| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#42
August 20th 03, 02:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(DickCarroll) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (DickCarroll) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message om... Some of us have given it real thought, and have posted ideas. But the mantra has always been that eliminating the code test would solve everything. No-code isn't a religion. No Mantra. What??? No "Hoops"??? No "unnecessary requirements"?? No "Unjustified bogus BOHICA thingies"?? No "Morsedits" holding back the intelligentsia?? No "If it wasn't for that dastardly Morris code test I'd take my rightful place on HF?? No mantra. Then the term has no meaning. Much like your posts. No Mantra???? Get back to your village! You miss me? Hammernail = NO MISS Sounds like a big blood blister to me. You *do* often act like one. |
|
#43
August 20th 03, 03:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(DickCarroll) wrote in message om...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (DickCarroll) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (DickCarroll) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message om... Some of us have given it real thought, and have posted ideas. But the mantra has always been that eliminating the code test would solve everything. No-code isn't a religion. No Mantra. What??? No "Hoops"??? No "unnecessary requirements"?? No "Unjustified bogus BOHICA thingies"?? No "Morsedits" holding back the intelligentsia?? No "If it wasn't for that dastardly Morris code test I'd take my rightful place on HF?? No mantra. Then the term has no meaning. Much like your posts. No Mantra???? Get back to your village! You miss me? Hammernail = NO MISS Sounds like a big blood blister to me. You *do* often act like one. You just want me under your thumb. |
|
#44
August 21st 03, 03:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#45
August 21st 03, 12:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(DickCarroll) wrote in message . com...
( Hammernail = NO MISS Sounds like a big blood blister to me. You *do* often act like one. You just want me under your thumb. As always, you're out in left field dangling. *I* don't want you at all, anywhere, under any circumstances. Yet here you are. You're so clueless you'd be dangerous to be around. Yet here you are. You appear to have an unnatural attraction to me. |
|
#46
August 21st 03, 09:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(DickCarroll) wrote in message . com... ( Hammernail = NO MISS Sounds like a big blood blister to me. You *do* often act like one. You just want me under your thumb. As always, you're out in left field dangling. *I* don't want you at all, anywhere, under any circumstances. Yet here you are. You're so clueless you'd be dangerous to be around. Yet here you are. Nooooo, big guy- YOU'RE there. *I'm* here, many hundreds of fortunate miles from 'there'. That's **GOOD!!** You appear to have an unnatural attraction to me. Ignorance does hold a certain fascination. You're a real headshaker! |
|
#47
August 30th 03, 06:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes: In article , writes: In article , (Len Over 21) writes: In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Had the no-code-test Technician never been created, US ham radio would have been short by 200K ham licenses by the time of "Reconstruction." Prove it. Show proof that 200,000 people would not have gotten US amateur radio licenses between February 14, 1991 and April 15, 2000 if the Technician class license had never lost its code test. I don't think you have any proof. Or even any evidence. Just bluster. that was an OLD argument in here and you LOST it. How did I "lose" it, Len? Show us some proof of your assertion. You did. No, I did not. It's all in Google. Then show us. I don't think you can. You just flat-out REFUSED to consider the FCC's own database information (as compiled by a PCTA) and wanted to hide 9 years worth of New Licensees. Where? How? You are simply repeating untruths. That's not rational behavior. Getting all puffed up and antagonistic won't prove any case for you on the morse code test. It won't prove any case for your false interpretation of statistics that was on the AH0A website. The only person I see getting puffed up and antagonistic is you, Len. Nah. Yeah. I'm just poking an old morseman who is blinded to the truth. :-) You're missing the mark by a mile. You would not accept statistics of a noted PCTA taken from the FCC public database then and you refuse to accept it now. What are you talking about? Go back a few years in Google, extract several hundred posts on the subject in there. You do it. You will see it. Show me. Anyone would if they wanted to endlessly rehash past arguments. If anyone can see it, why don't you show us? In 1991, all Technicians were code tested. In 2000, most Technicians were not code tested. 200,000 Technicians who were not code tested in 2000 is somewhere in the ball park. Nobody denies that in 2000 there were a lot of Technicians who had not passed code tests. However, you claimed: "Had the no-code-test Technician never been created, US ham radio would have been short by 200K ham licenses by the time of "Reconstruction."" Reconstruction? Carpet baggers and all. :-) Then go back where you came from. The only way we'd be "short" 200,000 is if none of the 200,000 got licenses. Did your crystal ball tell you that none of them would have learned the code? There's no point in rehashing an old argument where you LOST. Ah, I see. You're using the Big Lie technique, where you simply claim to have "won" without presenting any proof or even any evidence. Did it all years ago. Yes, you used the Big Lie technique before. You refused to believe any of it then, still do. What did I refuse to believe? That there were 200,000 Technicians? That's simply not true. You need your brain washed. It's too full of dits and dahs. Are you a Communist, Len? You speak of brainwashing. You won't make any valid "points" in here by repeating "you're mistaken" and continual refusal to accept FCC database information. I'm not after "points". Just the facts. But you don't have any facts to back up your claims. I did, but trying to present FACTS back then was useless when you refused to accept them. You still refuse to accept such facts. I refuse to accept mistakes. You have presented mistakes, not facts. Not worth the trouble to go back through the past over and over and over again. Then why do you do it? You keep repeating your experiences in Japan, which were way back in the past, over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. You can repeat the same mistakes over and over but they'll still be mistakes, Len. See? There you go once more. You won't accept any truth that is against your viewpoint. You call all of such things "mistakes." :-) Because they are not the truth. N2EY |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FS MOTOROLA RADIO'S | Equipment | |||
| FS MOTOROLA RADIO'S | Equipment | |||
| MOTOROLA RADIOS for Sale! | Equipment | |||
| FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
Linear Mode
