Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 12th 03, 03:40 AM
Hams
 
Posts: n/a
Default BPL & US Hams

http://www1.commsworld.com.au/NASApp...WS &from=home

http://tinyurl.com/jpua

NEWS



HAMS' HIGH TENSION OVER POWERLINE - 12 August 2003
Richard Chirgwin

Stray Signals Spoil Spectrum


Amateur radio operators in America have conducted tests which they say
demonstrate unacceptable radio interference caused by powerline broadband
systems.

The ham radio operators conducted tests in four US states where powerline is in
pilots, and the results of those tests were presented at the group's Austin
Summerfest earlier this month.

The tests demonstrated that powerline broadband systems using frequencies
between 2Mbps and 80Mbps created wide-spectrum interference on HF and low-VHF
amateur radio allocations.

The test was conducted by the laboratory manager of America's ARRL (the American
Radio Relay League), Ed Hare, who tested spectrum measurements in Maryland,
Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York. He is quoted in the ARRL's online
publication as saying that interference “ranged from moderate to extremely
strong”. In some tests, powerline interference was propagating for miles.

The tests found three types of interference: static, pulse noise, and
“warbling”. The interference was detectable both from overhead and from
underground cabling.

The ARRL had already filed technical exhibits to an FCC powerline inquiry, and
says it will file further comments this month.

The ARRL article can be found here.{ Http://arrl.org/ }
CommsWorld Comment:

The first trials of powerline technology during the 1990s were killed off by
interference, and by overhyped vendor claims. When powerline started to make its
comeback, the vendor community put its hand on its collective heart and promised
that interference was solved.

If the ARRL's tests are right – which is a reasonable assumption given the
demanding nature of a ham radio license – then powerline vendors were mistaken
about interference.

This is hardly surprising. The physical parameters of an electricity
distribution network vary much more widely than anything you'll see in a
laboratory. It's quite likely that the interference seen in lab tests was small
enough to convince the industry the technology works. But out in the field,
there's plenty of things to fool around with the line impedance.

This could have been foreseen. If the powerline vendors were wrong about
interference, can we trust their claims about speed, performance, and cost?

It's easy to trivialise the concerns of the ham operators – and that is exactly
the tack utilities are taking in America. But ham operators aren't ignorant; and
they're not without rights. In all countries, ham is licensed – and that means
the operator has paid a fee for the right to use spectrum.

  #2   Report Post  
Old August 12th 03, 11:09 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Hams" wrote in message
...

http://www1.commsworld.com.au/NASApp...=commsworld/ho
me&var_el=art&art_id=1034683529903&var_sect=NEWS&f rom=home

http://tinyurl.com/jpua

NEWS



HAMS' HIGH TENSION OVER POWERLINE - 12 August 2003
Richard Chirgwin

Stray Signals Spoil Spectrum


Amateur radio operators in America have conducted tests which they say
demonstrate unacceptable radio interference caused by powerline broadband
systems.

The ham radio operators conducted tests in four US states where powerline

is in
pilots, and the results of those tests were presented at the group's

Austin
Summerfest earlier this month.

The tests demonstrated that powerline broadband systems using frequencies
between 2Mbps and 80Mbps created wide-spectrum interference on HF and

low-VHF
amateur radio allocations.

The test was conducted by the laboratory manager of America's ARRL (the

American
Radio Relay League), Ed Hare, who tested spectrum measurements in

Maryland,
Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York. He is quoted in the ARRL's online
publication as saying that interference "ranged from moderate to extremely
strong". In some tests, powerline interference was propagating for miles.

The tests found three types of interference: static, pulse noise, and
"warbling". The interference was detectable both from overhead and from
underground cabling.

The ARRL had already filed technical exhibits to an FCC powerline inquiry,

and
says it will file further comments this month.

The ARRL article can be found here.{ Http://arrl.org/ }
CommsWorld Comment:

The first trials of powerline technology during the 1990s were killed off

by
interference, and by overhyped vendor claims. When powerline started to

make its
comeback, the vendor community put its hand on its collective heart and

promised
that interference was solved.

If the ARRL's tests are right - which is a reasonable assumption given the
demanding nature of a ham radio license - then powerline vendors were

mistaken
about interference.

This is hardly surprising. The physical parameters of an electricity
distribution network vary much more widely than anything you'll see in a
laboratory. It's quite likely that the interference seen in lab tests was

small
enough to convince the industry the technology works. But out in the

field,
there's plenty of things to fool around with the line impedance.

This could have been foreseen. If the powerline vendors were wrong about
interference, can we trust their claims about speed, performance, and

cost?

It's easy to trivialise the concerns of the ham operators - and that is

exactly
the tack utilities are taking in America. But ham operators aren't

ignorant; and
they're not without rights. In all countries, ham is licensed - and that

means
the operator has paid a fee for the right to use spectrum.


For anyone that don't believe it yet go to the ARRL web site and download
the 24mb file and see for yourself. It is beyone belief.

Dan/W4NTI


  #3   Report Post  
Old August 14th 03, 12:09 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...
Dan, I did. You are right, it is *unbelievable*. I wonder if the power
companies hired some of the former tobacco spin doctors?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 8/4/03



They must have. I hope the ARRL plays this for the commissioners.

If it goes through you can kiss off HF radio for anything at all. Even if
you live in the boonies, that wont help. It will propagate for miles.

Dan/W4NTI



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For EVERGREEN, COLORADO Hams SecondHandMarklin.com General 0 January 6th 04 04:24 AM
EVERGREEN, COLORADO Hams SecondHandMarklin.com Homebrew 0 January 6th 04 04:23 AM
EVERGREEN, COLORADO HAMS SecondHandMarklin.com Equipment 0 January 6th 04 04:22 AM
EVERGREEN, COLORADO HAMS SecondHandMarklin.com Equipment 0 January 6th 04 04:22 AM
For HAMS in or near EVERGREEN, COLORADO SecondHandMarklin.com Dx 0 January 6th 04 04:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017