Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message news ![]() wrote: MnMikew wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message thlink.net... Why are you people against having good hams? SC If you're one then it's already ****ed. sthat heis superior and Wismen in his many avatar is superior and that Robeson who threatens the murder of people he disagrees with all are according to SC superior hams Is this un-readable USA english from a USA ham? with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling do u hav anyting cognet two say? my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... Why are you people against having good hams? Go back to rec.radio.amateur.policy Lloyd. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: My wife and I had aged ham at Easter. Tasted like chicken. I have a turkey ham sandwich in my hand at the moment. Enjoy! :-) Everyone else ought to remember the definition of ham: "Ham is the butchered meat of swine." There...now THAT's a troll! :-) either way, its still a dead farm animal |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Morgan wrote:
SNIPPED Is this un-readable USA english from a USA ham? with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling do u hav anyting cognet two say? my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ Do you? I can't read your version of 'inklyshe' |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in
om: Slow Code wrote: Why are you people against having good hams? We're certainly are not against good hams. If code skill is representative of hams like you, we are against any other low-IQ-products-of-incest being allowed into this otherwise nice hobby. Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago? SC |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Dave Heil on Thurs, Sep 28 2006 8:07 am
wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: My wife and I had aged ham at Easter. Tasted like chicken. I have a turkey ham sandwich in my hand at the moment. Enjoy! :-) Everyone else ought to remember the definition of ham: "Ham is the butchered meat of swine." There...now THAT's a troll! :-) [...and Heil, 51 cards short in his Humor Deck, wrote: ] It surely is. E-Look provides the following definitions: 1. [noun] meat cut from the thigh of a hog (usually smoked) Synonyms: jambon, gammon 2. [noun] (Old Testament) son of Noah Synonyms: Ham 3. [noun] a licensed amateur radio operator In an amateur radio newsgroup, which definition might be used? ALL of them. :-) In THIS newsgroup though, at least two more definitions would ALSO apply. [hint: look in your mirror for them] No fair asking for assistance! Not even the ARRL? Tsk, tsk, the ARRL already defined "ham" for amateur radio operators. It was a PEJORATIVE term applied by professional radiotelegraphers on amateurs. Look it up on their website. :-) Superfluous newsgroups trimmed. What?!? You don't want to BROADCAST your vital, important, items of YOUR "definitions" (cribbed from a web page instead of being printed by real ink on real paper in a book) ? :-) As always to you, ByteBrothers famous phrase invoked! |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote in om: Slow Code wrote: Why are you people against having good hams? We're certainly are not against good hams. If code skill is representative of hams like you, we are against any other low-IQ-products-of-incest being allowed into this otherwise nice hobby. Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago? SC 25 years? Probably about the same, since repeaters had been around at least 10 years by then. You could by a repeater over the counter with tone squelch, and several other toys built in, so they were no more complicated than a 2 meter handheld. My high school Amateur radio club built a two meter repeater of of Motorola and GE strips, homebrew powers supplies, diplexer, and timers in the late '60s. What is the big deal, unless you have multiple sites and voting receivers? We were just a bunch of RF crazy teenagers with less than $50 to spend, and we wanted to build a repeater. A few months later we were given a surplus WE Touch TOne decoder module, and added a phone patch. Like everything else the club did, we raised the funds by repairing old electronics and selling it to buy the parts we needed for the next project. the only new piece of equipment we ever purchases was a HW-16, in kit form. BTW, CW was the least used form of communications from the club's station. they could do that at home, but we had some nice antennas, the two meter repeater, and several full coverage HF rigs. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Thurs, Sep 28 2006 8:07 am wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: My wife and I had aged ham at Easter. Tasted like chicken. I have a turkey ham sandwich in my hand at the moment. Enjoy! :-) Everyone else ought to remember the definition of ham: "Ham is the butchered meat of swine." There...now THAT's a troll! :-) [...and Heil, 51 cards short in his Humor Deck, wrote: ] You've used it fifteen or twenty times as a swipe at ham radio operators. Am I supposed to find it any more amusing than I found it the first time you used it? It surely is. E-Look provides the following definitions: 1. [noun] meat cut from the thigh of a hog (usually smoked) Synonyms: jambon, gammon 2. [noun] (Old Testament) son of Noah Synonyms: Ham 3. [noun] a licensed amateur radio operator In an amateur radio newsgroup, which definition might be used? ALL of them. :-) So we're sons of Noah, are we? In THIS newsgroup though, at least two more definitions would ALSO apply. [hint: look in your mirror for them] I don't see any definitions in the mirror, Len. Maybe you have the one that came with your spiffy ISP's package. No fair asking for assistance! Not even the ARRL? You should have been able to come up with it on your own. You got it wrong. Tsk, tsk, the ARRL already defined "ham" for amateur radio operators. It was a PEJORATIVE term applied by professional radiotelegraphers on amateurs. Look it up on their website. :-) Did you really think that I didn't know where the term came from, Leonard? Sheesh! Superfluous newsgroups trimmed. What?!? You don't want to BROADCAST your vital, important, items of YOUR "definitions" (cribbed from a web page instead of being printed by real ink on real paper in a book) ? :-) They're hardly my definitions if they're cribbed from a web site. Cribbing from a web site is no different than cribbing from a book. Where did you get *your* definition--you know, the wrong one? As always to you, ByteBrothers famous phrase invoked! I'm not familiar with that. What is it? See IEEE Code of Ethics Dave K8MN |