Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 8th 03, 11:21 PM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Arnie Macy" wrote in message ...
"Brian" wrote ...

Arnie, go ahead and let her take your answer. No sense in both of you
being wrong.
__________________________________________________ ___________________

Not so fast there, Brian. NCI has been on the record as saying that the
tests should be made less technical. Not a far leap at all to presume they
will try and "dumb" them down even more.

Arnie -
KT4ST


Arnie, citation please. It is the disgruntled PCTA that have
advocated a "No Test International" concept.

I do not speak for NCI, but am on record for saying that the entry
level exam is far to technical for an entry level license, and the
entry level priveleges of 1,500 watts of UHF radiation are far too
great for an entry level safety.

Of course, the Technician license was never meant to be an entry
license, being the consolation prize for General-level knowledge w/o
the outdated, superfluous and irrelevant psycho-motor skills to
twiddle a paddle at 13wpm.

Brian
  #14   Report Post  
Old July 9th 03, 12:58 AM
Phil Kane
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 01:46:08 -0400, Arnie Macy wrote:

"Penny Traytion" wrote ...

No Test International.

_________________________________________________ _________

Dang it, Penny. You took my answer. ;-)


That's where I draw the line......

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane


  #16   Report Post  
Old July 9th 03, 02:22 AM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mike Coslo writes:

Actually as a point of interest, and maybe a little trolling, Just WHY
should there be testing for a ham license?


Because we already know what happens with no testing.

Isn't limiting access to the Airwaves to only those who pass some kind
of test Elitist?


Nope.

What of those who simply aren't smart enough to pass a test? are they
not human and have rights?


Everyone has the right to take the test. Nobody has the right to a guaranteed
pass on the test.

As for RF safety, I would point to the successful efforts of Motorcycle


riders to abolish helmet rules. It should be the individual's
responsibility to decide if RF safety matters are important to him or her.


Actually, that makes sense IF the effects can be contained to just the person
making the decision. But that's rarely the case.

As for mode specific questions, they have no business asking me about
modes of operation that I am not interested in.


I learned about televison screen aspect ratio and interlaced scanning because
it was in the Extra study guide back when. I've never operated ATV.

No Test International could be born now!

Thoughts?

See my rant on replacing the code test with a Smith Chart test.

73 de Jim, N2EY


  #17   Report Post  
Old July 9th 03, 03:04 AM
D. Stussy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Bert Craig wrote:
Now that the ITU treaty requirement re. CW is gone, (For all intents and
purposes.) does that mean NCI's job is done? If not, what's next?


EXTINCTION.
  #18   Report Post  
Old July 9th 03, 03:24 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert Casey writes:

Why do people outside the USA call countries "states"?


Because "state" means "country". It meant that to the US founders,
too: in 18th century English, they named us "The United Nations of
America", and envisioned each state as sovereign except in matters of
war and commerce.

Subsequent developments robbed states of their autonomy, and reduced
them to provinces. Pity.

Regards,
Len.

  #19   Report Post  
Old July 9th 03, 04:28 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aw, Phil. You're spoiling the fun. There shouldn't be tests. Not even
driving tests. That way, the drunks who kill folks won't have a license to
take away. That would violate their rights. Of course, they'd still end up
in jail, but if they don't cause any injuries nor accidents, let 'em drive
on! Say, btw, I hadn't thought of hunting since they outlawed lead. Phil,
could you put me in touch with someone in the government that would sell me
some spent uranium so I could use that for the 12 gauge? It would carry a
lot farther than lead shot!

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



"Phil Kane" wrote in message
.net...
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 13:21:41 GMT, wrote:

Actually as a point of interest, and maybe a little trolling,


Okay, I'll bite.

Just WHY should there be testing for a ham license? Isn't limiting
access to the Airwaves to only those who pass some kind of test
Elitist?


Worse, isn't it a violation of the first amendment? Isn't forbidding
me to operate a transmitter the same as forbidding me to operate a
printing press?


No and no. The Supreme Court of the United States has so ruled on
both questions. Let's find a better reason.

As for mode specific questions, they have no business asking me
about modes of operation that I am not interested in.


Right--they should only cover high-power broadcasts, comsat hijacking
and signal-jamming my rivals...


Whatever is important..... but you left out surreptitious hacking of
secure communications.

ggg

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 7/4/03


  #20   Report Post  
Old July 9th 03, 04:55 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim,

I'm going to have to look up that one. I recently went to Burger King (sigh
....). They were running a special - two burgers and two small fries for
$2.22. I ordered four burgers and four small fries only onions and ketchup
on the burgers (this is a very difficult problem; break out the slip stick
and multiply $2.22 times two). Now add two Whopper Juniors at $0.99 each.
Um ... about 2 seconds to come up with $6.42. Then the sales tax. Ok.
This poor gal starts pressing all these buttons and comes up with something
very close to $10.00. I asked her what the sales tax was. 8%. Wrong.
8.25%, but I was being accessed nearly 50%. She looked hopelessly lost, so
I offered that it should be $6.42 plus 8.25%, or something short of $7.00.
She started pressing more buttons. She smiled, hit enter (or whatever) and
then expressed dismay as the total was now around $15.00. She called the
manager over. He explained what she did wrong, hit some buttons, smiled ...
and stared at the total - now over $29.00. I was beginning to think I'd be
better off at Radio Shack. This problem is a *lot* bigger than amateur
radio. They threw out the regents math test in New York since so many kids
failed. I recall one point was made that it included geometry (unfair).
Huh? I don't know what folks think math includes, but if it is button
pushing, I've met one manager that would have failed button pushing 101

Say, have you seen the ad on TV touting one quick oil change place (was it
Jiffy Lube?). They have folks that have been 'certified' by an organization
called something like 'oil change specialists of America'.

Seeing these sort of events lately, I'm wondering if others have had similar
experiences. If they have, is there a chance they might see some wisdom in
having some kind of exam before turning someone loose with 1.5 KW of RF and
perhaps thousands of volts in their amp? Yep, I didn't think so either.

As to the ATV, remember the flying spot scanner?


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 7/4/03


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017