N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

SNIP

Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)

My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.

WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!

What part of this don't you understand??

I understand it all.

I understand you're an idiot.

I understand that you're a basement dwelling parasite that your
poor, aging parents won't be able to rid themselves of save for death.

I understand that in a fit of rage you made a Freudian slip that
disclosed your TRUE power for your pirate radio station whish is a
quantum leap over the Part 15 limits you CLAIM you're observing.

are you some come of ####ing moron??

No, my last name is NOT "Daugherty"

THE FCC MEASURES ELECTRICAL FIELD, POWER IN WATTS CAN PRODUCT
DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL FIELDS DEPENDING ON ANTENNA, FEED LINE AND OTHER
FACTORS...I put in big letters so you can ####ing understand it.

AND LET ME PUT THIS IN BIG LETTERS SO YOU CAN
UNDERSTAND IT...NO ONE HERE (EXCEPT FOR MORKIE, AND HE THINKS PEOPLE
BELEIVE HIS LIES) BELIEVES YOU'RE GENERATING 100 WATTS OF RF IN
ORDER TO RADIATE PART 15 LEVELS OF HF SIGNAL.

AND IF YOU ARE, IT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES WHO THE "MORON"
REALLY IS!

SNIP

Why hasn't the FCC come to my door??

Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is
more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ.

no Steve it's bacuse your a ####ing liar.....plain and simple. You
believe what you want to believe and unless it comes form month it not
true.

I believe you're an idiotic moron.

See...THAT was easy!

And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even
MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe
broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience.

I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie.

Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me.

Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did!

Ahhhh Steve, that's what it really is...You mad because you can hear
the station.....

Nope. I don't listen. What coul YOU possibly have to say on the
air that I can't see here?

And if I am hearing you here, it would be proof that you are
violating Part 15, as I already know you are from your posts here.

BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight
of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the
feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon?

There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi
Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No,
I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it
next year steve, thanks for your concern.

There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an
ultralight as per Part 103.

And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS
illegal.

Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is
illegal...

No.

The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part
103.

Period.

Good...You quit while you were behind...Now go refit that
ultralight to make it legal, TrashMouth.

Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not.

Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than
5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy.

It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not
carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm
carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal.

Reading on...

That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng
a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of
non-compliance.

That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly
HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently
connected, is evidence of non-compliance.

As long as your not using it, there is no violation.

Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a
the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated.

Sure they do in your tiny little mine...

I don't own a mine, Toiddie, although I took a tour of one in
Inyokern, CA, once.

And the FAA and the FCC STILL state that the presence of
illegal modifications, even when not "caught in the act" of being used,
is evidence of failure to comly with thier respective rules and
regulations.

No amount of your pontification about your "freedoms" will change
the FACT that you are implicitly violating several federal laws...

Don't beleive me?

Ask the Department of Justice.

I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy.

I'm Still Waiting for the FCC...but again hey your a liar....

Nope.

Not today...not yesterday...not tomorrow...

BTW, College(Not)Boy...it's "you're" a liar...

(BIG SNIP)

People like you who live "outside the box" in the manner you
describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem
as a law ABIDING person.

No steve people like you who live in the box has no ####ing life, and
it's ashame people like you can't really enjoy life..but hey you go
back it your little box where you belong, leave us REAL people alone..

I have plenty of life, Toiddie...

And I use a lot of it in order to improve myself with...Such as
using the education I was provided with to properly apply English
grammar to my thoughts.

You should try it too.

And I DO enjoy life, Toiddie...And I enjoy it WITHIN the
boundries of the laws as we as Americans are prescribed to do.

There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight
under Part 103 as you have modified it.

Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons,
Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal.

No, it doesn't.

Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal.

Period.

Whatever Steve

Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you
usuallly are.


nice...closet dweller..

Nope...

And you're STILL in violation of Part 103.

(HUGE SNIP)

Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy
to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that
into a buried dummyload.

Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical
field stength not wattage.

You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more
than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency,
Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could
understand that kind of power loss.


Sure it achieve Part 15 requirement I do have that loss....you seem to
have a hard time understanding that...

No...I understand it perfectly well.

YOU screwed up in a fit of rage and actually announced to the world
how much power you really are using for your illegal broadcasting
operation.

You have FURTHER screwed up by announcing all these "QSL card
requests" you are getting...Just more evidence that you're violating
Part 15.

YOU are the MORON if you think the FCC doesn't have engineers that
understand the technical limitations of Part 15 as opposed to what
you're claiming you're accomplishing.

Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur
licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!?

This is Part 15 not amateur, learn that...

I know it, LiarBoy.

And I know that just because you are CLAIMINIG to be a "legal"
Part 15 operator, your "bragging" indicates that you're technically
incompetent

(MORE SNIPPAGE)

And even more.....

Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place,
which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad
you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time.

And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is
adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not
only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you
free service for a long, long time.


Ummm...Dumb### Under a federal Law Internet service providers are
immune for what their users put on third party systems and it has been
upheld by the US Supreme Court.....you sure have a hard time
learning....must be from all that ####ing inbreding going on down
there.

No, Toiddie...the lack of learning is YOURS.

You've gotten canned TWICE now for certain behaviour, yet here you
are, doing it AGAIN!

And College(Not)Boy....It's "inbreeding", not "inbreding"...

And FYI, I am from father North than you...

Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy.,


Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron

Ooooops....There you go again with the profanity...Working on
getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it
easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive
action.

Keep up steve and I'll get you for Cyberstalking, which is a federal
crime...

There's no stalking on MY part, TrashMouth...

YOU keep bringing YOUR mischeviousness HERE...I don't go looking
for you.

Idiot!

I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or
any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or
perhaps the occassional dipole.

I don't use dipole only little closet dwellers like you do...

No closet dwelling here, Toiddie...

And if you care to, you can refer to ARRL DXCC award #37,136.

Dipoles and 100 watts served me just fine.

SNIP

This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech",
Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law,
which EVERY person must do in the United States.


No dumb### there is...but hey I'm still waiting.....maybe if you kiss
the FCC ### a little harder maybe they show up...

After being only the SECOND RRAP'er to get booted off the Internet
TWICE, you still haven't learned a thing, have you?

Maybe the third time will be the charm?

If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15
level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that.

What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this
manner?


To compile with Part 15.....Steve stick with Ham radio better yet I
have some walkie talkies I send you...they seems to be more your speed

What did you "compile" for Part 15?

I know you're compiling violations, but that's nothing new.

And you didn't answer my question, TrashMouth...

WHY would you generate over 100 watts inorder to radiate less than
Part 15 limitis...according to you, that is.......

BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing
not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free
speech of Part 15 radio stations.

What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy?

You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts.

You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were...


Steve I'm going only say this once Your a ####ing idiot..and I'm done,
either put up or shut up

And I'm going to say this until I decide to not say it any
more...Your misuse of the English language proves that your only
"campus time" has been as janitorial staff.

Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 13:26:16 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

SNIP

Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)

My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.

WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!

What part of this don't you understand??

I understand it all.

you understand nothing steve now cease and deisst

Seek the services of a reputable second grade English composition
tutor, Morkie.

QUOTE

N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

SNIP

Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)
My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.
WHY DID YOU NOT ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!

What part of this don't you understand??

I understand it all.

I understand you're an idiot.

I understand that you're a basement dwelling parasite that your
poor, aging parents won't be able to rid themselves of save for death.

I understand that in a fit of rage you made a Freudian slip that
disclosed your TRUE power for your pirate radio station whish is a
quantum leap over the Part 15 limits you CLAIM you're observing.

are you some come of ####ing moron??

No, my last name is NOT "Daugherty"

THE FCC MEASURES ELECTRICAL FIELD, POWER IN WATTS CAN PRODUCT
DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL FIELDS DEPENDING ON ANTENNA, FEED LINE AND OTHER
FACTORS...I put in big letters so you can ####ing understand it.

AND LET ME PUT THIS IN BIG LETTERS SO YOU CAN
UNDERSTAND IT...NO ONE HERE (EXCEPT FOR MORKIE, AND HE THINKS PEOPLE
BELEIVE HIS LIES) BELIEVES YOU'RE GENERATING 100 WATTS OF RF IN
ORDER TO RADIATE PART 15 LEVELS OF HF SIGNAL.

AND IF YOU ARE, IT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES WHO THE "MORON"
REALLY IS!

SNIP

Why hasn't the FCC come to my door??

Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is
more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ.

no Steve it's bacuse your a ####ing liar.....plain and simple. You
believe what you want to believe and unless it comes form month it not
true.

I believe you're an idiotic moron.

See...THAT was easy!

And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even
MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe
broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience.

I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie.

Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me.

Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did!

Ahhhh Steve, that's what it really is...You mad because you can hear
the station.....

Nope. I don't listen. What coul YOU possibly have to say on the
air that I can't see here?

And if I am hearing you here, it would be proof that you are
violating Part 15, as I already know you are from your posts here.

BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight
of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the
feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon?

There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi
Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No,
I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it
next year steve, thanks for your concern.

There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an
ultralight as per Part 103.

And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS
illegal.

Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is
illegal...

No.

The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part
103.

Period.

Good...You quit while you were behind...Now go refit that
ultralight to make it legal, TrashMouth.

Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not.

Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than
5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy.

It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not
carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm
carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal.

Reading on...

That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng
a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of
non-compliance.

That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly
HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently
connected, is evidence of non-compliance.

As long as your not using it, there is no violation.

Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a
the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated.

Sure they do in your tiny little mine...

I don't own a mine, Toiddie, although I took a tour of one in
Inyokern, CA, once.

And the FAA and the FCC STILL state that the presence of
illegal modifications, even when not "caught in the act" of being used,

is evidence of failure to comly with thier respective rules and
regulations.

No amount of your pontification about your "freedoms" will change
the FACT that you are implicitly violating several federal laws...

Don't beleive me?

Ask the Department of Justice.

I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy.


I'm Still Waiting for the FCC...but again hey your a liar....

Nope.

Not today...not yesterday...not tomorrow...

BTW, College(Not)Boy...it's "you're" a liar...

(BIG SNIP)

People like you who live "outside the box" in the manner you
describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem
as a law ABIDING person.

No steve people like you who live in the box has no ####ing life, and
it's ashame people like you can't really enjoy life..but hey you go
back it your little box where you belong, leave us REAL people alone..

I have plenty of life, Toiddie...

And I use a lot of it in order to improve myself with...Such as
using the education I was provided with to properly apply English
grammar to my thoughts.

You should try it too.

And I DO enjoy life, Toiddie...And I enjoy it WITHIN the
boundries of the laws as we as Americans are prescribed to do.

There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight
under Part 103 as you have modified it.

Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons,
Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal.

No, it doesn't.

Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal.

Period.

Whatever Steve

Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you
usuallly are.

nice...closet dweller..

Nope...

And you're STILL in violation of Part 103.

(HUGE SNIP)

Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy
to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that
into a buried dummyload.

Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical
field stength not wattage.

You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more
than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency,
Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could
understand that kind of power loss.

Sure it achieve Part 15 requirement I do have that loss....you seem to
have a hard time understanding that...

No...I understand it perfectly well.

YOU screwed up in a fit of rage and actually announced to the world

how much power you really are using for your illegal broadcasting
operation.

You have FURTHER screwed up by announcing all these "QSL card
requests" you are getting...Just more evidence that you're violating
Part 15.

YOU are the MORON if you think the FCC doesn't have engineers that

understand the technical limitations of Part 15 as opposed to what
you're claiming you're accomplishing.

Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur
licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!?

This is Part 15 not amateur, learn that...

I know it, LiarBoy.

And I know that just because you are CLAIMINIG to be a "legal"
Part 15 operator, your "bragging" indicates that you're technically
incompetent

(MORE SNIPPAGE)

And even more.....

Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place,
which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad
you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time.

And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is
adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not
only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you
free service for a long, long time.

Ummm...Dumb### Under a federal Law Internet service providers are
immune for what their users put on third party systems and it has been
upheld by the US Supreme Court.....you sure have a hard time
learning....must be from all that ####ing inbreding going on down
there.

No, Toiddie...the lack of learning is YOURS.

You've gotten canned TWICE now for certain behaviour, yet here you
are, doing it AGAIN!

And College(Not)Boy....It's "inbreeding", not "inbreding"...

And FYI, I am from father North than you...

Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy.,

Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron

Ooooops....There you go again with the profanity...Working on
getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it
easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive
action.

Keep up steve and I'll get you for Cyberstalking, which is a federal
crime...

There's no stalking on MY part, TrashMouth...

YOU keep bringing YOUR mischeviousness HERE...I don't go looking
for you.

Idiot!

I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or
any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or
perhaps the occassional dipole.

I don't use dipole only little closet dwellers like you do...

No closet dwelling here, Toiddie...

And if you care to, you can refer to ARRL DXCC award #37,136.

Dipoles and 100 watts served me just fine.

SNIP

This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech",
Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law,
which EVERY person must do in the United States.

No dumb### there is...but hey I'm still waiting.....maybe if you kiss
the FCC ### a little harder maybe they show up...

After being only the SECOND RRAP'er to get booted off the Internet

TWICE, you still haven't learned a thing, have you?

Maybe the third time will be the charm?

If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15
level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that.

What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this
manner?

To compile with Part 15.....Steve stick with Ham radio better yet I
have some walkie talkies I send you...they seems to be more your speed

What did you "compile" for Part 15?

I know you're compiling violations, but that's nothing new.

And you didn't answer my question, TrashMouth...

WHY would you generate over 100 watts inorder to radiate less than
Part 15 limitis...according to you, that is.......

BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing
not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free
speech of Part 15 radio stations.

What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy?

You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts.

You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were...

Steve I'm going only say this once Your a ####ing idiot..and I'm done,
either put up or shut up

And I'm going to say this until I decide to not say it any
more...Your misuse of the English language proves that your only
"campus time" has been as janitorial staff.

Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

MorkMakesSo
wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:00:50 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 13:26:16 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

SNIP

Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)

My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.

WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!

What part of this don't you understand??

I understand it all.

you understand nothing steve now cease and deisst

Seek the services of a reputable second grade English composition
tutor, Morkie.

cease and desist you are libeling Todd now

No, I am not.

He's blatantly violating federal law.

You're supporting him.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:06:15 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
MorkMakesSo
wrote:
cease and desist
cease and desist you are libeling Todd now

No, I am not.

yes you are

Nope.

He's blatantly violating federal law.

no evidence exiosts that he is doing so

Sure there is.

In every post wherein he continues this lie about being "Part 15
lega" for "Omega One", and as long as he keeps his ultralight illegally
refit with non-authorized changes.

You're supporting him.

in using his lgitimate rights under law of course I am

What rights?

No one has a right to violate ANY law except in the face of life
threatening circumstances that may mandate deviance from those laws...

cease and desit you interference in lawfull operation

There's no "lawful operation" from N9OGL.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:13:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:06:15 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
MorkMakesSo
wrote:
cease and desist
cease and desist you are libeling Todd now

No, I am not.

yes you are

Nope.

yes you are cease and desist

Nope.

He's blatantly violating federal law.

no evidence exiosts that he is doing so

Sure there is.

In every post wherein he continues this lie about being "Part 15
legal" for "Omega One".

no such post exists legaly and I have have seen now such post that
even suggests it

Try that in English, Fatboy.

you are just trying to proclaim you can measure rf power remotely the
same way you claim to be able to detrime spectroscpy result withotu a
line of sight on me

I didn't claim I could measure anything I couldn't put my hands
on, fatboy.

TrashMouth is the one who stated that he's running 100watts in
13mHz...Not me.

cease and desist

No.

Steve, K4YZ

continues to crosspost to irrelevent NGs:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:21:30 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
m wrote:
cease and desist
you are just trying to proclaim you can measure rf power remotely the
same way you claim to be able to detrime spectroscpy result withotu a
line of sight on me

I didn't claim I could measure anything I couldn't put my hands
on, fatboy.

you claimed you measure the aleged achol on my breath robeson

No, I didn't.

TrashMouth is the one who stated that he's running 100watts in
13mHz...Not me.

so?

So he's admitted that he's in violation of Part 15, fatboy.

the caluattions suggestion one could run that or even a bit more more
own sugested that about 126 watt should still be legal

No one where with an IQ over 3 beleives that he's generating 100
watts of RF and NOT violating Part 15, Morkie...Except YOU, of
course...

cease and desist

No.

making you the harremenning one on usenet

What's "harremenning", Morkie?

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:34:23 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
continues to crosspost to irrelevent NGs:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:21:30 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
m wrote:
cease and desist
you are just trying to proclaim you can measure rf power remotely the
same way you claim to be able to detrime spectroscpy result withotu a
line of sight on me

I didn't claim I could measure anything I couldn't put my hands
on, fatboy.

you claimed you measure the aleged achol on my breath robeson

No, I didn't.

yes you did

Nope.

I claimed you could not know if I was drinking you claimed you cloud
tell by using a spectrograph

Uh huh...And IN PERSON, not 'remotely", fatboy.

why do you lie so much and so badly

I haven't...but you keep hoping I will.

it would be a neat to do a spectromgraph through a solid wall but you
are not one for facts

What's a "spectromgraph"...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:42:54 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:34:23 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
continues to crosspost to irrelevent NGs:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:21:30 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
m wrote:
cease and desist
you are just trying to proclaim you can measure rf power remotely the
same way you claim to be able to detrime spectroscpy result withotu a
line of sight on me

I didn't claim I could measure anything I couldn't put my hands
on, fatboy.

you claimed you measure the aleged achol on my breath robeson

No, I didn't.

yes you did

Nope.

I claimed you could not know if I was drinking you claimed you cloud
tell by using a spectrograph

Uh huh...And IN PERSON, not 'remotely", fatboy.

nope you claimed siting there in Tennesse you could do it

Nope.

cease and desist your harrment you sack of

Now, now. 3-College-Degree Boy...SURELY you can express yourself
better than with profanity...?!?!

Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:47:31 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:

cease and desist.

Cease and desist what?

nope you claimed siting there in Tennesse you could do it

Nope.

yes you made that rediculous claim

What's rediculous is you claiming I said it.

cease and desist your harrment you sack of ####

Now, now. 3-College-Degree Boy...SURELY you can express yourself
better than with profanity...?!?!

not to the likes of you

Morkie, I am not the one who defers to profanity.

YOU are.

Idiot.

yes you are

Nope.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:54:29 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:47:31 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:

cease and desist.

Cease and desist what?

your harrassment and libel

What harrassment and libel?

you lying

What lying (other than yours...?!?!)

not to the likes of you

Morkie, I am not the one who defers to profanity.

nope you the net cop don't even understand the concepts of Profanity
and Vulgarity

Sure I do.

your content however merits vulgarity in repsonse
you are always quite vulgar

Nope.

Steve, K4YZ