"Demon Lord of Confusion" wrote in message
news
[Hint for whoever started the x-posts from rec.radio.*: Using AUK to do
your dirty work often backfires.]

Unfortunately it was Mark Morgan's personnel trolls from rec.radio.policy
When Mark started posting to our group rec.radio.cb, his first post was
about putting beer in his rectum (just a bit off topic IMHO). He cross
posted to policy which brought his entourage of trolls with him. One of them
decided to x-post to AUK and ta-daaaa, here you are. I hate that our group
has to suffer from Mark and his trollers, but what's done is done so I'm in
for the ride I guess. Where do I cast my votes and or nominate candidates, I
might as well adapt to the environment, eh?

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:56:38 -0500, DrDeath did most oddly state:

"Demon Lord of Confusion" wrote in message
news
[Hint for whoever started the x-posts from rec.radio.*: Using AUK to do
your dirty work often backfires.]

Unfortunately it was Mark Morgan's personnel trolls from rec.radio.policy
When Mark started posting to our group rec.radio.cb, his first post was
about putting beer in his rectum (just a bit off topic IMHO). He cross
posted to policy which brought his entourage of trolls with him. One of
them decided to x-post to AUK and ta-daaaa, here you are. I hate that our
group has to suffer from Mark and his trollers, but what's done is done so
I'm in for the ride I guess. Where do I cast my votes and or nominate
candidates, I might as well adapt to the environment, eh?

Oh, quite -- I like your attitude. For tips on how to identify k00ks, go
to the link, and check out answers 6, 7, and 21-25. This is from the FAQ:

http://www.netcabal.com/auk/faq.html

8. How do I present a Kook on this group?

The preferred technique is to get the suspected Kook to start posting to
AUK so that we can all see him/her/it in all their first-hand Glory. You
can do this by posting followups to the suspect's weirder messages, with
your followups nonchalantly crossposted to AUK. If the suspect responds
to your messages without editing the Newsgroups line, you've achieved
your goal.

Another acceptable method is to repost, complete and unedited, one or
two of the suspected Kook's recent rants. If you do this, please provide
a brief intro in the header describing what the hell you're doing, such
as indicating who this person is, what group you found the message on,
or why you think the rest of us should give a rat's @$$ about it.

You should be aware that if you try this with some perfectly reasonable
posting, you may be flamed to net.hell and back and probably suspected
of being a net.loon yourself. It is also considered extremely lame to
nominate someone as a Kook simply because you have lost, or at least
failed to win, a debate with them; persistently doing so is likely to
get you nominated for Kook Awards. That someone fails to perceive the
self-evident, unassailable wisdom of your viewpoint does not, in and of
itself, constitute Kookery.

===========================================

Remember, logic is a kookologist's first tool, then flaming and trolling,
and always humorously, if possible (dealing with Outer Filth is not
usually very funny, as a rule, for example).

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
July 2006 Looney Maroon Nomination:
http://www.lunarplanner.com/HolyCross.html#Timing
Vote Chuck Lysaght for Tar & Feathers!
Ballot coming Sept 1st!