On Jan 28, 1:48�am, John Smith I wrote:
John Smith I wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:

Just so you have a complete picture of Paul W. Schleck, I took the
following from one of his posts in news.groups.proposals:
...
Now that just speaks volumes about this man, his caliber, his "ethical
standards", etc. *Now, doesn't it?

What's wrong with what he wrote?

Gawd! *I feel sick ...

Warmest regards,
JS

Unbelievable, is there ANYONE here who believes Mr. Schlock... err, Mr.
Schleck would be "fair" and just to ALL? *That he would consider
ANYTHING other than his own petty gripes and bitches? *If so, step right
up here to defend the man, I am waiting ...

I'm willing to give him and his group of moderators a chance.

Why aren't you?

My gawd, the man is so crooked he makes my dogs hind legs look straight!

Exactly how is he "crooked"?

And just to give a complete pictu

Paul has been a No Code Test advocate for many years. I have
been a Pro Code Test advocate for many years. Yet we are both
willing to read each other's postings without personal attacks.

I know some of the folks in the group of moderators. They are
all across the range of opinion on various subjects. I agree with
some and disagree with others.

The big question is this:

To my knowledge, there has never been a moderated amateur
radio newsgroup on Usenet. So this project is something
completely new, progressive and different. We're supposed to
support such things, aren't we?

If someone is really interested in discussing amateur radio issues,
why would they not give the new, progressive and different
newsgroup a chance, without prejudging the result before it
begins?

Perhaps the problem some folks have is that they know they
won't be able to post unsubstantiated claims or ad hominem
attacks - and that just takes out all the fun for them.

Jim, N2EY