Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well said.
"james" wrote in message ... On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:52:24 -0400, "Fred G." wrote: +++Neither the Code NOR Theory tests will weed out the bad radio operator any +++more than a driving test will weed out the DUIs - OR - the Physical agility, +++legal and other exams will weed out bad cops. Those tests are only tests of +++"Proficiency" in the subject matter - NOT - "Mentality". Those tests won't +++stop the trash. +++But those who choose to not learn code will continue to bitch about why they +++shouldn't. OK, DROP the code........Next you'll want the "Theory" taken away +++too. Want to bet? +++ +++Fred G. ******************* Fred The theory questions even the extra exam is not that difficult. A decent electronics tech with an AA degree can master that test. In fact the tests are so dummied down that just about anyone that has the ability read and comprehend can pass them with the minimal of coaching. So if you think so highly your "Theory" tests then I hate to burst your bubble. Why should proficiency in one means of communication hender operation in another? I tend to think that those that are very proficient with morse code tend to spend more of their time with that mode of communication. Why should there be a limitation on other modes that do not wish to use that mode? Most hams learn morse code and then forget it. I have no issue with showing proficiency in a means of communication to get priviledges. I have no issues with showing a proficiency with "theory" as a means of priviledges. The thing here is usage of the airwaves is a priviledge and not a right. So what ever the government cares to do in this avenue is fine with me. I will take advantage of what ever they offer me. james |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|