Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() If they're smart, they most likely think a ham radio operator is skilled and knows morse code. SC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark in the Dark, wrote in
: On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:15 GMT, Slow Code wrote: If they're smart, they most likely think a ham radio operator is skilled and knows morse code. Bull**** You're not a real ham, you don't know CW and you're not skilled. Learn CW! SC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Slow Code" wrote in message
SC Personally, I think, "Well, I can darn sure be certain that ham is NOT slow idiot!" JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Nov 2006 04:57:02 -0800, Secwet Woger wrote:
No you only have the beginner's training wheel ham license, dumbass. When you get a more advanced license, you can become as cool as Woger is like this: GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lloyd wrote in :
GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. ROFL, I always laugh at that one. I wonder why ol Two-test hasn't been around much. Maybe too much ham radio talk. SC |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: Lloyd wrote in : GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. ROFL, I always laugh at that one. But then you ARE easily amused huh, bright shiny objects seem to capture all your attention. I wonder why ol Two-test hasn't been around much. Maybe too much ham radio talk. "Two-test" Slow **** makes good sentence. Slow **** is so stupid, he rehashes 6 year old bull****. Roger still PASSED his retest and upgraded, something you couldn't do. The letters to both Wiseman and Tunder were a preemptive "warning" that did not allege any activities. That hardly qualifies as a warning in the context of someone having actually done something. The letter with the warning in it ALLEGED interference, and warned of consequences. The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number of reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the addressee's actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the test, would be a good example. Only one letter was a warning referring to interference. But then Republicans aren't noted for telling the truth, are they? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |