Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www1.commsworld.com.au/NASApp...WS &from=home
http://tinyurl.com/jpua NEWS HAMS' HIGH TENSION OVER POWERLINE - 12 August 2003 Richard Chirgwin Stray Signals Spoil Spectrum Amateur radio operators in America have conducted tests which they say demonstrate unacceptable radio interference caused by powerline broadband systems. The ham radio operators conducted tests in four US states where powerline is in pilots, and the results of those tests were presented at the group's Austin Summerfest earlier this month. The tests demonstrated that powerline broadband systems using frequencies between 2Mbps and 80Mbps created wide-spectrum interference on HF and low-VHF amateur radio allocations. The test was conducted by the laboratory manager of America's ARRL (the American Radio Relay League), Ed Hare, who tested spectrum measurements in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York. He is quoted in the ARRL's online publication as saying that interference “ranged from moderate to extremely strong”. In some tests, powerline interference was propagating for miles. The tests found three types of interference: static, pulse noise, and “warbling”. The interference was detectable both from overhead and from underground cabling. The ARRL had already filed technical exhibits to an FCC powerline inquiry, and says it will file further comments this month. The ARRL article can be found here.{ Http://arrl.org/ } CommsWorld Comment: The first trials of powerline technology during the 1990s were killed off by interference, and by overhyped vendor claims. When powerline started to make its comeback, the vendor community put its hand on its collective heart and promised that interference was solved. If the ARRL's tests are right – which is a reasonable assumption given the demanding nature of a ham radio license – then powerline vendors were mistaken about interference. This is hardly surprising. The physical parameters of an electricity distribution network vary much more widely than anything you'll see in a laboratory. It's quite likely that the interference seen in lab tests was small enough to convince the industry the technology works. But out in the field, there's plenty of things to fool around with the line impedance. This could have been foreseen. If the powerline vendors were wrong about interference, can we trust their claims about speed, performance, and cost? It's easy to trivialise the concerns of the ham operators – and that is exactly the tack utilities are taking in America. But ham operators aren't ignorant; and they're not without rights. In all countries, ham is licensed – and that means the operator has paid a fee for the right to use spectrum. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hams" wrote in message ... http://www1.commsworld.com.au/NASApp...=commsworld/ho me&var_el=art&art_id=1034683529903&var_sect=NEWS&f rom=home http://tinyurl.com/jpua NEWS HAMS' HIGH TENSION OVER POWERLINE - 12 August 2003 Richard Chirgwin Stray Signals Spoil Spectrum Amateur radio operators in America have conducted tests which they say demonstrate unacceptable radio interference caused by powerline broadband systems. The ham radio operators conducted tests in four US states where powerline is in pilots, and the results of those tests were presented at the group's Austin Summerfest earlier this month. The tests demonstrated that powerline broadband systems using frequencies between 2Mbps and 80Mbps created wide-spectrum interference on HF and low-VHF amateur radio allocations. The test was conducted by the laboratory manager of America's ARRL (the American Radio Relay League), Ed Hare, who tested spectrum measurements in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York. He is quoted in the ARRL's online publication as saying that interference "ranged from moderate to extremely strong". In some tests, powerline interference was propagating for miles. The tests found three types of interference: static, pulse noise, and "warbling". The interference was detectable both from overhead and from underground cabling. The ARRL had already filed technical exhibits to an FCC powerline inquiry, and says it will file further comments this month. The ARRL article can be found here.{ Http://arrl.org/ } CommsWorld Comment: The first trials of powerline technology during the 1990s were killed off by interference, and by overhyped vendor claims. When powerline started to make its comeback, the vendor community put its hand on its collective heart and promised that interference was solved. If the ARRL's tests are right - which is a reasonable assumption given the demanding nature of a ham radio license - then powerline vendors were mistaken about interference. This is hardly surprising. The physical parameters of an electricity distribution network vary much more widely than anything you'll see in a laboratory. It's quite likely that the interference seen in lab tests was small enough to convince the industry the technology works. But out in the field, there's plenty of things to fool around with the line impedance. This could have been foreseen. If the powerline vendors were wrong about interference, can we trust their claims about speed, performance, and cost? It's easy to trivialise the concerns of the ham operators - and that is exactly the tack utilities are taking in America. But ham operators aren't ignorant; and they're not without rights. In all countries, ham is licensed - and that means the operator has paid a fee for the right to use spectrum. For anyone that don't believe it yet go to the ARRL web site and download the 24mb file and see for yourself. It is beyone belief. Dan/W4NTI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Dan, I did. You are right, it is *unbelievable*. I wonder if the power companies hired some of the former tobacco spin doctors? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 8/4/03 They must have. I hope the ARRL plays this for the commissioners. If it goes through you can kiss off HF radio for anything at all. Even if you live in the boonies, that wont help. It will propagate for miles. Dan/W4NTI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For EVERGREEN, COLORADO Hams | General | |||
EVERGREEN, COLORADO Hams | Homebrew | |||
EVERGREEN, COLORADO HAMS | Equipment | |||
EVERGREEN, COLORADO HAMS | Equipment | |||
For HAMS in or near EVERGREEN, COLORADO | Dx |