| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
July 15th 03, 12:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
How Ugly Can One Creep Be?
|
|
#3
July 15th 03, 09:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
July 15th 03, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , ospam
(Extra class Paratransit Operator Sir Larry Roll) scribbled in a vain attempt at syncophancy: In article , (Steamy Garbageman) writes: Get real. Any astronaut is required to perform many, many tasks as part of their job...and that job is to be space crewfolk first, not "hams." Getting a no-code tech ham license is an easy task for them...do it once and a federal merit badge callsign is theirs to keep for a decade plus two or a shuttle burns up on reentry...whichever comes first. Leonard H Anderson, you are truly one of the most callous, cowardly and unrepetantly ugly people to ever enter USENET or any other public forum. Lennie: That WAS totally uncalled for. Your present and future credibility: ZERO. Poor baby. You don't understand that ALL astronauts have faced that possibility since manned spaceflight began. That is the unfortunate REALITY of present-day manned spaceflight. Well, we know that you can't stand reality. HOW DISGUSTING can one human being be...?!?! Steve: Unfortunately, I think our Lennie has just set a new threshold on "disgusting." Yes, failure to love, cherish, honor and obey morse code is terms for contempt by you, Roll. No problem. If you see a chance to slam a no-coder by standing on the garbage- man's shoulders, go for it! [and you did!] What a piece of work. Truly deserving of every ugly epithet I can think to "laud" you with and more. There hasn't been a prfanity created to adequately "describe" just how cold and disgusting that comment was. None that can be posted here, anyway. Why not? Is the mighty morseman offended by those who do not love, cherish, honor and obey morse code? If thine eye offend thee, cast it out. We don't know that the deaths of the Columbia (or Challenge) crews wasn't long, lingering, and painful. They may have been well conscious long enough to know they were doomed, and had nothing to do to prevent it. Unfortunately, wishing the same on Lennie won't do, either. Lennie has proven himself to be beyond contempt. Don't fall into the same pit he did. Roll, you large bag of fat wind, you've never worked on ANY space project, NEVER shook hands with any astronaut and look them in the eye (I did...John Young is a nice, quiet sort, not very tall...Bob Crippen is taller, more outgoing...both rode the air-drop Enterprize as well as the first STS manned spaceflight). They understood the risks they were taking. By STS 51J the press and public had colored your thinking such that spaceflight was all just a safe, jolly jaunt in space. You've never known anything about manned spaceflight so you project your fantasies as if they were final judgement. You know NOTHING about any high-tech human endeavor. You want very much to "identify" with things you've never participated in, talk about it like you were really "there" but you never were. You've never done any military 24/7 radio communications nor any civilian professional radio communications and you feel "superior" in both morals and ethics over all "no-coders." If you want to be a syncophant to the Garbageman, go right ahead. When anyone wants an ideal role-model for the US Amateur Extra radio amateur, they can always go to you or the Garbageman. :-) LHA |
|
#5
July 16th 03, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , ospam (Extra class Paratransit Operator Sir Larry Roll) scribbled in a vain attempt at syncophancy: In article , (Steamy Garbageman) writes: Get real. Any astronaut is required to perform many, many tasks as part of their job...and that job is to be space crewfolk first, not "hams." Getting a no-code tech ham license is an easy task for them...do it once and a federal merit badge callsign is theirs to keep for a decade plus two or a shuttle burns up on reentry...whichever comes first. Leonard H Anderson, you are truly one of the most callous, cowardly and unrepetantly ugly people to ever enter USENET or any other public forum. Lennie: That WAS totally uncalled for. Your present and future credibility: ZERO. Poor baby. You don't understand that ALL astronauts have faced that possibility since manned spaceflight began. That is the unfortunate REALITY of present-day manned spaceflight. Well, we know that you can't stand reality. THIS is reality: You're the singularly most disgusting scumbag I have ever had the misfortune of "meeting". You're callous, selfish, and most of all one hateful shell of a human being. HOW DISGUSTING can one human being be...?!?! Steve: Unfortunately, I think our Lennie has just set a new threshold on "disgusting." Yes, failure to love, cherish, honor and obey morse code is terms for contempt by you, Roll. No problem. No, Scumbag, don't een TRY to shift this to anything even remorely tied to Amateur Radio, let alone Morse Code. This is about how UGLY and SCURRILOUS one person can get. If you see a chance to slam a no-coder by standing on the garbage- man's shoulders, go for it! [and you did!] What a piece of work. Truly deserving of every ugly epithet I can think to "laud" you with and more. There hasn't been a prfanity created to adequately "describe" just how cold and disgusting that comment was. None that can be posted here, anyway. Why not? Is the mighty morseman offended by those who do not love, cherish, honor and obey morse code? This isn't about Morse Code, Scumbag. It's about the callousness of your "reentry" comments. If thine eye offend thee, cast it out. You shouldn't tempt me, Scumbag. We don't know that the deaths of the Columbia (or Challenge) crews wasn't long, lingering, and painful. They may have been well conscious long enough to know they were doomed, and had nothing to do to prevent it. Unfortunately, wishing the same on Lennie won't do, either. Lennie has proven himself to be beyond contempt. Don't fall into the same pit he did. Roll, you large bag of fat wind, you've never worked on ANY space project, NEVER shook hands with any astronaut and look them in the eye (I did...John Young is a nice, quiet sort, not very tall...Bob Crippen is taller, more outgoing...both rode the air-drop Enterprize as well as the first STS manned spaceflight). I got ya beat by a handful, including one Senator Astronaut. They understood the risks they were taking. By STS 51J the press and public had colored your thinking such that spaceflight was all just a safe, jolly jaunt in space. You've never known anything about manned spaceflight so you project your fantasies as if they were final judgement. You know NOTHING about any high-tech human endeavor. So that allows you to make such heinous comments? You "shook hands" with some astronauts and swept the floors for a couple of space contractors, now you have carte blanche to be sadistic at their expense? You want very much to "identify" with things you've never participated in, talk about it like you were really "there" but you never were. You've never done any military 24/7 radio communications nor any civilian professional radio communications and you feel "superior" in both morals and ethics over all "no-coders." If you want to be a syncophant to the Garbageman, go right ahead. When anyone wants an ideal role-model for the US Amateur Extra radio amateur, they can always go to you or the Garbageman. :-) Nice try, SCUMBAG. This was the event that will bury any chance you ever had of being accepted in ANY Amateur Radio venue. Get your correspondence course shrink wife to explain it to you. Steve Robeson |
|
#6
July 16th 03, 02:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in message . ..
However, the reference to shuttles burning up on reentry was a poor choice of words. You have to understand the liar behind the postings, John. Leonard H Anderson is one of the most prolific, hateful, spite-filled pathological liars to ever darken USENET. That he can even consider, let alone publish, the hateful and just plain mean-spirited trash he just let out and then try to "justify" it in some Morse Code related rhetoric is absoulety shameful. I thought his attempts to embellish his Army "career" record by assosciating himself with Soldiers who died 3 years before he was even sworn in was disgusting. Lennie puts the "scum" in scumbag, that's for sure. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
|
#7
July 16th 03, 03:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#8
July 17th 03, 01:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steamy the Garbage Man) wrote in a fit of distemper: "Distemper"..?!?! That's cute. (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Get real. Any astronaut is required to perform many, many tasks as part of their job...and that job is to be space crewfolk first, not "hams." Getting a no-code tech ham license is an easy task for them...do it once and a federal merit badge callsign is theirs to keep for a decade plus two or a shuttle burns up on reentry...whichever comes first. Leonard H Anderson, you are truly one of the most callous, cowardly and unrepetantly ugly people to ever enter USENET or any other public forum. Gosh, you'd better write AOL post-haste and have me banished! If it would work, I would. I am not as low-down as you, Lennie, and I can bear up far more graciously than you can to examination. HOW DISGUSTING can one human being be...?!?! Now now, quit looking in the mirror when posting, okay? I am not the one who needs to hide behind KIA's or make vile comments about American Astronauts, Scumbag...That's YOUR schtick. What a piece of work. Truly deserving of every ugly epithet I can think to "laud" you with and more. There hasn't been a prfanity created to adequately "describe" just how cold and disgusting that comment was. Go for it, garbageman. Exhaust your entire collection of epithets and cursewords. It may do you good psychologically...you surely aren't getting any professional help on your distemper tantrums. I am not the one who needs them, Lennie. How's your correspondence school trained wife take this...Living with a creep who hides behind skirts and lies? "Scumbag" is an understatment. "Putz" only scratches the top. Oy gevalt! Dey got a shtetl in TN? :-) You try to embellish your own "reputation" on the graves of American KIA's, then you completely disgrace and humilate the graves of seven men and women who, regardless of nationality, died what can only be assumed to have been a horrific death in the pursuit of science Tsk, tsk, tsk. No end to your hatred and disgust, is there? For you? No. It's an embarrasment to me as a Veteran to have creeps like you who can use the Constitution as a cloak for such behaviour. That you can further abuse it to defile the memory of those seven brave souls who died on Columbia is horrific. What an utterly foul, irrelevent and truly puny shadow of a human being you are. When YOUR death comes, I can only hope that, unlike those seven brave souls, that it is long, lingering and painful, and that you remain sufficiently aware of your circumstances to appreciate it all. Creep. There ya go, Dr. Killgore, ER hero and role-model for medical professionals the world over! You MUST learn not to stick your hand in the Sharps box so much. You should take up a nice, restful hobby...maybe stamp collecting. You can always lick stamps whenever you want...you can't lick your newsgroup opponents with curses and wishes for death. Remember that "9 ounces" works both ways...ready on the left? Ready on the right? Ready on the firing line? You have 20 seconds. Now take those meds like a good patient... Nice try...still comes way short of the mark. Your die is cast, Lennie, and it says "LOSER" all over it. Get shrinky-poo to give you an hour of couch time tonight, if she can stand the stench. LHA (L)ying (H)am-baiting (A)ntagonist. Steve Robeson |
|
#9
July 17th 03, 02:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Radio Amateur KC2HMZ
writes: An astronaut/ham's license is renewable for the life of the astronaut/ham. So is any other ham's license. Once a ham becomes a silent key, responsibility for licensing him or her passes to a higher authority (who is a ham and has just bestowed the ultimate license upgrade to the newly deceased - the privileges are unparallelled, but the licensing requirements are rather steep - although no demonstration of Morse proficiency is required, the written test is reputed to be a real killer). However, the reference to shuttles burning up on reentry was a poor choice of words. As to your last sentence, John, you would be right only in discounting certain individuals in here. This thread got started by one who is obsessed with throwing any kind of garbage at myself for the slightest reason...or as manufactured garbage through the use of inference, misdirection, or outright malicious quoting out of context. As one who has been IN the aerospace industry and actually worked ON spaceflight hardware (including man-rated), I'm in the category of ardent fans of the overall effort and certain honor the men and women who have been chosen as astronauts...and cosmonauts. A problem with the ordinary public is that they consider space flight "safe," just like a long plane ride. It is most definitely NOT so. Every single manned flight is a high-risk activity. That it has appeared safe for many successful flights is due largely to thousands of non-astronauts who did the engineering, design, fabrication of the vehicles and payloads. The public is largely ignorant of them...at best only knowing the ones around consoles at the MSFC Mission Control room. Still, each and every space flight is not without risk today. The tragedy of Columbia proved that very unfortunately. Back when Grissom, White, and Chaffee lost their lives in a ground capsule test fire for Apollo, I was working on unmanned space flight payloads...every single one of us in the clean room were saddened on hearing of the event. At that same facility earlier, some of us saw the unedited film of the Gemini-Agena docking flight, the one where a stuck-open manuevering thruster caused a high-rate double degree of freedom rolling. Command pilot Neil Armstrong managed to shut it down, but not before the roll rate had gotten very severe. Armstrong and David Scott could have perished on that flight but managed to manuever just enough to splashdown in the Pacific well away from the intended landing site. Five astronauts and one cosmonaut (Yuri Gagarin) died in aircraft flights. "Ordinary" air flight is supposed to be safe...but it is not without risk. Of the seven who died in Challenger (STS-51J), few know the names of the major crew. Judith Resnick is honored by the IEEE (she was a member) by having her name on an award. It was to be Judy's second mission in space...also commander Scobee and specialist Onizuka. Challenger never reached outer space, exploding a mere 73 seconds after lift-off. Before you get involved in castigating someone, consider carefully who started this thread and the manner in which it was written. Like tens of thousands of others, I honor ALL the names of men and women who have gone in space...even those who have joined the space endeavor knowing full well what their risks are. Leonard H. Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
|
#10
July 17th 03, 05:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
