(DickCarroll) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message om...
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Hans K0HB wrote:
"Len Over 21" wrote


If you are not a registered voter in California, then you have no cause to
carry on as if you were nor have you any authority whatsoever on
California politics.



That sword cuts in both directions, sir.

If you are not a registered voter in California (licensed operator
in the Amateur Radio Service), then you have no cause to carry on
as if you were nor have you any authority whatsoever on California
politics (Amateur Radio Service policy).


Game, Set, Match!


Squelch of the week.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike, you almost got it. Len -was- using the back of the blade.
Maybe if he had used the flat side...

Brian, as usual you didn't quite get it. Len just got the blade stuffed up his nose.

DICK, you almost got it. Len -was- using the back of the blade. Maybe
if he had used the flat side... and slapped you with it.

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , Dwight Stewart

Don't hold your breath. Political discussions are
almost a tradition in this newsgroup, and your rants (about the "bigotry of
easterners" and so on) certainly isn't going to change that.

Okay, you must be establishing that this is NOT an amateur radio
policy discussion venue, right?

What's been established is that you seem to have a double dose of
the "Do What I Say, Not Do What I Do" syndrome this week.

You have posted legions of absolutely NON Amateur Radio related
bilge yet seem to try and force others to not do so...

YOU want it to be all about politics, anywhere and everywhere?

And you don't?

There are hundreds of Chat Rooms and other forums for discussion of
everything that is NOT about amateur radio. Go there.

Go yourself, Lennie. You're NOT an licensed Amateur Radio
operator, have no stake in Amateur Radio, and have absolutely refused
to do anything constructive FOR Amateur radio.

Now, next time you allege that Dave Heil is "barking orders" at
you, don't be surprised if the UPS man at your door delivers a swift
puch in the nose instead. That's what's in style for the two-faced
this season.

Steve, K4YZ

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

Who cares? YOU are the one who is always suggesting OTHERS are
trying to be "moderators", yet here YOU are demanding that someone
change the subject.

The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.

Again I ask....WHO CARES???

You have absolutely NO RIGHT to suggest that anyone take ANY
discussion to ANY other forum for ANY reason.

YOU have violated that very same "it's not Amateur Radio" clause
so many times it's pathetic...And you're the only one who can't see
how hillarious it is to see YOU suggesting others do so!

Like it or not (you definitely hate it), I DID do it and the proof is in
over
two years' worth of monthly editions on the masthead beside the table
of contents.

You have no comparative claim.

Let's see....How many magazines have gone toes-up while I was
an "associate editor"....

Hmmmmm....NONE!

And I served not one but THREE tours in Japan and surrounding
environs,,,Not one, such as yourself.

Granted, I had to work a bit harder than yourself...Can't imagine
too many times that rear-area message clerks have to venture out of
the air conditioning...

I was, and continue to be an electronics design engineer both as
professional (paid) and amateur (unpaid).

But still not a licensed Amateur Radio Operator. The rest, since
by YOUR rules is NOT relevent to Amateur Radio, is moot and should be
taken to another forum.

Not by "my" rules.

The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.

Why do you keep insisting it is?

I didn't say it was. I say you are an idiot for trying to insist
that others discuss non-Amateur topics elsewhere when YOU so
prolifically QRM this newsgroups with your own non-Amateur bilge all
the time.

For the purposes of THIS forum you have yet to do anything except
rant, antagonize and demean those who HAVE "DONE it"...

Tsk, tsk, tsk...you are still looking in a mirror when you say that.

I'll ask you to prove it, but then will also heap it on the pile
of unanswered LennieRants.

No FCC Form 660 = No Amateur Radio.

This newsgroup is not restricted solely to those who have amateur
radio licenses. It is unmoderated.

If you feel so terribly wronged, you must go to AOL management and
demand that I be barred from accessing an open newsgroup.

It's not about your "access". It's about YOUR penchant for going
off on long non-Amateur related threads then trying to "moderate"
someone else into not doing the same.

You are two faced. Most pathological liars are.

Remember your short 3-day life of LIBEL about another.

It ain't "libel" if it's true.

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

The RRAP back channel folks can ask me if they care to, and I'll
tell them, but you're not invited. You won't play nice in e mail
anyway.

I sent you several copes of some of my proof. You refused to accept
it, claiming those same "not nice" comments.

As previously stated, you made the mistake of spamming several
folks with the same "mistake", all-the-while claiming to be an
"electronics" expert.

You lied.

You haven't named a single one of the "hostile actions" you claim you
were in.

Because it's irrelevent to this forum. I already invited sonme
to e mail me direct. Brian took me up on some of it.

Radio communications is still radio communications. You didn't do any
in the military, therefore you can only tell stories about it. Your
unproven claims are just fish stories.

No doubt that fishy smell is Mrs. Lennie.

Rest of rant deleted.

You are a liar. You ae unlicensed. You have NO experience from
which to make informed opinions on Amateur Radio related matters.

Now...take Mrs Lennie to the doctor and get that fishy smell
fixed.

Steve, K4YZ

And once again yet another LennieRant is laid to wast by someone who
"was there", who lived it and knows better than the NewsgroupNasty
himself.

"...and the TRUTH shall set you free!"

Watching him try to squirm out of THIS one will be fun!

Steve, K4YZ

"K0HB Master Chief Radioman US Navy" wrote in message news:ac8d9525929c326f3c74e6d3ae139ad5.128005@myga te.mailgate.org...
"Len Over 21" wrote


Fifty years ago the US military wasn't using morse code modes for
long-distance primary communications on HF radio.


"Fifty years ago" would be the summer of 1953.

In 1960...

... the US Navy was using morse code on HF for the fleet "Fox" broadcast
to all ships at sea 24/7/365.
... the US Navy was using morse code on HF Ship/Shore circuits from all
ships below the size of CA (Heavy Cruiser).
... the US Navy was using morse code on HF for Task Force and Task Group
Commander traffic nets for all forward deployed battle groups.

In 1965...

... the US Navy was using morse code on HF for Ship/Shore circuits from
all ships below the size of DL (Destroyer Leader)
... the US Navy was using morse code on HF for airborne TACAMO
communications to deployed attack submarines
... the US Navy was using morse code on ELF/VLF for communications to
deployed nuclear submarines

In 1970...

... the US Navy still kept morse code circuits active on HF as fallback
for afloat units which might lose their Orestes covered ship shore
capability.

I could go on and on with other examples more recent that fifty years
ago, but I think you get the picture....

....your research on this matter is dismally flawed.

Good luck on this one now.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB

Brian wrote:
(DickCarroll) wrote in message . com...

(Brian) wrote in message om...

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

Hans K0HB wrote:

"Len Over 21" wrote



If you are not a registered voter in California, then you have no cause to
carry on as if you were nor have you any authority whatsoever on
California politics.



That sword cuts in both directions, sir.

If you are not a registered voter in California (licensed operator
in the Amateur Radio Service), then you have no cause to carry on
as if you were nor have you any authority whatsoever on California
politics (Amateur Radio Service policy).


Game, Set, Match!


Squelch of the week.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike, you almost got it. Len -was- using the back of the blade.
Maybe if he had used the flat side...

Brian, as usual you didn't quite get it. Len just got the blade stuffed up his nose.


DICK, you almost got it. Len -was- using the back of the blade. Maybe
if he had used the flat side... and slapped you with it.

Lessee, he told me to take the post out of here, and that it was noe of
my business because I'm not a registered voter in California.


Let us say that is a valid argument.

So Hans simply substitutes the related words, turning it into what I
consider a perfect squelch.

Was Hans not relevent?

It's a good squelch, unless you subscribe to the dictum that that other
guy wins, always.

And certainly, I only refer to squelching in the normal sense. Some
people are not accepting of squelchification, as it were.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Brian wrote:
(DickCarroll) wrote in message . com...

(Brian) wrote in message om...

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

Hans K0HB wrote:

"Len Over 21" wrote



If you are not a registered voter in California, then you have no cause to
carry on as if you were nor have you any authority whatsoever on
California politics.



That sword cuts in both directions, sir.

If you are not a registered voter in California (licensed operator
in the Amateur Radio Service), then you have no cause to carry on
as if you were nor have you any authority whatsoever on California
politics (Amateur Radio Service policy).


Game, Set, Match!


Squelch of the week.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike, you almost got it. Len -was- using the back of the blade.
Maybe if he had used the flat side...

Brian, as usual you didn't quite get it. Len just got the blade stuffed up his nose.


DICK, you almost got it. Len -was- using the back of the blade. Maybe
if he had used the flat side... and slapped you with it.

Lessee, he told me to take the post out of here, and that it was noe of
my business because I'm not a registered voter in California.


Let us say that is a valid argument.

Let's not because everyone is entitled to their own opinion and
they're entitled to voice it per the articles of the US Constitution.

However, what Len has heard from the rrap peanut gallery is that he
doesn't have a ham license, therefore his opinions are wrong and/or
don't count.

He's playing a little TIT for TAT in his California Voting analogue.

It's really not so hard to see that.

So Hans simply substitutes the related words, turning it into what I
consider a perfect squelch.

Was Hans not relevent?

Hans is ocassionally relevant, but not on this ocassion. He's much
better at playing a Master Chief.

It's a good squelch, unless you subscribe to the dictum that that other
guy wins, always.

Not at all. Len was just giving a little of it back. Are you not big
enough to accept it?

And certainly, I only refer to squelching in the normal sense. Some
people are not accepting of squelchification, as it were.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Squelchification of free speech is now a good thing?

bb

Brian wrote:


Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

It's a good squelch, unless you subscribe to the dictum that that other
guy wins, always.


Not at all. Len was just giving a little of it back. Are you not big
enough to accept it?

Problem is, Brian, that beyond an inquiry as to what his interest was
in ham radio, I never said his opinions don't count. That's someone
elses argument. I'm quite neutral on what he posts. Post or don't, no
problem.

That's painting with a very broad brush.


Squelchification of free speech is now a good thing?

Being squelched is not denial of free speech. The choice to respond
after being squelched is always there.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Brian wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

It's a good squelch, unless you subscribe to the dictum that that other
guy wins, always.

Not at all. Len was just giving a little of it back. Are you not big
enough to accept it?

Problem is, Brian, that beyond an inquiry as to what his interest was
in ham radio, I never said his opinions don't count.

Others have repeatedly.

That's someone
elses argument. I'm quite neutral on what he posts. Post or don't, no
problem.

That's painting with a very broad brush.

It helps to use a broad brush when you want to cover a large area.

Squelchification of free speech is now a good thing?

Being squelched is not denial of free speech. The choice to respond
after being squelched is always there.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Unless the squelchers "moderate" the newsgroup as they've brought up before.