an old friend wrote:

" Mark blatantly lies again, nope you just like to say that"

No...You just make it easy to do.

Not Lloyd wrote:
Harken back a few months, Mark. It was Roger who made the post threatening
to send your posts to your father-in-law. You even asked him why he'd want
to do that to an elderly man.

Robeson did so as well...(SNIP)

Nope...Get it right, Morkie.

I said WHAT WOULD YOUR "IN-LAWS" think of you.

It was a question.

YOU accuse everyone else of "paranoia", yet you're steeped deep in
it!

then Wismen picked it up as he was intended by Robeson

Nope.

YOU provided your in-laws name and general geographical area,
Morkie, and have been trying to blame everyone else EXCEPT yourself for
the invasion of THIER privacy.

I also don't recall refering to Mr Hojnacki as elderly but perhaps you
are right

Well...Lessee...You're 40-something, so I assume your "wife" is in
the same age bracket plus/minus 5 years. That would put your alleged
father-in-law in his 60's...

There were no "confederates", merely Wiseman getting under your thin skin.
Again, as you often do, you have either forgotten the facts or, more likely,
are lying to suit your own purposes.

no you and Robeson are hopping that time has concealed YOUR distortions
of the fact

No...YOU are trying desperately to cover up the fact that YOUR fat
fingers disclsoed your alleged in-laws location.

In short, Mark, you are a liar. A bold-faced, underhanded liar. How about
telling the truth once in a while? Not that you can....

Wisemen and Robeson have been working together for months almost a year
now

Nope.

We just share the same opinion of your assinine, failed efforts to
cover up your own culpability in disclosing your alleged in-laws
domicile.

Robeson make the intail lie and Wismen the manaic pick it up and
Wismen is being used by Robeson wether Wismen knows or not

No...MORGAN made the initial mistake of declaring where his
alleged spouse hailed from and that there was still family residing
there.

Of Course since Wismen seems to enjoy trashing Newsgruops he likely
does not mind

He doesn't seem to enjoy it any more than YOU do, Morkie.

the fact remains Robeson can verify the Claim my wife is female ANYTIME
he wants

he KNOWS it and refuses

Knows WHAT...?!?!

That I can call a screened, call-forwarded number to your
sockpuppet?

I'm not that gullible, fatboy!

He and his confederates publish my father in law's person info weeks
ago...(SNIP)

No...YOU provided the information, fatboy.

Google archives refer.

(UNSNIP)...so no further intrution realy occours by my republishing it...(SNIP)

So since YOU have now comprimised your alleged extended family's
privacy it's OK for YOU to CONTINUE to abuse it...?!?!

If you were in MY extended family, you'd never see the inside of
MY home.

and yet that refference gives Robeson the ability to verify my story after all
he truned up the addres his confederate turned up the number to go with
so why should thye not trust it.

Caller ID.

Call Forwarding.

Sock Puppet.

No deal.

Steve, K4YZ