Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 24th 03, 08:32 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...

This newsgroup is about AMATEUR RADIO POLICY.


Dwight, Lennie makes this assertion when it becomes obvious that
he's been bested, especially by someone he considers below his social
station.


The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.

Lennie will rant on and on about Japan, his days as an "enginer",
and his stellar career as a "contributing editor" of a magazine that
wwent belly-up.


Please use a spellchecker when you become so enraged.

I was an Associate Editor at HAM RADIO magazine, so listed on
the "masthead" (listing of staff) every month for two years. HAM
RADIO magazine was an independent technically-oriented monthly
that was published for TWENTY-TWO YEARS. It got started and
survived in competition with QST, CQ, and 73 for over two decades.

There can be no "blame" attributed to the content of HAM RADIO
magazine. It was always superior technically to all the others. The
fault may lie in the dwindling readership of radio amateurs no longer
caring about technical matters or home workshop projects sufficient
to attract advertisers and advertising revenue.

HR, CQ, 73 never had the financial backup of a membership
organization to keep them afloat when advertising revenue was hard
to get. QST survives only because it is basically a membership
magazine with the (~12 million) resources of ARRL behind it. The
three independents succeeded and stayed in business despite not
having such guarantees of demographics to attract advertisers.

I was, and continue to be an electronics design engineer both as
professional (paid) and amateur (unpaid).

The fact of the matter is that I've DONE IT, have the documentation
and enough witnesses to convince any court except the vigilantee
groups who only want to destroy others while spewing forth hate and
vomit on those who've done things.


And what give YOU the right, Mr. Anderscum, to demand that Dwight
make the content conform to YOUR specifications?

You, you lying sack of buffalo excrement, are the one who is
constantly calling Dave Heil and Larry Roll all sorts of names for
allegedly doing the same thing, yet here YOU are VERY obviously NOT
living up to your own rhetoric...


"Buffalo excrement?!?" :-)

As they say in Silicon Valley, let the "chips" fall where they may...

LHA
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 26th 03, 05:08 PM
Steve Robeson, K4CAP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...

This newsgroup is about AMATEUR RADIO POLICY.


Dwight, Lennie makes this assertion when it becomes obvious that
he's been bested, especially by someone he considers below his social
station.


The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.


Who cares? YOU are the one who is always suggesting OTHERS are
trying to be "moderators", yet here YOU are demanding that someone
change the subject.

Go figure.

Lennie will rant on and on about Japan, his days as an "enginer",
and his stellar career as a "contributing editor" of a magazine that
wwent belly-up.


Please use a spellchecker when you become so enraged.


And demanding even more.

I was an Associate Editor at HAM RADIO magazine...(SNIP)


Yeahyeahyeah...Same old song.

I was, and continue to be an electronics design engineer both as
professional (paid) and amateur (unpaid).


But still not a licensed Amateur Radio Operator. The rest, since
by YOUR rules is NOT relevent to Amateur Radio, is moot and should be
taken to another forum.

The fact of the matter is that I've DONE IT, have the documentation
and enough witnesses to convince any court except the vigilantee
groups who only want to destroy others while spewing forth hate and
vomit on those who've done things.


For the purposes of THIS forum you have yet to do anything except
rant, antagonize and demean those who HAVE "DONE it"...

No FCC Form 660 = No Amateur Radio.

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 27th 03, 03:34 AM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...

This newsgroup is about AMATEUR RADIO POLICY.

Dwight, Lennie makes this assertion when it becomes obvious that
he's been bested, especially by someone he considers below his social
station.


The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.


Who cares? YOU are the one who is always suggesting OTHERS are
trying to be "moderators", yet here YOU are demanding that someone
change the subject.


The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.


Lennie will rant on and on about Japan, his days as an "enginer",
and his stellar career as a "contributing editor" of a magazine that
wwent belly-up.


Please use a spellchecker when you become so enraged.


And demanding even more.

I was an Associate Editor at HAM RADIO magazine...(SNIP)


Yeahyeahyeah...Same old song.


Like it or not (you definitely hate it), I DID do it and the proof is in
over
two years' worth of monthly editions on the masthead beside the table
of contents.

You have no comparative claim.


I was, and continue to be an electronics design engineer both as
professional (paid) and amateur (unpaid).


But still not a licensed Amateur Radio Operator. The rest, since
by YOUR rules is NOT relevent to Amateur Radio, is moot and should be
taken to another forum.


Not by "my" rules.

The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.

Why do you keep insisting it is?


For the purposes of THIS forum you have yet to do anything except
rant, antagonize and demean those who HAVE "DONE it"...


Tsk, tsk, tsk...you are still looking in a mirror when you say that.

When there are undocumented unproven claims made, they get
commented on for the undocumented unproven claims they are.
Fish stories. Imaginings. Boastful never-was stories. LIES.


No FCC Form 660 = No Amateur Radio.


This newsgroup is not restricted solely to those who have amateur
radio licenses. It is unmoderated.

If you feel so terribly wronged, you must go to AOL management and
demand that I be barred from accessing an open newsgroup.

Good luck on such demands.

Remember your short 3-day life of LIBEL about another.

LHA


  #4   Report Post  
Old August 27th 03, 02:55 PM
Steve Robeson, K4CAP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:


Who cares? YOU are the one who is always suggesting OTHERS are
trying to be "moderators", yet here YOU are demanding that someone
change the subject.


The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.


Again I ask....WHO CARES???

You have absolutely NO RIGHT to suggest that anyone take ANY
discussion to ANY other forum for ANY reason.

YOU have violated that very same "it's not Amateur Radio" clause
so many times it's pathetic...And you're the only one who can't see
how hillarious it is to see YOU suggesting others do so!

Like it or not (you definitely hate it), I DID do it and the proof is in
over
two years' worth of monthly editions on the masthead beside the table
of contents.

You have no comparative claim.


Let's see....How many magazines have gone toes-up while I was
an "associate editor"....

Hmmmmm....NONE!

And I served not one but THREE tours in Japan and surrounding
environs,,,Not one, such as yourself.

Granted, I had to work a bit harder than yourself...Can't imagine
too many times that rear-area message clerks have to venture out of
the air conditioning...

I was, and continue to be an electronics design engineer both as
professional (paid) and amateur (unpaid).


But still not a licensed Amateur Radio Operator. The rest, since
by YOUR rules is NOT relevent to Amateur Radio, is moot and should be
taken to another forum.


Not by "my" rules.

The special recall election in California is NOT about amateur radio.

Why do you keep insisting it is?


I didn't say it was. I say you are an idiot for trying to insist
that others discuss non-Amateur topics elsewhere when YOU so
prolifically QRM this newsgroups with your own non-Amateur bilge all
the time.

For the purposes of THIS forum you have yet to do anything except
rant, antagonize and demean those who HAVE "DONE it"...


Tsk, tsk, tsk...you are still looking in a mirror when you say that.


I'll ask you to prove it, but then will also heap it on the pile
of unanswered LennieRants.

No FCC Form 660 = No Amateur Radio.


This newsgroup is not restricted solely to those who have amateur
radio licenses. It is unmoderated.

If you feel so terribly wronged, you must go to AOL management and
demand that I be barred from accessing an open newsgroup.


It's not about your "access". It's about YOUR penchant for going
off on long non-Amateur related threads then trying to "moderate"
someone else into not doing the same.

You are two faced. Most pathological liars are.

Remember your short 3-day life of LIBEL about another.


It ain't "libel" if it's true.

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reflections on rrap Ryan, KC8PMX Antenna 0 September 24th 03 06:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017