Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
garigue wrote:
code, fine, if they want to fine, just don't come up to me and bitch and moan that 5 WPM is a hurdle or mountain too high to climb. not to worry, it won't be a hurdle or a mountain anymore when the FCC removes the code testing requirement. Clint KB5ZHT Hello there Clint ..... I agree it will all be a rather moot point but it will be the drip off the leaf that eventually runs into the sea of a no test amateur radio license. The future ham will just access the FCC site and type in the info and hit print. I am not a betting man but Clint I will send you a six pack of Iron City beer if testing doesn't turn into a 5 WPM like sham or isn't completely eliminated in 10-15 years. Here's another possibility, Tom. At some point in the near future, we will *buy* our licenses from Clear Channel! - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 | Policy | |||
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
Sign in the petition against the abuse of the Band Plan forward this message to your buddies) | Dx | |||
My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition | Policy |