Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
Are you using them in a series resonant circuit or parallel ? Have you tried an inductor in series with the crystal (say 500nH to 800nH) ? Regards David John Wilkinson wrote: Hi, I need a good second LO at 44.545MHz. I have a few crystals that I bought, that are say they are 44.545MHz, but are really 44.548MHz. I tried pulling the frquency somewhat, but to no great avail. I have read that overtone crystals are hard to pull. Does anyone know where I can get good quality crystals at this frequency? Or how I may combine some easily available crystal frequencies to get either 44.545MHz or 45.455MHz? Best regards, John. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:23:33 +0100, John Wilkinson
wrote: I have a few crystals that I bought, that are say they are 44.545MHz, but are really 44.548MHz. I tried pulling the frquency somewhat, but to no great avail. Overtone crystals do not oscillate at the _accurate_ integer multiple of the fundamental frequency due to end effects. Have you tried to run the crystal in the fundamental mode ? If the produced frequency is close enough to 14.84833.. MHz, just put a separate tripler after the oscillator. I have read that overtone crystals are hard to pull. The pulling range is proportional to 1/NČ and since the needed pulling range would be 67 ppm and assuming 3rd overtone crystals, the comparable pulling range for fundamental mode crystals would be 600 ppm, which indeed is quite a lot. Paul OH3LWR |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
Most overtone crystals are designed for operation on their series resonance. There is also a parallel resonance, usually a few khz higher than the series resonance. The fact that your oscillator is putting out a signal a few khz higher than the frequency marked on the crystal is a good indicator that you might be operating the crystal in the parallel mode. You shouldn't have to resort to any 'tricks' like operating it in its fundamental mode & multiplying, or putting frequency 'pulling' components in the circuit. It should come very close to the marked frequency if you use the correct circuit. Can you refer to a circuit that's similar to yours so we can look at it and recommend what might be wrong? Joe W3JDR "John Wilkinson" wrote in message .. . Hi, I need a good second LO at 44.545MHz. I have a few crystals that I bought, that are say they are 44.545MHz, but are really 44.548MHz. I tried pulling the frquency somewhat, but to no great avail. I have read that overtone crystals are hard to pull. Does anyone know where I can get good quality crystals at this frequency? Or how I may combine some easily available crystal frequencies to get either 44.545MHz or 45.455MHz? Best regards, John. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Wilkinson wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:47:31 GMT, W3JDR wrote: John, Most overtone crystals are designed for operation on their series resonance. There is also a parallel resonance, usually a few khz higher than the series resonance. The fact that your oscillator is putting out a signal a few khz higher than the frequency marked on the crystal is a good indicator that you might be operating the crystal in the parallel mode. You shouldn't have to resort to any 'tricks' like operating it in its fundamental mode & multiplying, or putting frequency 'pulling' components in the circuit. It should come very close to the marked frequency if you use the correct circuit. Can you refer to a circuit that's similar to yours so we can look at it and recommend what might be wrong? Joe W3JDR "John Wilkinson" wrote in message ... Hi, I need a good second LO at 44.545MHz. I have a few crystals that I bought, that are say they are 44.545MHz, but are really 44.548MHz. I tried pulling the frquency somewhat, but to no great avail. I have read that overtone crystals are hard to pull. Does anyone know where I can get good quality crystals at this frequency? Or how I may combine some easily available crystal frequencies to get either 44.545MHz or 45.455MHz? Best regards, John. Hi, Thanks, The circuit I am using is a simple JFET J310 with a tuned drain circuit. The XTAL is connected from the gate to the drain via a 10nF cap. Another was a colpits oscillator, with a 2N3904 transistor. The XTAL was used in palce of the usual L and C. Regards, John. The Pierce circuit is, I believe, only useful for crystals, and not too useful at that. The Colpitts will definitely want to see you using the thing in parallel mode -- basically you're replacing an inductor with the crystal. Check out the UHF experimenter's manual from the ARRL. The circuit that they recommend has as it's core a basic grounded-base Colpitts, with the wire from the feedback capacitors to the transistor emitter replaced by the crystal: .-----------o-----. | | | | | | |/ C1 --- | .-----| --- | | | _ | | | | | | | C| | '----|| ||--o C| L1 | |_| | C| | Y1 | | === --- | GND C2 --- | | | | | === === GND GND (created by AACircuit v1.28.6 beta 04/19/05 www.tech-chat.de) I don't remember the biasing (obviously this ain't going to work as is) or where you take off your signal, but the idea is that L1, C1 and C2 form a regular old Colpitts at Y1's 3rd-overtone frequency. Y1 just makes sure that the dang thing doesn't drift. What little work I've done with the thing shows it to be very reliable about staying on frequency and starting and all that cool stuff. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I need a good second LO at 44.545MHz. I have a few crystals that I bought, that are say they are 44.545MHz, but are really 44.548MHz. I tried pulling the frquency somewhat, but to no great avail. I have read that overtone crystals are hard to pull. Does anyone know where I can get good quality crystals at this frequency? Or how I may combine some easily available crystal frequencies to get either 44.545MHz or 45.455MHz? Best regards, John. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:47:31 GMT, W3JDR wrote:
John, Most overtone crystals are designed for operation on their series resonance. There is also a parallel resonance, usually a few khz higher than the series resonance. The fact that your oscillator is putting out a signal a few khz higher than the frequency marked on the crystal is a good indicator that you might be operating the crystal in the parallel mode. You shouldn't have to resort to any 'tricks' like operating it in its fundamental mode & multiplying, or putting frequency 'pulling' components in the circuit. It should come very close to the marked frequency if you use the correct circuit. Can you refer to a circuit that's similar to yours so we can look at it and recommend what might be wrong? Joe W3JDR "John Wilkinson" wrote in message .. . Hi, I need a good second LO at 44.545MHz. I have a few crystals that I bought, that are say they are 44.545MHz, but are really 44.548MHz. I tried pulling the frquency somewhat, but to no great avail. I have read that overtone crystals are hard to pull. Does anyone know where I can get good quality crystals at this frequency? Or how I may combine some easily available crystal frequencies to get either 44.545MHz or 45.455MHz? Best regards, John. Hi, Thanks, The circuit I am using is a simple JFET J310 with a tuned drain circuit. The XTAL is connected from the gate to the drain via a 10nF cap. Another was a colpits oscillator, with a 2N3904 transistor. The XTAL was used in palce of the usual L and C. Regards, John. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:23:33 +0100, John Wilkinson wrote:
Hi, I need a good second LO at 44.545MHz. I have a few crystals that I bought, that are say they are 44.545MHz, but are really 44.548MHz. I tried pulling the frquency somewhat, but to no great avail. I have read that overtone crystals are hard to pull. Does anyone know where I can get good quality crystals at this frequency? Or how I may combine some easily available crystal frequencies to get either 44.545MHz or 45.455MHz? Best regards, John. Hi, I would like to thank Joe, W3JDR and Tim Wescott for thier help. I made a common base colpits oscillator, as per the ARRL handbook, with a 2N3904, and got it working at 45.455MHz...Great. That's a lesson learnt. Best regards, John |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|