Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any schematic for Direct Conversion receiver that does not
use any FETs, Valves or ICs (e.g. NE602) but uses NPN transistors? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a direct conversion transceiver that might give you some ideas
http://www.intio.or.jp/jf10zl/3trcw.htm I don't think you will find that this is a particularly good receiver, but it is the only IC-free DC receiver I know of on the web (and its VERY clever!). Or, if you have a circuit that uses a CA3028 mixer, you can easily make up the equivalent from 3 NPN transistors and some resistors. 73, Steve VE3SMA |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Does anyone have any schematic for Direct Conversion receiver that does not use any FETs, Valves or ICs (e.g. NE602) but uses NPN transistors? "Experimental Methods in RF design", section 1.8, page 1.13, has the schematic for a DC receiver which uses NPN transistors throughout most of its design (including the product detector). Tuning is done via a varactor-based VCO - you might be able to substitute a reverse-biased junction in an NPN transistor for the varactor. There are two ICs - an LM7805 voltage regulator (for which you could probably substitute a shunt regulator such as a zener diode or an NPN transistor wired up as a Vbe-multiplier) and an LM386 audio amplifier (for which you could substitute the discrete-NPN audio amp design on the previous page of the book). I'd say there's a good chance you could modify this design so that every single semiconductor in it was an NPN transistor such as a 2N3904 or 2N2222 or a similar jellybean. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Platt wrote:
Does anyone have any schematic for Direct Conversion receiver that does not use any FETs, Valves or ICs (e.g. NE602) but uses NPN transistors? "Experimental Methods in RF design", section 1.8, page 1.13, has the schematic for a DC receiver which uses NPN transistors throughout most of its design (including the product detector). Tuning is done via a varactor-based VCO - you might be able to substitute a reverse-biased junction in an NPN transistor for the varactor. There are two ICs - an LM7805 voltage regulator (for which you could probably substitute a shunt regulator such as a zener diode or an NPN transistor wired up as a Vbe-multiplier) and an LM386 audio amplifier (for which you could substitute the discrete-NPN audio amp design on the previous page of the book). I'd say there's a good chance you could modify this design so that every single semiconductor in it was an NPN transistor such as a 2N3904 or 2N2222 or a similar jellybean. -- or for the shunt regulator you could use a back-biased base-emitter junction in a 2N2222. It trashes the transistor, but it makes an adequate zener. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You might want to check out VE7BPO's site for DC receiver ideas. He
has lots of experimental circuits using NPNs and he will respond to emails if you have any questions. http://www.qrp.pops.net/ Good luck - Roger Nev wrote: Does anyone have any schematic for Direct Conversion receiver that does not use any FETs, Valves or ICs (e.g. NE602) but uses NPN transistors? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() There was an article in QST many years ago ( late 1960's ??) which was one of the early direct conversion articles. This one used 88 mH filters, and a three transistor audio amplifier. It was written by Doug Demaw, if memory serves, and it is probably the simplest, but useful, direct conversion design I have ever seen. Granted, getting 88 mH coils is not as easy as it was back then, but all in all, I think this fits the original request. The radio used NPN transistors thoughout. Jim N6BIU |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
"Jim" ) writes: There was an article in QST many years ago ( late 1960's ??) which was one of the early direct conversion articles. This one used 88 mH filters, and a three transistor audio amplifier. It was written by Doug Demaw, if memory serves, and it is probably the simplest, but useful, direct conversion design I have ever seen. But one thing about direct conversion receivers is that it took years before they became good. The basic premise, beating a signal directly down to audio, is as old as the regenerative receiver. ANd of course there were explicit mixer/oscillator type receivers in the decades after that, that all seemed to end in "dyne". IN 1961, QST ran an article, I can't remember if it mentioned "direct conversion", that was direct conversion as we came to know it. A mixer and an oscillator, and if I'm remembering they used two tubes in the mixer for a balanced mixer. Then there's the Hayward article, there was a co-author, in 1968, that actually did make mention of "direct conversion". It used schottkey diodes in a balanced mixer. And that's when they took off. But in the articles afterwards used just about any possible mixer, with varying results. Everyone was trying to get a good direct conversion receiver, but I'm not sure they really understood them. So the focus was on another variation of a well-balanced mixer. It took till 1980, before there was a real change. That's when Roy Lewallen came out with his "optimized QRP transceiver", which featured a terminated mixer. I'm pretty certain that's the first time a DC receiver had a terminated mixer. I can remember the 1974 QST article when terminated mixers for VHF converters were introduced to the amateur world. I really do say that 1980 article of Roy's was the dividing line. Before that, no matter how good the mixer there always seemed to be problems. Then we moved into an area where simplicity wasn't the first consideration for direct conversion, but performance came first. Michael VE2BVW Granted, getting 88 mH coils is not as easy as it was back then, but all in all, I think this fits the original request. The radio used NPN transistors thoughout. Jim N6BIU The direct conversion transceiver is what gave TenTec their start. They had a few different models in kit, semi-kit, and assembled formats. QST picked up the craze and there were a number of articles on building these. Detectors were dual gate fets, CA2028's, diode bridges, Mini-Circuit mixer modules, and later IC's with built in vfo's. Back in the 60's, there was an early direct conversion receiver that used two 6SB7Y's in a balanced circuit with a B&W phase splitter run bass-ackwards and an rf phase splitter in the vfo. This was actually a single signal receiver using the idea of a phasing sideband modulator in reverse. Today we'd call it an image-reject mixer. What's old is new again..... |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Sharf Wrote:
Back in the 60's, there was an early direct conversion receiver that used two 6SB7Y's in a balanced circuit with a B&W phase splitter run bass-ackwards and an rf phase splitter in the vfo. This was actually a single signal receiver using the idea of a phasing sideband modulator in reverse. Today we'd call it an image-reject mixer. What's old is new again..... I remember that one !! Seems to me, it was in Single Sideband for the Radio Amateur and I was really tempted to try to build one. Actually, I was responding to the original request for a direct conversion using NPN transistors. There are a lot of designs for direct conversion rigs, and some of them are excellent. Personally, I like the designs by KK7B and if someone wants to try their hand at it, the Kanga website has some kits available. http://www.bright.net/~kanga/kanga/KK7B/minir2.htm They also carry the R2PRO which has excellent characteristics http://www.bright.net/~kanga/kanga/KK7B/r2pro.htm I've homebrewed from scratch some direct conversion breadboards over the years, but these are image reject and would be a good starting point for a complete transceiver. Jim N6BIU |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try this link:
http://www.phonestack.com/farhan/xcvr1.html "Nev" wrote in message ... Does anyone have any schematic for Direct Conversion receiver that does not use any FETs, Valves or ICs (e.g. NE602) but uses NPN transistors? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did u see this one?
http://www.qrp4u.de/index_en.html -- ========================================= Radio Amateurs - Fill your junk box, from my junkbox! http://www.hamradparts.com 73 de KB9BVN ========================================= "Nev" wrote in message ... Does anyone have any schematic for Direct Conversion receiver that does not use any FETs, Valves or ICs (e.g. NE602) but uses NPN transistors? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A "single conversion" question | Shortwave | |||
FS: HBR-15 Receiver, Hallicrafters, Heathkit, Millen and Other Goodies | Boatanchors | |||
Direct conversion receivers for AM | Homebrew | |||
Direct conversion receivers for AM | Homebrew | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment |