Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That says it all. CW is green. Hams interested in reducing global warming
will convert to QRP which operates much better under CW. Sure, I have no problem with those AM 1.5KW power hogs as long as they can spend the money but even affluent Hams with a conscience will convert to CW QRP to reduce energy. All hams should be given a carbon ration. Then, those who use tiny amounts of it on 5W CW QRP can sell their extra credits to allow the new and old uncoded 20m phone SSB blasters to continue their wasteful ways. Ham carbon credits could be traded and sold as a commodity at the ARRL site as a service. Solar, biodesil, ethanol, human powered generators and other carbon neutral energy sources would not need to accout for carbon ration questions. FCC would define an equitable ration for each ham. This might also inspire the creation of new off grid station power sources which would have several logistical advantages. How do you like my idea? :-) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
That says it all. CW is green. Hams interested in reducing global warming will convert to QRP which operates much better under CW. Sure, I have no problem with those AM 1.5KW power hogs as long as they can spend the money but even affluent Hams with a conscience will convert to CW QRP to reduce energy. All hams should be given a carbon ration. Then, those who use tiny amounts of it on 5W CW QRP can sell their extra credits to allow the new and old uncoded 20m phone SSB blasters to continue their wasteful ways. Ham carbon credits could be traded and sold as a commodity at the ARRL site as a service. Solar, biodesil, ethanol, human powered generators and other carbon neutral energy sources would not need to accout for carbon ration questions. FCC would define an equitable ration for each ham. This might also inspire the creation of new off grid station power sources which would have several logistical advantages. How do you like my idea? :-) Stefan: That post is so full of "hot air" it'd run a rig for a month off the methane! ROFLOL! Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 28, 12:26 am, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
That says it all. CW is green. Hams interested in reducing global warming will convert to QRP which operates much better under CW. Sure, I have no problem with those AM 1.5KW power hogs as long as they can spend the money but even affluent Hams with a conscience will convert to CW QRP to reduce energy. All hams should be given a carbon ration. Then, those who use tiny amounts of it on 5W CW QRP can sell their extra credits to allow the new and old uncoded 20m phone SSB blasters to continue their wasteful ways. Ham carbon credits could be traded and sold as a commodity at the ARRL site as a service. Solar, biodesil, ethanol, human powered generators and other carbon neutral energy sources would not need to accout for carbon ration questions. FCC would define an equitable ration for each ham. This might also inspire the creation of new off grid station power sources which would have several logistical advantages. How do you like my idea? :-) When I hear Algore communicating with CW, I'll give it a second look. It just didn't impress me the first time around. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
When I hear Algore communicating with CW, I'll give it a second look. It just didn't impress me the first time around. Algore's too busy inventing the Internet and paying his $3000/mo electric bill for his 10k/sqft house. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 3:26?pm, wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 11:36:55 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Feb 28, 3:03?pm, wrote: just another stlaking thread Another WHAT thread, collegeboy? And why the dodge of my questions in the previous post in this thread, ya COWARD..?!?! QUOTE: What abusing of the new NG, fatboy? I don't see you there. Lennie's crossed over, but he only made two posts before starting in on his own ad homien attacks. We'll see ho long it takes him to really dig in...I don't give him a week. he can't help himself. Now..to address my previous comments in this thread...What's the REAL excuse keeping you from erecting an HF antenna when you had already claimed to have one? UNQUOTE You gonna avoid answering these questions, too? Steve, K4YZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 3:44�pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:26?pm, wrote: On 1 Mar 2007 11:36:55 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Feb 28, 3:03?pm, wrote: just another stlaking thread * * Another WHAT thread, collegeboy? * * And why the dodge of my questions in the previous post in this thread, ya COWARD..?!?! QUOTE: * * *What abusing of the new NG, fatboy? * * I don't see you there. * * Lennie's crossed over, but he only made two posts before starting in on his own ad homien attacks. *We'll see ho long it takes him to really dig in...I don't give him a week. *he can't help himself. * * Now..to address my previous comments in this thread...What's the REAL excuse keeping you from erecting an HF antenna when you had already claimed to have one? UNQUOTE * * You gonna avoid answering these questions, too? Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME | Policy | |||
For The Benefit Of Lloydie and Toddie | Policy | |||
Radio call letters: What do they mean? | Broadcasting | |||
Permanent ISS Amateur Radio Station, Human Crews Share Fourth Anniversary | Shortwave | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General |