Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"anonymous" wrote in message
can an unlicensed person using radio technology to violate part 15 still be in violation if he had a ham license (we're talking about using 802.11A at full power for a 10 mile shot folks!). I didn't look up any rules or sections of law anywhere, so I guess I'm answering a question blindly. I'm in Canada, but I felt compelled to answer even if I misunderstood the question. I believe that government has written into law that a licensed ham should only use the power, or enough power required or necessary to communicate. Ten miles down the road is not a really great distance, contrary to what some CBers think, so maybe you could still use smoke signals to communicate unless you are then violating pollution-control laws, and or harming the tree environment/ecology system of the area by burning code into the sky. I think that this part of the law still stands in Canada....that one should only use enough power to communicate whether it be an emergency or not. If I missed your intention by 10 miles, please ignore this post. Thanks, Jack |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ethical question | Antenna | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Equipment |