LenCan'tPassAn wrote:
From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb,
rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap

wrote:
From: an old fiend to small children on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap

[Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud]

[fake quote omitted for decency]

But I still see your post, Lennie.

Guess you're not as decent as you claim.

(As if THAT was news...)

Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly
BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting:

1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange
ever existed through any referencable third-party source,
nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an
inquiry.

Correct.

Hello Brian...long time no write...

Hard to write when you have nothing meaningful to say.

We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this
time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take
his word on it (that it is true).

Nope.

You've been given more than adequate references to follow-up on.

You've certainly spammed us with enough stories about ADA.

And not a single "new" thing since 1963 or 4...

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !!

[...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...]


2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified
by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals
in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the
United States military have a position title which is used
for all correspondence.

Correct.

Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed
order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY
message where everything is in caps. He may think that is
still in use, poor guy.

Who's "Major Dud"...?

And nice try on the diversion, Lennie.

Weak, but hey, you're old and...well...feeble.

HUGE SNIP OF USUSAL ANTI-STEVE BUFFONERY

MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with
morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back
up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key
ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists"
or other wild imaginings.

Well, we see that Lennie's now ANTI-MARS.

I see you haven't been keeping up with current events vis-a-vis
MARS and it's expaning roles, Lennie.

But why should you?

On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major
Army communications station

OH YES!

More "...there I was back in 1953 at ADA, watching the finals glow
in the dark...."

http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf
and /AlphabetSoup.pdf

I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number
of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for
Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office.

More like shoulder shrugging "...don't care..." about what you did
in 1953, Lennie.

MORE SNIP

Been too busy with other things than to come into this
Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth
it with some of these creatures.

And it's obvious that your rant hasn't changed and you've not been
able to find your way to a VE session.

Poor Lennie.

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ