Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it legal to modify a 2-meter amateur radio transceiver to transmit
on all frequencies it can receive? It seems to me that such a modification could be useful in case of an emergency. Additionally, as long as the power is limited to 2 watts, it should be legal on MURS bands, right? Nelson Blaha |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 12:00 pm, "KE5MBX" wrote:
Is it legal to modify a 2-meter amateur radio transceiver to transmit on all frequencies it can receive? It seems to me that such a modification could be useful in case of an emergency. Additionally, as long as the power is limited to 2 watts, it should be legal on MURS bands, right? First question, is it legal to modify your 2 meter rig... Yes, but that does not make it legal to actually use on these new frequencies. Other radio services generally require FCC certification of the equipment for it to be used legally. For example, you can modify your 10 Meter rig to have the capacity to transmit on 11 Meters (CB) but you legally cannot transmit on the new frequencies unless your radio is certified for that service (which it won't be in this case.) Ham Radio enjoys the privilege to build and modify equipment for Part 97 operation without formal certification, so you can take a CB and re- tune it to 10 Meters if you want, just not the other way. Also you can only do this on a limited basis. For instance, you can build an HF amplifier for your own use without FCC certification, but once you start building them to sell you must get FCC certification for a part 97 device. For your second question: No, it would not be legal to use a Part 97 certified device (modified or not) in any other service that required use of FCC certified equipment. Part 95 (MURS) specifically requires that equipment being used is certified for that Part and does not allow equipment certified under other parts to be used. Your Part 97 certified 2 meter rig, modified to use on Part 95 frequencies would be illegal. Now, would the FCC care in the case of a true emergency? I doubt they would. But it's a chance you are taking. I don't care to loose my hard won license this way... -= bob =- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 2:46 pm, "KC4UAI" wrote:
On Jan 31, 12:00 pm, "KE5MBX" wrote: Is it legal to modify a 2-meter amateur radio transceiver to transmit on all frequencies it can receive? It seems to me that such a modification could be useful in case of an emergency. Additionally, as long as the power is limited to 2 watts, it should be legal on MURS bands, right? First question, is it legal to modify your 2 meter rig... Yes, but that does not make it legal to actually use on these new frequencies. Other radio services generally require FCC certification of the equipment for it to be used legally. For example, you can modify your 10 Meter rig to have the capacity to transmit on 11 Meters (CB) but you legally cannot transmit on the new frequencies unless your radio is certified for that service (which it won't be in this case.) Ham Radio enjoys the privilege to build and modify equipment for Part 97 operation without formal certification, so you can take a CB and re- tune it to 10 Meters if you want, just not the other way. Also you can only do this on a limited basis. For instance, you can build an HF amplifier for your own use without FCC certification, but once you start building them to sell you must get FCC certification for a part 97 device. For your second question: No, it would not be legal to use a Part 97 certified device (modified or not) in any other service that required use of FCC certified equipment. Part 95 (MURS) specifically requires that equipment being used is certified for that Part and does not allow equipment certified under other parts to be used. Your Part 97 certified 2 meter rig, modified to use on Part 95 frequencies would be illegal. Now, would the FCC care in the case of a true emergency? I doubt they would. But it's a chance you are taking. I don't care to loose my hard won license this way... -= bob =- I agree on the MURS part after doing some reading. Seems to me though that "you may use any means at your disposal in case of an emergency" as the tech test says. I think you would even be legal in an emergency. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KE5MBX" wrote in message oups.com... On Jan 31, 2:46 pm, "KC4UAI" wrote: On Jan 31, 12:00 pm, "KE5MBX" wrote: Is it legal to modify a 2-meter amateur radio transceiver to transmit on all frequencies it can receive? It seems to me that such a modification could be useful in case of an emergency. Additionally, as long as the power is limited to 2 watts, it should be legal on MURS bands, right? First question, is it legal to modify your 2 meter rig... Yes, but that does not make it legal to actually use on these new frequencies. Other radio services generally require FCC certification of the equipment for it to be used legally. For example, you can modify your 10 Meter rig to have the capacity to transmit on 11 Meters (CB) but you legally cannot transmit on the new frequencies unless your radio is certified for that service (which it won't be in this case.) Ham Radio enjoys the privilege to build and modify equipment for Part 97 operation without formal certification, so you can take a CB and re- tune it to 10 Meters if you want, just not the other way. Also you can only do this on a limited basis. For instance, you can build an HF amplifier for your own use without FCC certification, but once you start building them to sell you must get FCC certification for a part 97 device. For your second question: No, it would not be legal to use a Part 97 certified device (modified or not) in any other service that required use of FCC certified equipment. Part 95 (MURS) specifically requires that equipment being used is certified for that Part and does not allow equipment certified under other parts to be used. Your Part 97 certified 2 meter rig, modified to use on Part 95 frequencies would be illegal. Now, would the FCC care in the case of a true emergency? I doubt they would. But it's a chance you are taking. I don't care to loose my hard won license this way... -= bob =- I agree on the MURS part after doing some reading. Seems to me though that "you may use any means at your disposal in case of an emergency" as the tech test says. I think you would even be legal in an emergency. The catch is that the authorities define what constitutes a sufficiently severe emergency to warrant it not you. Dee, N8UZE |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KE5MBX wrote:
I agree on the MURS part after doing some reading. Seems to me though that "you may use any means at your disposal in case of an emergency" as the tech test says. I think you would even be legal in an emergency. I once ran out of gas on I10 in West Texas at night during sub-freezing weather. After trying 146.52 for about 20 minutes with no response, I considered that to be enough of an emergency to tune my IC-706 to 4w AM on the CB trucker's channel and ask for help. A kind trucker gave me a lift to the next town and another trucker gave me a lift back to my vehicle. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KE5MBX" wrote in message ups.com... Is it legal to modify a 2-meter amateur radio transceiver to transmit on all frequencies it can receive? It seems to me that such a modification could be useful in case of an emergency. Additionally, as long as the power is limited to 2 watts, it should be legal on MURS bands, right? Nelson Blaha parinoioa prehaps? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee Flint" wrote in message . .. "KE5MBX" wrote in message oups.com... On Jan 31, 2:46 pm, "KC4UAI" wrote: On Jan 31, 12:00 pm, "KE5MBX" wrote: Is it legal to modify a 2-meter amateur radio transceiver to transmit on all frequencies it can receive? It seems to me that such a modification could be useful in case of an emergency. Additionally, as long as the power is limited to 2 watts, it should be legal on MURS bands, right? First question, is it legal to modify your 2 meter rig... Yes, but that does not make it legal to actually use on these new frequencies. Other radio services generally require FCC certification of the equipment for it to be used legally. For example, you can modify your 10 Meter rig to have the capacity to transmit on 11 Meters (CB) but you legally cannot transmit on the new frequencies unless your radio is certified for that service (which it won't be in this case.) Ham Radio enjoys the privilege to build and modify equipment for Part 97 operation without formal certification, so you can take a CB and re- tune it to 10 Meters if you want, just not the other way. Also you can only do this on a limited basis. For instance, you can build an HF amplifier for your own use without FCC certification, but once you start building them to sell you must get FCC certification for a part 97 device. For your second question: No, it would not be legal to use a Part 97 certified device (modified or not) in any other service that required use of FCC certified equipment. Part 95 (MURS) specifically requires that equipment being used is certified for that Part and does not allow equipment certified under other parts to be used. Your Part 97 certified 2 meter rig, modified to use on Part 95 frequencies would be illegal. Now, would the FCC care in the case of a true emergency? I doubt they would. But it's a chance you are taking. I don't care to loose my hard won license this way... -= bob =- I agree on the MURS part after doing some reading. Seems to me though that "you may use any means at your disposal in case of an emergency" as the tech test says. I think you would even be legal in an emergency. The catch is that the authorities define what constitutes a sufficiently severe emergency to warrant it not you. Dee, N8UZE truer words are not likely to be soken -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Jan 31, 9:28 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote: "KE5MBX" wrote in message oups.com... On Jan 31, 2:46 pm, "KC4UAI" wrote: On Jan 31, 12:00 pm, "KE5MBX" wrote: Is it legal to modify a 2-meter amateur radio transceiver to transmit on all frequencies it can receive? It seems to me that such a modification could be useful in case of an emergency. Additionally, as long as the power is limited to 2 watts, it should be legal on MURS bands, right? First question, is it legal to modify your 2 meter rig... Yes, but that does not make it legal to actually use on these new frequencies. Other radio services generally require FCC certification of the equipment for it to be used legally. For example, you can modify your 10 Meter rig to have the capacity to transmit on 11 Meters (CB) but you legally cannot transmit on the new frequencies unless your radio is certified for that service (which it won't be in this case.) Ham Radio enjoys the privilege to build and modify equipment for Part 97 operation without formal certification, so you can take a CB and re- tune it to 10 Meters if you want, just not the other way. Also you can only do this on a limited basis. For instance, you can build an HF amplifier for your own use without FCC certification, but once you start building them to sell you must get FCC certification for a part 97 device. For your second question: No, it would not be legal to use a Part 97 certified device (modified or not) in any other service that required use of FCC certified equipment. Part 95 (MURS) specifically requires that equipment being used is certified for that Part and does not allow equipment certified under other parts to be used. Your Part 97 certified 2 meter rig, modified to use on Part 95 frequencies would be illegal. Now, would the FCC care in the case of a true emergency? I doubt they would. But it's a chance you are taking. I don't care to loose my hard won license this way... -= bob =- I agree on the MURS part after doing some reading. Seems to me though that "you may use any means at your disposal in case of an emergency" as the tech test says. I think you would even be legal in an emergency. The catch is that the authorities define what constitutes a sufficiently severe emergency to warrant it not you. but they do so in theory in accordance with the standards laid out in the rules which define an emergency roughly as anything the endagering life or the safety of property a fairly broad standard and did even this receive some expantion to include health and welfare traffic by folks working outside their preveldges recently? you sil aint me woger -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 7:58 pm, "KE5MBX" I agree on the
MURS part after doing some reading. Seems to me though that "you may use any means at your disposal in case of an emergency" as the tech test says. I think you would even be legal in an emergency. Yea, sorry I didn't make that clear... In a true emergency you would be "legal".. But how I define a true emergency and how the FCC does may be different and I don't intend to argue the point with them unless it's *really* clear cut. (and I don't have a working cell phone on my person at the time.) Personally, I'd expect to get better results on 2 Meters than expecting somebody on the MURS service to help. I'd also expect that if you are in a location where nobody is listening to the repeaters, nobody is going to be hearing you on MURS bands either. I just don't see the purpose in doing the modification myself. A more useful way to deal with this is to add more ham bands to your mobile capabilities. 10 Meters, 6 Meters and 440 are all good mobile options. That and a recent copy of the Repeater Directory will get you more help in almost all cases I can think of. -= bob =- |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 2:50 pm, "KC4UAI" wrote:
On Jan 31, 7:58 pm, "KE5MBX" I agree on the MURS part after doing some reading. Seems to me though that "you may use any means at your disposal in case of an emergency" as the tech test says. I think you would even be legal in an emergency. Yea, sorry I didn't make that clear... In a true emergency you would be "legal".. But how I define a true emergency and how the FCC does may be different and I don't intend to argue the point with them unless it's *really* clear cut. (and I don't have a working cell phone on my person at the time.) Personally, I'd expect to get better results on 2 Meters than expecting somebody on the MURS service to help. I'd also expect that if you are in a location where nobody is listening to the repeaters, nobody is going to be hearing you on MURS bands either. I just don't see the purpose in doing the modification myself. A more useful way to deal with this is to add more ham bands to your mobile capabilities. 10 Meters, 6 Meters and 440 are all good mobile options. That and a recent copy of the Repeater Directory will get you more help in almost all cases I can think of. -= bob =- Well, the idea for emergencies is not so much the MURS as the police frequencies. Thanks for your opinion. Nelson |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave |