercept point", which is desirable in some instances, but always carries a major power penalty. With the demise of some of my favourite ICs, I'm going back to discrete components for many things. Bob -- Everything gets easier with practice, except getting up in the morning! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tim,
"Tim Wescott" wrote in message ... Hey, if you find one let me know! Yeah, will do! Have you considered looking at one of the obsolete-components suppliers? Not yet, I'll check there shortly. Maybe we could hire Jim Thompson and start a company... I could use about 1000 of them right about now... perhaps even a couple thousand. But I suspect the quantity would have to be in at least the tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands before anyone would be willing to build something new... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Kolstad wrote:
Hi Tim, "Tim Wescott" wrote in message ... Hey, if you find one let me know! Yeah, will do! Have you considered looking at one of the obsolete-components suppliers? Not yet, I'll check there shortly. Maybe we could hire Jim Thompson and start a company... I could use about 1000 of them right about now... perhaps even a couple thousand. But I suspect the quantity would have to be in at least the tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands before anyone would be willing to build something new... Check with Lansdale to see if they can help. They buy the rights to manufacture a lot of EOL parts. http://www.lansdale.com/ -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
NTIA Claims BPL Could Help Alleviate Power Line Noise | Shortwave | |||
FA: New Power Connector for BC-348 Receiver | Boatanchors |