"Herb" wrote in message
...

"Scott Unit 69" wrote in message
...
The monitoring station in Columbia is still there on the map.

See ADC's Howard County, MD map, page 20, grid squares B1, C1,
B2, C2, D2 and C3 (upper left corner). Shown in gov't gray.

That's an outdated map, over 15 years old. The monitoring
stations were dismantled only seven years ago.

Herb




Then if you are so sure FCC has no more "monitoring" stations, park in front
of the above referenced location and throw a 500 watt dead key. After all,
since
you know so much about the FCC, there is no danger of getting
caught--especially from that
location,......................................... .....................



Right?


J

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...

Poor baby. You don't come close to any civil debate yet you
DEMAND others do so.

He's just following your lead, Len. Perhaps if you set an example of
"civil debate", others would follow. But I doubt you would do that.

I didn't "demand" anything, Lennie.

Yes, you do.

Where?

You have a long history of it, even on the public record
of four years ago at the FCC.

You mean where Steve asked the FCC to disregard your reply comments to
the FCC.
That's what reply comments are for, Len - people either supporting or
opposing the comments of others. You spent over a dozen pages of YOUR
reply comments telling FCC to ignore and disregard the comments of one
Michael P. Deignan. So you have to accept others telling FCC to
disregard your reply comments. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.

I point out that you make it a point of harrassing others about
it, yet indulge yourself in the most childish and pathetic of efforts
to see who can out-insult the other.

Actually you yourself meet "childish and pathetic of efforts" and
cannot stop trying to insult me in posts clearly not including you.

He's just following your example, Len. Perhaps if you set an example
of "adult and reasoned civil debate", others would follow. But I doubt
you would do that.

You insist on referring to yourself as a "professional", but you
have yet to prove yourself "professional" in ANY discipline.

Several corporations, the US government, three state governments
all disagree with you. :-)

Getting paid and being a professional are not the same thing.

You REALLY need some mental therapy on being able to
get along with anyone else.

Uh huh. Coming from you, I rate this about 136 on a scale of 1
to 10 on important things to do.

Psychotics will never admit they are crazy. shrug

Let's remember that phrase, shall we?

Uh huh...(Geeze this idiot makes this easy...) Just like YOU
tried to hide behind "Avery Fine" and "Avery Fineman" until your ego
got the better of you one day and you signed your name to a post that
you had specifically denied BEING you.

The AOL screen name of "Avery Fineman" is still registered to me.

Yeah, we KNOW.

I have, currently, six other screen names at AOL (including this one)
but "Avery Fine" was NOT one of them. Never.

"Avery Fine" was NEVER one of your screen names, you say? That's
simply not true. You posted with that screen name here a few years
back.

Of course you will never admit that you did so, regardless of the
evidence presented.

Yes, I've used the screen name of "Avery Fineman" in here and also
identified myself at the end of the post.

Sometimes you have identified yourself in posts. Other times you have
not.

Let's see - you have used the AOL screen names "nocwtest", "lenof21",
"averyfine", "averyfineman" and "lenover21" in this newsgroup. That's
five. You admit to having seven. For all anyone knows, you could be
"vshah101" and a host of others.....

But you are not me. ;-)

In fact, for all anyone knows, "nocwtest" and "averyfine" could still
be registered to you.

Apparently some in here are terribly uptight and can see no humor in
the pseudonym of "a very fine man" that lacks two spaces. :-) I used
that pseudonym first about 1992 on a Bulletin Board System as
Co-Sysop. "Len Over 21" came from the pseudonym used on the BBS
US Pompeii a year later (run and sysoped by Stan and Zippy Manus in
the Hollywood Hills). It is word play based on the BBS software...takes
too long to explain to anal-retentive control freaks. :-)

Why should anyone care?

The important question is "why does Len need so many different screen
names from the same ISP in order to post to a few newsgroups"?

Perhaps touching your tongue to that B battery fried some
neurons....;-)

I can't "prove" who "Avery Fine" is...but both you and Reverend Jim
are prolific posters from AOL. Coincidence? :-)

It can be proven that "Avery Fine" used to be YOU, even though you
have denied it. Perhaps "Avery Fine" still is you, Len. And YOU are
the most prolific and wordy poster to rrap - AOL or not. Coincidence?
;-) ;-)

Hmmmm...Len uses terms like "psychotic" and "copycat killer syndrome"
to describe other posters, and claims to know the motivations of
others he has never met. ;-)

"Psychotics will never admit they are crazy."

Ayup - you oughta know, Len ;-) ;-) ;-)

Toodles fer now, Len. The bands are alive with the sound of Morse and
there's much to do here before the snow flies.


N2EY (so you know who I am)

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

I didn't "demand" anything, Lennie.

Yes, you do. You have a long history of it, even on the public record
of four years ago at the FCC.

Lennie, please cite the item where I "demand" anything...

I point out that you make it a point of harrassing others about
it, yet indulge yourself in the most childish and pathetic of efforts
to see who can out-insult the other.

Actually you yourself meet "childish and pathetic of efforts" and
cannot stop trying to insult me in posts clearly not including you.

Only when confronted with it, Lennie, since that seems to be the
only mode you are capable in functioning in.

You insist on referring to yourself as a "professional", but you
have yet to prove yourself "professional" in ANY discipline.

Several corporations, the US government, three state governments
all disagree with you.

No doubt you received money for the time you were there, Lennie,
but money does not a professional make...You have yet to demonstrate
ANY characteristics that even remotely "prove" you "professional".

You REALLY need some mental therapy on being able to
get along with anyone else.

Uh huh. Coming from you, I rate this about 136 on a scale of 1
to 10 on important things to do.

Psychotics will never admit they are crazy. shrug

Then we know YOUR problem, don't we.

Uh huh...(Geeze this idiot makes this easy...) Just like YOU
tried to hide behind "Avery Fine" and "Avery Fineman" until your ego
got the better of you one day and you signed your name to a post that
you had specifically denied BEING you.

The AOL screen name of "Avery Fineman" is still registered to me.

I didn't say it wasn't. I said you tried to hide "Lennie" behind
them.

I have, currently, six other screen names at AOL (including this one)
but "Avery Fine" was NOT one of them. Never.

Uh huh.

Yes, I've used the screen name of "Avery Fineman" in here and also
identified myself at the end of the post.

You TRIED to make us think that "Avery Fineman" was someone OTHER
than you at one point. Being unable to rally any number of otherwise
credible posters behind your rants, you manufactured them.

Didn't work. Your ego overdrove your common sense and you got
caught. Sucks to be you.

Apparently some in here are terribly uptight and can see no humor in
the pseudonym of "a very fine man" that lacks two spaces. :-) I used
that pseudonym first about 1992 on a Bulletin Board System as
Co-Sysop. "Len Over 21" came from the pseudonym used on the BBS
US Pompeii a year later (run and sysoped by Stan and Zippy Manus in
the Hollywood Hills). It is word play based on the BBS software...takes
too long to explain to anal-retentive control freaks.

It doesn't take too long to explain anything about you, Lennie.

I can't "prove" who "Avery Fine" is...but both you and Reverend Jim
are prolific posters from AOL. Coincidence?

Might be, but I can honestly state that I am not using any screen
name herein except this one, whether I post directly from AOL or from
Google.

And Jim and I are not the only AOL'ers here. We may never know who
all they are.

Steve, K4YZ