K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

" Mark blatantly lies again, nope you just like to say that"

No...You just make it easy to do.
no you just like to say I lie

but you are the one that lies you blatant lies about Moonbounce being
impossible from here

Not Lloyd wrote:
Harken back a few months, Mark. It was Roger who made the post threatening
to send your posts to your father-in-law. You even asked him why he'd want
to do that to an elderly man.

Robeson did so as well...(SNIP)

Nope...Get it right, Morkie.
..
I did you are trying to alter the past

I said WHAT WOULD YOUR "IN-LAWS" think of you.
you posted this fter you posted the names and addresses of various
memeber of the Hojnacki Clan aas well those of people unreleated to
these hojnackis as far as we knew you did shortly after I anounced my
wifes license as I recall


It was a question.

what it was was failed blackmail

YOU accuse everyone else of "paranoia", yet you're steeped deep in
it!
no YOU lie and don't even keep them straight


then Wismen picked it up as he was intended by Robeson

Nope.
ye sexactly you itnded it to be picked nd used by wisemen or someone
else, anyone as long as it was going to be used to attack me

YOU provided your in-laws name and general geographical area,
Morkie, and have been trying to blame everyone else EXCEPT yourself for
the invasion of THIER privacy.

you posted the addresses of several of them I pointed outthe corret for
reason of my own

I was concerned you might call My wife uncle whoose address you also
listed and frankly I would not him getting into trouble should he react
....Badly to such a lie being told about hs niece

I also don't recall refering to Mr Hojnacki as elderly but perhaps you
are right

Well...Lessee...You're 40-something, so I assume your "wife" is in
the same age bracket plus/minus 5 years. That would put your alleged
father-in-law in his 60's...

but you are wrong about my wife's age
Ed is about 66 but I don't esp consdier that elderly in most cases

There were no "confederates", merely Wiseman getting under your thin skin.
Again, as you often do, you have either forgotten the facts or, more likely,
are lying to suit your own purposes.

no you and Robeson are hopping that time has concealed YOUR distortions
of the fact

No...YOU are trying desperately to cover up the fact that YOUR fat
fingers disclsoed your alleged in-laws location.
no I am stating facts you and you ally did so by slowing teasing data
out of me with lies implied threat and interent searches that you and
your ally published

I simply choose to take advantage of the state of affairs

My fatherinlaw also wishes his donly daughter not be called Male when
he knows full well she is female

does not alter the fact you can verify my wife gender anytime you can
Ed at home

In short, Mark, you are a liar. A bold-faced, underhanded liar. How about
telling the truth once in a while? Not that you can....

Wisemen and Robeson have been working together for months almost a year
now

Nope.
sure you have that another lie you just told

We just share the same opinion of your assinine, failed efforts to
cover up your own culpability in disclosing your alleged in-laws
domicile.
and I never saw wismen even accuse me doing anything wrong in
revaeling thing about my fatherinlaw you are now lying about the
opinion of your confederate (unless you are making stuff up again)

and you are both enaged in the same CRIMINAL end that makes you
conspirators under the law


Robeson make the intail lie and Wismen the manaic pick it up and
Wismen is being used by Robeson wether Wismen knows or not

No...MORGAN made the initial mistake of declaring where his
alleged spouse hailed from and that there was still family residing
there.

why should I not?

you ut out the addess I was concerned you might follow them up in ways
I did not want YOURs was the agressive action I was just trying to make
the best of it


Of Course since Wismen seems to enjoy trashing Newsgruops he likely
does not mind

He doesn't seem to enjoy it any more than YOU do, Morkie.

BULL**** he loves and I don't trash the ngs you and he do


the fact remains Robeson can verify the Claim my wife is female ANYTIME
he wants

he KNOWS it and refuses

Knows WHAT...?!?!
use english you know you can verfiy it ithat was the subject of the
sentce abve that

USE your aleged knowledge of ENGLISH


That I can call a screened, call-forwarded number to your
sockpuppet?
more libel

the plan is for you to call and he snags YOUR number of his call
waiting
but in the barrgain he answer a few questions about my wife and get the
pleasure of telling YOU what he thinks of you

I'm not that gullible, fatboy!
no you just refuse to face the facts


He and his confederates publish my father in law's person info weeks
ago...(SNIP)

No...YOU provided the information, fatboy.
I merely confirmed one of the addresses YOU posted


Google archives refer.

(UNSNIP)...so no further intrution realy occours by my republishing it...(SNIP)

So since YOU have now comprimised your alleged extended family's
privacy it's OK for YOU to CONTINUE to abuse it...?!?!
you compromised it firt and besides THEY are MY relitives not yours


If you were in MY extended family, you'd never see the inside of
MY home.
if I found you were in my extended family I would comitt suicide at
once

but you lack the right to speak for the Hojnackis

and yet that refference gives Robeson the ability to verify my story after all
he truned up the addres his confederate turned up the number to go with
so why should thye not trust it.

Caller ID.
well you saw that one finaly

Call Forwarding.
why bother

Sock Puppet.
your ally and yourself did the research

No deal.
coward you are


Steve, K4YZ