Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 12th 03, 01:30 AM
Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default BPL: 1st Experimental License Issued



WD2XEQ AMBIENT CORPORATION 0118-EX-PL-2003

New experimental to operate in 1.7-88 MHz for testing power line carrier
systems. Fixed: States of NY and MA

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-238762A1.pdf

--
Best Regards, Keith AOL IM:kilowattradio
NW Oregon Radio http://kilowatt-radio.org/
_Give SCO $699 for using Linux or the Penguin gets it._
Torvalds: _They are smoking crack._
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 12th 03, 03:58 AM
shephed
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
WD2XEQ AMBIENT CORPORATION 0118-EX-PL-2003

New experimental to operate in 1.7-88 MHz for testing power line carrier
systems. Fixed: States of NY and MA


Its about time.


Might as well, NCI and the ARRL are working on giving licenses to the
retarded masses anyway.


  #3   Report Post  
Old September 12th 03, 05:20 AM
WA8ULX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Might as well, NCI and the ARRL are working on giving licenses to the
retarded masses anyway.


Thats my point, let the Knuckle Draggers have HF, then they can compete with
BPL. I mean lets face it, NCI and the other Morrons claim that all the Tech
whizzards are just waiting to get into Ham Radio, so let them deal with BPL.
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 24th 03, 09:47 AM
Rene PE1RA / ON6ALD
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"shephed" wrote in message
...

"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
WD2XEQ AMBIENT CORPORATION 0118-EX-PL-2003

New experimental to operate in 1.7-88 MHz for testing power line

carrier
systems. Fixed: States of NY and MA


Its about time.


Might as well, NCI and the ARRL are working on giving licenses to the
retarded masses anyway.


Sorry, but you got it the wrong way around. 'Old' Class A-amateurs (HF)
don't even know what BPL is. They are (in your terms) the 'retarded masses'.
Modern Class 'B' amateurs (technically very proficient) know what BPL is and
that also the 30 MHz bands are to be protected.

Not that I am not interested in HF though! All amateur bands need to be
protected.

Stating that BPL does not matter anymore because no-coders are allowed to
operate on HF as well, means that you don't care about radio amateurism.
Otherwise, you'd better fight hard to keep no-coders of the HF-bands instead
of complaining about them when they do enter the HF-bands.

If you really feel that the HF bands are 'lost' because of no-coders
entering them, please give up your HF-licence and move on to another hobby.
You lost your perspective on radio amateurism.

73 de Rene PE1RA / ON6ALD


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 02:37 AM
Low reenlistment rate charlesb Policy 54 September 18th 03 02:57 PM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 01:25 AM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st Dwight Stewart Policy 300 August 12th 03 01:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 03:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017