Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On 1 Jan 2007 14:01:34 -0800, " wrote: wrote: On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:01:57 -0500, "Dee Flint" wrote: "John Smith I" wrote in message ... wrote: REAL debate is "enjoyable" only if there is "agreement" on a point of view of one side or the other. Too bad for 3Ms, FCC 06-178 has already been announced and that will be that. NOW we will see who is the most-holy, self-righteous person inhabiting this Din of Inequity! All I gotta say is that retribution is mighty sweet! :-) it has a sacrin (how does one spell that comon artifical sweetner) taste to me although I am pleased and other than the fact I can't get that song I first in the movies "independace day' (It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine) out of my head as read the pressings of the grapes. Not to worry on the spelling of the word "saccharin." We will all be blessed with sacrament of spelling laid upon us by N2EY or K8MN along with many NON-saccharine comments! :-) Indeed, the noise of the grape press busy at work is making it difficult for me to watch the Rose Bowl game! :-) LA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | Policy | |||
TrunkPCR version 0.8.200 Now Available | Scanner | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |