Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() WD2XEQ AMBIENT CORPORATION 0118-EX-PL-2003 New experimental to operate in 1.7-88 MHz for testing power line carrier systems. Fixed: States of NY and MA http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-238762A1.pdf -- Best Regards, Keith AOL IM:kilowattradio NW Oregon Radio http://kilowatt-radio.org/ _Give SCO $699 for using Linux or the Penguin gets it._ Torvalds: _They are smoking crack._ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "WA8ULX" wrote in message ... WD2XEQ AMBIENT CORPORATION 0118-EX-PL-2003 New experimental to operate in 1.7-88 MHz for testing power line carrier systems. Fixed: States of NY and MA Its about time. Might as well, NCI and the ARRL are working on giving licenses to the retarded masses anyway. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Might as well, NCI and the ARRL are working on giving licenses to the
retarded masses anyway. Thats my point, let the Knuckle Draggers have HF, then they can compete with BPL. I mean lets face it, NCI and the other Morrons claim that all the Tech whizzards are just waiting to get into Ham Radio, so let them deal with BPL. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "shephed" wrote in message ... "WA8ULX" wrote in message ... WD2XEQ AMBIENT CORPORATION 0118-EX-PL-2003 New experimental to operate in 1.7-88 MHz for testing power line carrier systems. Fixed: States of NY and MA Its about time. Might as well, NCI and the ARRL are working on giving licenses to the retarded masses anyway. Sorry, but you got it the wrong way around. 'Old' Class A-amateurs (HF) don't even know what BPL is. They are (in your terms) the 'retarded masses'. Modern Class 'B' amateurs (technically very proficient) know what BPL is and that also the 30 MHz bands are to be protected. Not that I am not interested in HF though! All amateur bands need to be protected. Stating that BPL does not matter anymore because no-coders are allowed to operate on HF as well, means that you don't care about radio amateurism. Otherwise, you'd better fight hard to keep no-coders of the HF-bands instead of complaining about them when they do enter the HF-bands. If you really feel that the HF bands are 'lost' because of no-coders entering them, please give up your HF-licence and move on to another hobby. You lost your perspective on radio amateurism. 73 de Rene PE1RA / ON6ALD |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |