Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes: I'd wager that if you put all us in a room, we'd get along just fine. - Mike KB3EIA - You and me? Sure. Jim/N2EY and I? Sure. Brian and I? Sure. Here's who I wouldn't even consider being in the same room with: Larry Roll, Dick Carroll, Dan/W4whatever, Dave Heil, Waddles (Waddles is non-existent in my book), and that's just a few. I have no desire to "get along" with people like that. Kim W5TIT Kim: Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a person's online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate forum such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not wish to meet with you. I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that given the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said in this forum. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
... In article , "Kim W5TIT" writes: I'd wager that if you put all us in a room, we'd get along just fine. - Mike KB3EIA - You and me? Sure. Jim/N2EY and I? Sure. Brian and I? Sure. Here's who I wouldn't even consider being in the same room with: Larry Roll, Dick Carroll, Dan/W4whatever, Dave Heil, Waddles (Waddles is non-existent in my book), and that's just a few. I have no desire to "get along" with people like that. Kim W5TIT Kim: Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a person's online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate forum such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not wish to meet with you. And, I would be upset....because? I don't get on a forum in a newsgroup with the intention of meeting and greeting. Your excuses for your behavior that this is "just a newsgroup" are weak and shrill at best. I think those of us who probably would meet in real life are those who have been frank and honest about who we are, up front and without using the guise of a newsgroup to act in a manner inconsistent with who we are as people. THOSE are the people who would end up meeting and not having to waste time muddling through who we are and who we ain't, Larry. I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that given the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said in this forum. 73 de Larry, K3LT I am not in least bit curious about the majority of people in this newsgroup. Most of all, those mentioned above. Kim W5TIT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a
person's online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate forum such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not wish to meet with you. All we are here is merely a typeset or font! Until I either talk to the person in person, on the phone or over the air, all of these people here are merely fictional characters in my book. No way to really prove it is even them posting for that matter, and I take most negative comments with a grain of salt in that matter. To me it is purely entertainment, with the rare, occasional educational value to it. I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that given the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said in this forum. I would agree as well, because after sitting down and actually chatting with all of these people, we might actually find out that some of these people are not really as bad as we think. At least we then could say we actually "have gotten to know" each other and not just see them for the way in which they communicate here, which may not necessarily be the way they are in person. Can you imagine that even Brucie might actually be a decent person in real life? Hell, anything is possible. I had another idea, of which I thought would be cool..... Since we all need to practice on message handling/sending, I think it would be cool to get some type of message traffic going with RRAP people as the participants. The only problem I have is, with sending message traffic, everything I have learned from "old school" hams is that you MUST have a phone number included with the message traffic. I personally do not wish to have my number go through the system which now is a cellphone number, as opposed to a landline number. Am I wrong in my information that within a messagegram that you MUST include a phone number???? If I am not wrong, anyone feel like sharing traffic ?? Send your interest and contact info that you wish to use to my email address of kc8pmxNO JUNK OR (remove the NO JUNK OR SPAM to reply.) I definitely can always use the practice, and what the hell, it might actually be fun! -- Ryan, KC8PMX FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!) --. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-. ... --. .... - . .-. ... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ...
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message ... In article , "Kim W5TIT" writes: I'd wager that if you put all us in a room, we'd get along just fine. - Mike KB3EIA - You and me? Sure. Jim/N2EY and I? Sure. Brian and I? Sure. Here's who I wouldn't even consider being in the same room with: Larry Roll, Dick Carroll, Dan/W4whatever, Dave Heil, Waddles (Waddles is non-existent in my book), and that's just a few. I have no desire to "get along" with people like that. Kim W5TIT Kim: Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a person's online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate forum such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not wish to meet with you. And, I would be upset....because? I don't get on a forum in a newsgroup with the intention of meeting and greeting. Your excuses for your behavior that this is "just a newsgroup" are weak and shrill at best. I think those of us who probably would meet in real life are those who have been frank and honest about who we are, up front and without using the guise of a newsgroup to act in a manner inconsistent with who we are as people. THOSE are the people who would end up meeting and not having to waste time muddling through who we are and who we ain't, Larry. I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that given the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said in this forum. 73 de Larry, K3LT I am not in least bit curious about the majority of people in this newsgroup. Most of all, those mentioned above. Kim W5TIT Kim, get the OM a shiney new pair of HD brass-riveted jeans and yourself a shiney new HD steel-belted brittany spear brazier, and join us at Dayton 04. I promise I won't make any Texas jokes til you'se guys show up. By the way, do you know how they separate the men from the boys in Texas... Brain, (more or less.) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message om... (Brian) wrote in message . com... Kim, get the OM a shiney new pair of HD brass-riveted jeans and yourself a shiney new HD steel-belted brittany spear brazier, and join us at Dayton 04. What was it you were suggesting to Mike Coslo about being rude, Brain? I promise I won't make any Texas jokes til you'se guys show up. A promie from you is like pre-election fodder.... By the way, do you know how they separate the men from the boys in Texas... Brain, (more or less.) Then I dare say you'd best not go to Texas...You've been seperated from your brain for a long time. Steve, K4YZ It was my attempt to get Kim to lighten up a little. But you don't know how to do that - always on the job as the RRAP Avenging Angel, I see. No, Brain, it was YOUR "Avenging Angel" personna that was at work. When YOU do something like that it's "levity"...trying to get someone to "lighten up". When I say something similar you whip out this new "Avenging Angel" spin in order to try and disguise your own conduct. I say it's yet one more example of following in the footsteps of Lennie the Liar..."Don't So As I Do...Do As I Say"... Bascially, I just think you're two-faced. Steve, K4YZ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message om... (Brian) wrote in message . com... Kim, get the OM a shiney new pair of HD brass-riveted jeans and yourself a shiney new HD steel-belted brittany spear brazier, and join us at Dayton 04. What was it you were suggesting to Mike Coslo about being rude, Brain? I promise I won't make any Texas jokes til you'se guys show up. A promie from you is like pre-election fodder.... By the way, do you know how they separate the men from the boys in Texas... Brain, (more or less.) Then I dare say you'd best not go to Texas...You've been seperated from your brain for a long time. Steve, K4YZ It was my attempt to get Kim to lighten up a little. But you don't know how to do that - always on the job as the RRAP Avenging Angel, I see. No, Brain, it was YOUR "Avenging Angel" personna that was at work. When YOU do something like that it's "levity"...trying to get someone to "lighten up". When I say something similar you whip out this new "Avenging Angel" spin in order to try and disguise your own conduct. If I've offended Kim, I'm sorry. I say it's yet one more example of following in the footsteps of Lennie the Liar..."Don't So As I Do...Do As I Say"... Bascially, I just think you're two-faced. Steve, K4YZ No, Steve, not true. I have the capacity to say I was wrong an apologize. I leave the Avenging Angel stuff to you. You do what you're best at - trying to destroy anyone who might disagree with you. Sayonara. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... No, Brain, it was YOUR "Avenging Angel" personna that was at work. When YOU do something like that it's "levity"...trying to get someone to "lighten up". When I say something similar you whip out this new "Avenging Angel" spin in order to try and disguise your own conduct. If I've offended Kim, I'm sorry. You offend more than Kim, Brain. You offend yourself, but you are too self-centered to se it. I say it's yet one more example of following in the footsteps of Lennie the Liar..."Don't So As I Do...Do As I Say"... Bascially, I just think you're two-faced. Steve, K4YZ No, Steve, not true. I have the capacity to say I was wrong an apologize. Being able to "apologize" is worthy, Brian. Being able to not offend in the first place is even better. I leave the Avenging Angel stuff to you. You do what you're best at - trying to destroy anyone who might disagree with you. It's not about "destroy(ing) anyone who might disagree with (me)", Brain...It's about not tolerating that which I know to be false and is known to others. You make silly, even stupid assertions and claims and then take offense when people pile up on you for being silly and stupid. That's YOUR "fault". Steve, K4YZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... No, Brain, it was YOUR "Avenging Angel" personna that was at work. When YOU do something like that it's "levity"...trying to get someone to "lighten up". When I say something similar you whip out this new "Avenging Angel" spin in order to try and disguise your own conduct. If I've offended Kim, I'm sorry. You offend more than Kim, Brain. You offend yourself, but you are too self-centered to se it. You offend everyone and embarass your family name. But you are too self-centeered to realize it. I say it's yet one more example of following in the footsteps of Lennie the Liar..."Don't So As I Do...Do As I Say"... Bascially, I just think you're two-faced. Steve, K4YZ No, Steve, not true. I have the capacity to say I was wrong an apologize. Being able to "apologize" is worthy, Brian. Being able to not offend in the first place is even better. We all make mistakes. I leave the Avenging Angel stuff to you. You do what you're best at - trying to destroy anyone who might disagree with you. It's not about "destroy(ing) anyone who might disagree with (me)", Brain...It's about not tolerating that which I know to be false and is known to others. There are many falsehoods promoted on RRAP. Yet you target only Len (and me) for destruction. Your Avenging Angel Wings provide sanctuary to your favorite falsehoods. In doing so, you lie to yourself. You make silly, even stupid assertions and claims and then take offense when people pile up on you for being silly and stupid. That's YOUR "fault". I accept and admit that I made a mistake, and I apologized. What is your excuse? Go get professional help. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? new thread, new beginning, kinda ? | Antenna | |||
Reflections on rrap | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the | Antenna | |||
The BPL of rrap | Policy |